Technical Papers
Dec 20, 2019

Removal Kinetics of Olive-Mill Wastewater in a Batch-Operated Aerobic Bioreactor

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 3

Abstract

This study involves the removal of the olive-mill wastewater (OMW), which is a significant pollutant, in a batch reactor under aerobic conditions by mixed cultures. It also includes comparison of different substrate inhibition models, calculation of kinetic parameters, and testing the merit of the chosen mathematical model with respect to OMW concentration and changes with time. Average initial microorganism concentration (X0) in the batch reactor was 100±15  mgL1. During the study the treatment of OMW with initial chemical oxygen demand (S0) concentration between 10and1,000  mgCODL1 was investigated. Maximum specific growth rate (μmax) was reached with 130  mgCODL1 initial concentration and 3 h experimental duration produced 57.17% chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency. Other experiments with increasing initial concentration increased COD removal duration, with 927  mgCODL1 initial concentration regressing to 8.88% removal efficiency after 3 h. The biokinetic equations of Aiba, Haldane, Tseng, and Yano and Koga were chosen to relate S0 concentration to specific growth rate (μ) and the biokinetic parameters in these equations were calculated. The most appropriate biokinetic equation was the Haldane model in terms of R2 value and the Haldane equation parameters 0.43  h1, 45.34  mgL1, and 207.97  mgL1 were calculated for μmax, half-saturation constant (Ks) and inhibition constant (Ki), respectively. Also, a mathematical biokinetic model including the Haldane equation was used to test the OMW removal performance and it was seen that the chosen model was well able to reflect system behavior. After the calibration of μmax, the most-sensitive parameter of the Haldane model, to 0.22  h1, the model gave a better fit for all tested conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for laboratory support of Ataturk University Department of Environmental Engineering.

