Technical Papers
Nov 27, 2017

Forward Osmosis: Mass Transmission Coefficient–Based Models for Evaluation of Concentration Polarization under Different Conditions

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 2

Abstract

In the past, forward osmosis (FO) models were developed to evaluate the effects of concentration polarization (CP), including external CP (ECP) and internal CP (ICP), on FO performance. However, these models are not clear about the reverse salt flux of FO membranes because they often assume the osmosis reflection coefficient σ to be 1. In addition, these models need some empirical parameters that are difficult to obtain via experiments. In this study, a new set of FO models was developed, for the first time, on the basis of mass transmission coefficient (ηMT) and σ. These models were used to evaluate the impact of ECP and ICP on FO performance under the influence of different parameters and conditions. Data from previous studies were used to verify the models based on experimental and model-calculated ηMT. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for these models to find the most sensitive parameters to ECP, ICP, ηMT, and FO water flux Jv. Results indicate that σ is the most relatively influential parameter to concentrative ECP or concentrative ICP, revealing the FO membrane’s reverse salt flux. The models developed can be used to analyze how ECP, ICP, and ηMT change under different FO systems and experimental conditions, including FO reactor configuration, mixing intensity, water velocity, FO membranes, and draw-solution concentration.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Achilli, A., Cath, T. Y., and Childress, A. E. (2010). “Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications.” J. Membr. Sci., 364(1–2), 233–241.
Arena, J. T., Manickam, S. S., Reimund, K. K., Freeman, B. D., and McCutcheon, J. R. (2014). “Solute and water transport in forward osmosis using polydopamine modified thin film composite membranes.” Desalination, 343, 8–16.
Bui, N.-N., Arena, J. T., and McCutcheon, J. R. (2015). “Proper accounting of mass transfer resistances in forward osmosis: Improving the accuracy of model predictions of structural parameter.” J. Membr. Sci., 492, 289–302.
Cath, T. Y., et al. (2013). “Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes.” Desalination, 312, 31–38.
Chanukya, B. S., Patil, S., and Rastogi, N. K. (2013). “Influence of concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis during desalination using ammonium bicarbonate.” Desalination, 312, 39–44.
Choi, Y.-J., Choi, J.-S., Oh, H.-J., Lee, S., Yang, D. R., and Kim, J. H. (2009). “Toward a combined system of forward osmosis and reverse osmosis for seawater desalination.” Desalination, 247(1), 239–246.
D’Haese, A. K., Motsa, M. M., Van der Meeren, P., and Verliefde, A. R. (2017). “A refined draw solute flux model in forward osmosis: Theoretical considerations and experimental validation.” J. Membr. Sci., 522, 316–331.
Gekas, V., and Hallström, B. (1987). “Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow.” J. Membr. Sci., 30(2), 153–170.
Gray, G. T., McCutcheon, J. R., and Elimelech, M. (2006). “Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: Role of membrane orientation.” Desalination, 197(1), 1–8.
Jung, D. H., et al. (2011). “Simulation of forward osmosis membrane process: Effect of membrane orientation and flow direction of feed and draw solutions.” Desalination, 277(1–3), 83–91.
Lee, J., Choi, J. Y., Choi, J.-S., Chu, K. H., Yoon, Y., and Kim, S. (2017). “A statistics-based forward osmosis membrane characterization method without pressurized reverse osmosis experiment.” Desalination, 403, 36–45.
Lee, K. L., Baker, R. W., and Lonsdale, H. K. (1981). “Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis.” J. Membr. Sci., 8(2), 141–171.
Loeb, S., Titelman, L., Korngold, E., and Freiman, J. (1997). “Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane.” J. Membr. Sci., 129(2), 243–249.
McCutcheon, J. R., and Elimelech, M. (2006). “Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis.” J. Membr. Sci., 284(1–2), 237–247.
Melching, C. S., and Yoon, C. G. (1996). “Key sources of uncertainty in QUAL2E model of Passaic River.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 105–113.
Phillip, W. A., Yong, J. S., and Elimelech, M. (2010). “Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: Modeling and experiments.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 44(13), 5170–5176.
Sagiv, A., Christofides, P. D., Cohen, Y., and Semiat, R. (2015). “On the analysis of FO mass transfer resistances via CFD analysis and film theory.” J. Membr. Sci., 495, 198–205.
Su, J., and Chung, T.-S. (2011). “Sublayer structure and reflection coefficient and their effects on concentration polarization and membrane performance in FO processes.” J. Membr. Sci., 376(1–2), 214–224.
Tan, C. H., and Ng, H. Y. (2008). “Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations.” J. Membr. Sci., 324(1–2), 209–219.
Tang, C. Y., She, Q., Lay, W. C. L., Wang, R., and Fane, A. G. (2010). “Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration.” J. Membr. Sci., 354(1–2), 123–133.
van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Grunwald, S., Bishop, T., Diluzio, M., and Srinivasan, R. (2006). “A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models.” J. Hydrol., 324(1–4), 10–23.
Wang, Y., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Xiao, Q., and Xu, S. (2016). “Quantitative evaluation of concentration polarization under different operating conditions for forward osmosis process.” Desalination, 398, 106–113.
Wei, J., Qiu, C., Tang, C. Y., Wang, R., and Fane, A. G. (2011). “Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 372(1–2), 292–302.
Xue, W., Yamamoto, K., Tobino, T., and Ratanatamskul, C. (2016). “Modeling prediction of the process performance of seawater-driven forward osmosis for nutrients enrichment: Implication for membrane module design and system operation.” J. Membr. Sci., 515, 7–21.
Zhang, S., Wang, K. Y., Chung, T.-S., Jean, Y. C., and Chen, H. (2011). “Molecular design of the cellulose ester-based forward osmosis membranes for desalination.” Chem. Eng. Sci., 66(9), 2008–2018.
Zhao, S., and Zou, L. (2011). “Effects of working temperature on separation performance, membrane scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis desalination.” Desalination, 278(1–3), 157–164.
Zhou, A., Zhang, T. C., and Yuan, Y. (2012). “Performance of forward osmosis processes under different operating conditions and draw solutes.” World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012, ASCE, Reston, VA, 808–817.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 144Issue 2February 2018

History

Received: Jan 26, 2017
Accepted: Jun 8, 2017
Published online: Nov 27, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Apr 27, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kang Rong, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln at Omaha, 136, PKI, Omaha, NE 68182-0178. E-mail: [email protected]
Tian C. Zhang, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln at Omaha, 205D, PKI, Omaha, NE 68182-0178 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share