TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jan 5, 2011

Response of Soil Water Chemistry to Simulated Changes in Acid Deposition in the Great Smoky Mountains

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 7

Abstract

Watershed recovery from acidic deposition, such as the Noland Divide Watershed in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, is difficult to predict because of complex biogeochemical processes exhibited in soils. Laboratory soil columns and in situ pan lysimeters were used to investigate soil solution response to simulated reductions in acid deposition. Controlling for influent SO42-, NO3-, and NH4+ concentrations in the column experiments, effluent pH declined similarly to 4.4 among five experimental scenarios from an initial pH of approximately 4.7 and 6.1. Influent-effluent chemical comparisons suggest nitrification and/or SO42- desorption controls effluent pH. Sulfate adsorption occurred when SO42- influent was greater than 25μmolL-1 and desorption occurred below 15μmolL-1, which would equate to approximately a 61% reduction in current SO42- deposition levels. Base cation depletion occurred in column experiments, in which 6460μmolL-1 Ca2+ and 2427μmolL-1 Mg2+ reductions were measured. Cation depletion rates were pH dependent, primarily caused by soil cation exchange and not weathering. In these soils with base saturation below 7%, complete Ca2+ and Mg2+ depletion was estimated as 90 to 140 years. Protons released by SO42- desorption via ligand exchange are expected to cause further base cation depletion, thereby delaying watershed recovery. Field experiments found SO42- sorption dynamics to be limited by kinetics and hydrologic interflow rates, illustrating how precipitation intensity can influence ion transport from soil to stream. Results from this study provide important information for predicting watershed recovery in the future and suggest needs for further research.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part by the U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service Cooperative Agreement Grant No. USDI1443-CA-5460-98-006 (Amendment 10) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the University of Tennessee Natural Research Policy Center, U.S. EPA Grant No. USEPAEM-83298901-1. Special thanks are given to Joe Parker, Keil Neff, Tom Zimmerman, and Lee Mauney for collecting soil samples, constructing the field experiment site, and chemical analysis. The writers are thankful for the support of Dr. Nancy Finley, former Natural Resource Research Director at the GRSM. The writers appreciate the help of Zhengxin Li for help with soil sieving and installation of soil columns. Dr. Michael Essington provided helpful suggestions with the project’s study design.