References

Aiba, S., M. Shoda, and M. Nagatani. 1968. “Kinetics of product inhibition in alcohol fermentation.” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 10 (6): 845–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260100610.
Al Bawab, A., N. Ghannam, S. Abu-Mallouh, A. Bozeya, R. A. Abu-Zurayk, Y. A. Al-Ajlouni, F. Odeh, and M. A. Abu-Dalo. 2015. “Olive mill wastewater treatment in Jordan: A Review.” In Proc., IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 012002. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.
Al-Qodah, Z., M. Al-Shannag, K. Bani-Melhem, E. Assirey, K. Alananbeh, and N. Bouqellah. 2015. “Biodegradation of olive mills wastewater using thermophilic bacteria.” Desalin. Water Treat. 56 (7): 1908–1917. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.954148.
Andreozzi, R., M. Canterino, I. Di Somma, R. Lo Giudice, R. Marotta, G. Pinto, and A. Pollio. 2008. “Effect of combined physico-chemical processes on the phytotoxicity of olive mill wastewaters.” Water Res. 42 (6–7): 1684–1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.10.018.
APHA (American Public Health Association). 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: APHA.
Atanassova, D., P. Kefalas, C. Petrakis, D. Mantzavinos, N. Kalogerakis, and E. Psillakis. 2005. “Sonochemical reduction of the antioxidant activity of olive mill wastewater.” Environ. Int. 31 (2): 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.10.004.
Bajaj, M., C. Gallert, and J. Winter. 2009. “Phenol degradation kinetics of an aerobic mixed culture.” Biochem. Eng. J. 46 (2): 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2009.05.021.
Benitez, J., J. Beltran-Heredia, J. Torregrosa, J. Acero, and V. Cercas. 1997. “Aerobic degradation of olive mill wastewaters.” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 47 (2): 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530050910.
Chiavola, A., G. Farabegoli, and F. Antonetti. 2014. “Biological treatment of olive mill wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor.” Biochem. Eng. J. 85 (Apr): 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2014.02.004.
Coskun, T., E. Debik, and N. M. Demir. 2010. “Treatment of olive mill wastewaters by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.” Desalination 259 (1): 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.034.
D’Adamo, P. D., A. F. Rozich, and A. F. Gaudy. 1984. “Analysis of growth data with inhibitory carbon sources.” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26 (4): 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260260421.
Değermenci, N., İ. Cengiz, E. Yildiz, and A. Nuhoglu. 2016. “Performance investigation of a jet loop membrane bioreactor for the treatment of an actual olive mill wastewater.” J. Environ. Manage. 184 (Dec): 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.014.
Dionisi, D. 2017. Biological wastewater treatment processes: Mass and heat balances. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Ergüder, T. H., E. Güven, and G. N. Demirer. 2000. “Anaerobic treatment of olive mill wastes in batch reactors.” Process Biochem. 36 (3): 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(00)00205-3.
Folin, O., and V. Ciocalteu. 1927. “On tyrosine and tryptophane determinations in proteins.” J. Biol. Chem. 73 (2): 627–650.
Haldane, J. B. S. 1930. Enzymes. London: Longmans.
Justino, C. I. L., R. Pereira, A. C. Freitas, T. A. P. Rocha-Santos, T. S. L. Panteleitchouk, and A. C. Duarte. 2012. “Olive oil mill wastewaters before and after treatment: A critical review from the ecotoxicological point of view.” Ecotoxicology 21 (2): 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0806-y.
Karahan Özgün, Ö., İ. Pala Özkök, C. Kutay, and D. Orhon. 2016. “Characteristics and biodegradability of olive mill wastewaters.” Environ. Technol. 37 (10): 1240–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1110204.
Kul, S., R. Boncukcuoğlu, A. E. Yilmaz, and B. A. Fil. 2015a. “Treatment of olive mill wastewater with electro-oxidation method.” J. Electrochem. Soc. 162 (8): G41–G47. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0451508jes.
Kul, S., A. Nuhoğlu, and E. Aladağ. 2015b. “Aerobic treatment of olive mill wastewater by batch reactor: A kinetic study.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Civil and Environmental Engineering, edited by S. Şahinkaya and E. Kalıpçı, 416–422. Nevşehir, Turkey: Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Univ.
Lafi, W. K., B. Shannak, M. Al-Shannag, Z. Al-Anber, and M. Al-Hasan. 2009. “Treatment of olive mill wastewater by combined advanced oxidation and biodegradation.” Sep. Purif. Technol. 70 (2): 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2009.09.008.
Ma, J.-Y., X.-C. Quan, Z.-F. Yang, and A.-J. Li. 2012. “Biodegradation of a mixture of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and multiple chlorophenols by aerobic granules cultivated through plasmid pJP4 mediated bioaugmentation.” Chem. Eng. J. 181 (Feb): 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.11.041.
Martinez-Garcia, G., A. C. Johnson, R. T. Bachmann, C. J. Williams, A. Burgoyne, and R. G. J. Edyvean. 2007. “Two-stage biological treatment of olive mill wastewater with whey as co-substrate.” Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 59 (4): 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.03.008.
McNamara, C. J., C. C. Anastasiou, V. O’Flaherty, and R. Mitchell. 2008. “Bioremediation of olive mill wastewater.” Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 61 (2): 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.11.003.
Niaounakis, M., and C. P. Halvadakis. 2006. “Foreword to the second edition.” In Waste management series, edited by N. Michael and P. H. Constantinos, 15–16. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Nuhoglu, A., and B. Yalcin. 2005. “Modelling of phenol removal in a batch reactor.” Process Biochem. 40 (3–4): 1233–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.04.003.
Ochando-Pulido, J. M., M. D. Victor-Ortega, G. Hodaifa, and A. Martinez-Ferez. 2015. “Physicochemical analysis and adequation of olive oil mill wastewater after advanced oxidation process for reclamation by pressure-driven membrane technology.” Sci. Total Environ. 503–504 (Jan): 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.109.
Ojumu, T. V., O. O. Bello, J. A. Sonibare, and B. O. Solomon. 2005. “Evaluation of microbial systems for bioremediation of petroleum refinery effluents in Nigeria.” Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4 (1): 31.
Oktav, E., E. Çokay Çatalkaya, and F. Şengül. 2003. “Zeytinyağı endüstrisi atıksularının kimyasal yöntemlerle arıtımı.” Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi 5 (3): 11–21.
Paraskeva, P., and E. Diamadopoulos. 2006. “Technologies for olive mill wastewater (OMW) treatment: A review.” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 81 (9): 1475–1485. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1553.
Pelillo, M., B. Rincón, F. Raposo, A. Martín, and R. Borja. 2006. “Mathematical modelling of the aerobic degradation of two-phase olive mill effluents in a batch reactor.” Biochem. Eng. J. 30 (3): 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2006.05.016.
Sierra, J., E. Martí, M. A. Garau, and R. Cruañas. 2007. “Effects of the agronomic use of olive oil mill wastewater: Field experiment.” Sci. Total Environ. 378 (1–2): 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.009.
Silva, F., A. Pirra, J. Sousa, L. Arroja, and I. Capela. 2011. “Biodegradation kinetics of winery wastewater from port wine production.” Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 25 (4): 493–499.
Tazdait, D., N. Abdi, H. Grib, H. Lounici, A. Pauss, and N. Mameri. 2013. “Comparison of different models of substrate inhibition in aerobic batch biodegradation of malathion.” Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci. 37 (3): 221–230.
Tseng, M. M.-C., and M. Wayman. 1975. “Kinetics of yeast growth: Inhibition-threshold substrate concentrations.” Can. J. Microbiol. 21 (7): 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1139/m75-147.
Ucun, H., E. Yildiz, and A. Nuhoglu. 2010. “Phenol biodegradation in a batch jet loop bioreactor (JLB): Kinetics study and pH variation.” Bioresour. Technol. 101 (9): 2965–2971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.005.
Yahiaoui, O., H. Lounici, N. Abdi, N. Drouiche, N. Ghaffour, A. Pauss, and N. Mameri. 2011. “Treatment of olive mill wastewater by the combination of ultrafiltration and bipolar electrochemical reactor processes.” Chem. Eng. Process: Process Intensif. 50 (1): 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2010.11.003.
Yano, T., and S. Koga. 1969. “Dynamic behavior of the chemostat subject to substrate inhibition.” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 11 (2): 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260110204.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 146Issue 3March 2020

History

Received: Feb 14, 2019
Accepted: Jul 25, 2019
Published online: Dec 20, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 20, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Emergency Aid and Disaster Management, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Bayburt Univ., Bayburt 69000, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7824-756X. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Alper Nuhoğlu [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Atatürk Univ., Erzurum 25240, Turkey. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share