References

Barker, M., van Miegroet, H., Nicholas, N. S., and Creed, I. F. (2002). “Variation in overstory nitrogen uptake in a small, high-elevation southern Appalachian spruce-fir watershed.” Can. J. For. Res., 32(10), 1741–1752.
Beier, C., Blanck, K., Bredemeier, M., Lamersdorf, N., Rasmussen, L., and Xu, Y. (1998). “Field-scale ‘clean rain’ treatments to two Norway spruce stands within the EXMAN project—Effects on soil solution chemistry, foliar nutrition and tree growth.” For. Ecol. Manage., 101(1–3), 111–123.
Berdén, M., and Nilsson, S. I. (1996). “Influence of added ammonium sulphate on the leaching of aluminum, nitrate and sulphate—A laboratory experiment.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 87(1–4), 1–22.
Blake, L., and Goulding, K. W. T. (2002). “Effects of atmospheric deposition, soil pH and acidification on heavy metal contents in soils and vegetation of semi-natural ecosystems at Rothamsted Experimental Station, UK.” Plant Soil, 240(2), 235–251.
Blake, L., Goulding, K. W. T., Mott, C. J. B., and Johnston, A. E. (1999). “Changes in soil chemistry accompanying acidification over more than 100 years under woodland and grass at Rothamsted Experimental Station, UK.” Eur. J. Soil Sci., 50(3), 401–412.
Bredemeier, M., et al. (1998). “The Solling roof project—Site characteristics, experiments and results.” For. Ecol. Manage., 101(1–3), 281–293.
Bredemeier, M., Blanck, K., Lamersdorf, N., and Wiedey, G. A. (1995). “Response of soil water chemistry to experimental ‘clean rain’ in the NITREX roof experiment at Solling, Germany.” For. Ecol. Manage., 71(1–2), 31–44.
Buttle, J. M., and Leigh, D. G. (1997). “The influence of artificial macropores on water and solute transport in laboratory soil columns.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 191(1–4), 290–313.
Cai, M., Johnson, A. M., Schwartz, J. S., Moore, S. E., and Kulp, M. A. (2011). “Soil acid-base chemistry of a high-elevation forest watershed in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park: Influence of acidic deposition.” Water Air Soil Pollut., in press.
Cai, M., Schwartz, J. S., Robinson, R. B., Moore, S. E., and Kulp, M. A. (2010). “Long-term effects of acidic deposition on water quality in a high-elevation Great Smoky Mountains National Park watershed: Use of an ion input-output budget.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 209(1–4), 143–156.
Calace, N., Fiorentini, F., Petronio, B. M., and Pietroletti, M. (2001). “Effects of acid rain on soil humic compounds.” Talanta, 54(5), 837–846.
Chen, Y., and Lin, L. S. (2009). “Responses of streams in central Appalachian Mountain region to reduced acidic deposition—Comparisons with others regions in North America and Europe.” Sci. Total Environ., 407(7), 2285–2295.
Clayton, J. L., Kennedy, D. A., and Nagel, T. (1991a). “Soil response to acid deposition, Wind River Mountains, Wyoming: I. Soil properties.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55(5), 1427–1433.
Clayton, J. L., Kennedy, D. A., and Nagel, T. (1991b). “Soil response to acid deposition, Wind River Mountains, Wyoming: II. Column leaching studies.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55(5), 1433–1439.
Cronan, C. S., Walker, W. J., and Bloom, J. T. (1986). “Predicting aqueous aluminum concentrations in natural waters.” Nature, 324(6093), 140–143.
Currie, W. S., Aber, J. D., and Driscoll, C. T. (1999). “Leaching of nutrient cations from the forest floor: Effects of nitrogen saturation in two long-term manipulations.” Can. J. For. Res., 29(5), 609–620.
Dahlgren, R. A., McAvoy, D. C., and Driscoll, C. T. (1990). “Acidification and recovery of a Spodosol Bs horizon from acidic deposition.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 24(4), 531–537.
Dahlgren, R. A., and Walker, W. J. (1993). “Aluminum release rates from selected Spodosol Bs horizons: Effects of pH and solid phase aluminum pools.” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 57(1), 57–66.
Driscoll, C. T., et al. (2001). “Acidic deposition in the northeastern United States: Sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies.” BioScience, 51(3), 180–197.
Dubiková, M., Cambier, P., Šucha, V., and Čaplovičová, M. (2002). “Experimental soil acidification.” Appl. Geochem., 17(3), 245–257.
Edwards, P. J., Kochenderfer, J. N., Coble, D. W., and Adams, M. B. (2002). “Soil leachate responses during 10 years of induced whole-watershed acidification.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 140(1–4), 99–118.
Evans, C. D., et al. (2008). “Does elevated nitrogen deposition or ecosystem recovery from acidification drive increased dissolved organic carbon loss from upland soil? A review of evidence from field nitrogen addition experiments.” Biogeochemistry, 91(1), 13–35.
Fernandez, I. J., Rustad, L. E., Norton, S. A., Kahl, J. S., and Cosby, B. J. (2003). “Experimental acidification causes soil base-cation depletion at the Bear Brook Watershed in Maine.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67(6), 1909–1919.
Fernandez, I. J., and Wortman, L. (1997). “Precipitation chemistry at the Greenville, Maine NADPMTN Station 1980–1995.” Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station Technical Bulletin No. 164, Orono, ME.
Forsius, M., Vuorenmaa, J., Mannio, J., and Syri, S. (2003). “Recovery from acidification of Finnish lakes: Regional patterns and relations to emission reduction policy.” Sci. Total Environ., 310(1–3), 121–132.
Guicharnaud, R., and Paton, G. I. (2006). “An evaluation of acid deposition on cation leaching and weathering rates of an Andosol and a Cambisol.” J. Geochem. Explor., 88(1–3), 279–283.
Hodson, M. E., and Langan, S. J. (1999). “A long-term soil leaching column experiment investigating the effect of variable sulphate loads on soil solution and soil drainage chemistry.” Environ. Pollut., 104(1), 11–19.
Jeffries, D. S., Brydges, T. G., Dillon, P. J., and Keller, W. (2003). “Monitoring the results of Canada/U.S.A acid rain control programs: Some lake responses.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 88(1–3), 3–19.
Jemison, M. J., and Fox, R. H. (1992). “Estimation of zero-tension pan lysimeter collection efficiency.” Soil Sci., 154(2), 85–94.
Johnson, D. W., and Lindberg, S. E., eds. (1992). Atmospheric deposition and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems: A synthesis of the Integrated Forest Study, Springer, New York.
Johnson, D. W., Walker, R. F., and Ball, J. T. (1995). “Lessons from lysimeters: Soil N release from disturbance compromises controlled environment study.” Ecol. Appl., 5(2), 395–400.
Jönsson, U., Rosengren, U., Thelin, G., and Nihlgard, B. (2003). “Acidification-induced chemical changes in coniferous forest soils in southern Sweden 1988–1999.” Environ. Pollut., 123(1), 75–83.
Kirchner, J. W., Feng, X., and Neal, C. (2000). “Fractal stream chemistry and its implications for contaminant transport in catchments.” Nature, 403(6769), 524–527.
Lamersdorf, N. P., and Borken, W. (2004). “Clean rain promotes fine root growth and soil respiration in a Norway spruce forest.” Global Change Biol., 10(8), 1351–1362.
Langan, S., Fransson, L., and Vanguelova, E. (2009). “Dynamic modelling of the response of UK forest soils to changes in acid deposition using the SAFE model.” Sci. Total Environ., 407(21), 5605–5619.
Liu, K. H., Mansell, R. S., and Rhue, R. D. (1990). “Cation removal during application of acid solutions into air-dry soil columns.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 54(6), 1747–1753.
Mannings, S., Smith, S., and Bell, J. N. B. (1996). “Effect of acid deposition on soil acidification and metal mobilisation.” Appl. Geochem., 11(1–2), 139–143.
Martinson, L., Alveteg, M., and Warfvinge, P. (2003). “Parameterization and evaluation of sulfate adsorption in a dynamic soil chemistry model.” Environ. Pollut., 124(1), 119–125.
Matejko, M., et al. (2009). “The influence of long term trends in pollutant emissions on deposition of sulphur and nitrogen and exceedance of critical loads in the United Kingdom.” Environ. Sci. Policy, 12(7), 882–896.
Matzner, E., Pijpers, M., Holland, W., and Manderscheid, B. (1998). “Aluminum in soil solutions for forest soils: Influence of water flow and soil aluminum pools.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 62(2), 445–454.
McCracken, R. J., Shanks, R. E., and Clebsch, E. E. C. (1962). “Soil morphology and genesis at higher elevations of the Great Smoky Mountains.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 26(4), 384–388.
Menz, F. C., and Seip, H. M. (2004). “Acid rain in Europe and the United States: An update.” Environ. Sci. Policy, 7(4), 253–265.
Mulder, J., van Breemen, N., and Eijck, H. C. (1989). “Depletion of soil aluminum by acid deposition and implications for acid neutralization.” Nature, 337(6204), 247–249.
Nilsson, S. I., and Tyler, G. (1995). “Acidification-induced chemical changes of forest soils during recent decades—A review.” Ecol. Bull., 44, 54–64.
Origin 7.5 [Computer software]. OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA.
Persson, T., and Wirén, A. (1995). “Nitrogen mineralization and potential nitrification at different depths in acid forest soils.” Plant Soil, 168–169(1), 55–65.
Pigna, M., and Violante, A. (2003). “Adsorption of sulfate and phosphate on Andisols.” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 34(15–16), 2099–2113.
Shanks, R. E. (1954). “Climates of the Great Smoky Mountains.” Ecology, 35(3), 354–284.
Shannon, J. D. (1999). “Regional trends in wet deposition of sulphate in the United States and SO2 emissions from 1980 through 1995.” Atmos. Environ., 33(5), 807–816.
Stark, J. M., and Hart, S. C. (1997). “High rates of nitrification and nitrate turnover in undisturbed coniferous forests.” Nature, 385(6611), 61–64.
Stevens, C. J., Dise, N. B., and Gowing, D. J. (2009). “Regional trends in soil acidification and exchangeable metal concentrations in relation to acid deposition rates.” Environ. Pollut., 157(1), 313–319.
Stoddard, J. L., et al. (1999). “Regional trends in aquatic recovery from acidification in North America and Europe.” Nature, 401(6753), 575–578.
Stoddard, J. L., et al. (2003). “Response of surface water chemistry to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.” EPA 620/R-03/001, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Sullivan, T. J., et al. (2004). “Regional model projections of future effects of sulfur and nitrogen deposition on streams in the southern Appalachian Mountains.” Water Resour. Res., 40(2), W02101.
Sverdrup, H., Warfvinge, P., Blake, L., and Goulding, K. W. T. (1995). “Modelling recent and historic soil data from the Rothamsted Experimental Station, UK using SAFE.” Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 53(2), 161–177.
Szillery, J. E., Fernandez, I. J., Norton, S. A., Rustad, L. E., and White, A. S. (2006). “Using ion-exchange resins to study soil response to experimental watershed acidification.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 116(1–3), 383–398.
Tiktak, A., and van Grinsven, H. J. M. (1995). “Review of sixteen forest-soil-atmosphere models Ecol. Model., 83(1–2), 35–53.
Tipping, E., et al. (2003). “The solid-solution partitioning of heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb) in upland soils of England and Wales.” Environ. Pollut., 125(2), 213–225.
U.S. EPA. (1970). “Clean air act.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/〉.
U.S. EPA. (1990). “Clean air act amendments of 1990.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/overview.txt〉.
USGS. (2005). Geologic map of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region, Tennessee and North Carolina, USGS Open-File Rep. 2005-1225. 〈http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1225/
Van Miegroet, H., et al. (2001). “Is there synchronicity in nitrogen input and output fluxes at the Noland Divide Watershed, a small N-saturated forested catchment in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park?” Sci. World J., 1(S2), 480–492.
Van Miegroet, H., Johnson, D. W., and Todd, D. E. (1993). “Foliar response of red spruce saplings to fertilization with Ca and Mg in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.” Can. J. For. Res., 23(1), 89–95.
Vanguelova, E. I., et al. (2010). “Chemical fluxes in time through forest ecosystems in the UK—Soil response to pollution recovery.” Environ. Pollut., 158(5), 1857–1869.
Wilson, M. J., and Bell, N. (1996). “Acid deposition and heavy metal mobilization.” Appl. Geochem., 11(1–2), 133–137.
Wright, R., and Rasmussen, L. (1998). “Introduction to the NITREX and EXMAN project.” For. Ecol. Manage., 101(1–3), 1–7.
Zhu, Y., Fox, R. H., and Toth, J. D. (2002). “Leachate collection efficiency of zero-tension pan and passive capillary fiber wick lysimeters.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66(1), 37–43.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 137Issue 7July 2011
Pages: 617 - 628

History

Received: May 14, 2010
Accepted: Jan 3, 2011
Published online: Jan 5, 2011
Published in print: Jul 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Meijun Cai
Post Doctorate Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
Amy M. Johnson
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
John S. Schwartz, F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Stephen E. Moore
Supervisory Fishery Biologist, U.S. Dept. of Interior, National Park Service, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Gatlinburg, TN, 37738
Matt A. Kulp
Fishery Biologist, U.S. Dept. of Interior, National Park Service, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Gatlinburg, TN, 37738

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share