TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 6, 2010

Uncertainty Assessment of a Water-Quality Model for Ephemeral Rivers Using GLUE Analysis

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 3

Abstract

Every model is, by definition, a simplification of the system under investigation. Although it would be desirable to reduce the gap between the simulated and the observed behaviors of the system to zero, this reduction is generally impossible owing to the unavoidable uncertainties inherent in any modeling procedure. Uncertainty analyses can provide useful insights into the best model approach to be used for obtaining results with a high level of significance and reliability. The evaluation of parameter uncertainties is necessary for calibration and for estimating the impact of these uncertainties on model performance. In this context, the uncertainty of a river water-quality model developed in previous studies is presented. The main goal is to gain insights into the modeling approaches concerning small rivers. Previous works generally focused on modeling the large river while neglecting the small one. Following a model calibration, the model uncertainty has been assessed by means of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE). The results showed that the biological process related to the biological oxygen demand (BOD) removal influenced mainly by the parameters characterizing deoxygenation and nitrogen removal. On the other hand, the biological processes related to nitrogen removal were influenced not only by the parameters related to the nitrogen removal but also to oxygen concentration. The application of the GLUE methodology shows that the river quality model considered is suitable for simulating the important processes involved. Uncertainty bounds showed different amplitudes with respect to the pollutant species considered. In particular, the oxygen uncertainty bounds were narrower with respect to the other model components suggesting much attention must be paid to both model algorithms and quality data to be gathered. The study confirmed the suitability of the GLUE methodology as a powerful tool as a simplified screening methodology to assess uncertainty.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Mrs. R. D’Addelfio, Mr. S. Sparacino, Mr. D. Tuttolomondo, Dr. G. Lo Piccolo, Dr. V. Parco, and Prof. S. Nicosia for their valuable assistance during field work.

References

Beck, M. B. (1987). “Water quality modelling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 23(8), 1393–1442.
Beven, K. J., and Binley, A. M. (1992). “The future of distributed models—Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Processes, 6(3), 279–298.
Beven, K. J., and Freer, J. (2001). “Equifinality, data assimilation and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam, Neth.), 249(1-4), 11–29.
Brown, L. C., and Barnwell, T. O. (1987). “The enhanced stream water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS EPA/600/3-87-007,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
Chapra, S. C. (1997). Surface water—Quality modelling, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Chapra, S., and Pellettier, G. (2003). “QUAL2K: A Modeling framework for simulating river and stream water quality.” Documentation and Users Manual, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Chave, P. (2001). “The EU water framework directive: An introduction,” IWA Publishing, London.
Cox, B. A. (2003). “A review of dissolved oxygen modelling techniques for lowland rivers.” Sci. Total Environ., 314-316(1), 303–334.
Du, J., Xie, S., Xu, Y., Xu, C.-Y., and Singh, V. P. (2007). “Development and testing of a simple physically-based distributed rainfall-runoff model for storm runoff simulation in humid forested basins.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam, Neth.), 336(3-4), 334–346.
Dubus, I. G., Brown, C. D., and Beulke, S. (2003). “Sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modeling.” Sci. Total Environ., 317(1-3), 53–72.
Freer, J., Beven, K. J., and Ambroise, B. (1996). “Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application of the GLUE approach.” Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2161–2174.
Freer, J. E., McMillan, H., McDonnell, J. J., and Beven, K. J. (2004). “Constraining dynamic TOPMODEL responses for imprecise water table information using fuzzy rule based performance measures.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam, Neth.), 291(3-4), 254–277.
Freni, G., and Mannina, G. (2010). “Bayesian approach for uncertainty quantification in water quality modelling: The influence of prior distribution.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam, Neth.), 392(1-2), 31–39.
Freni, G., Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2008). “Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: The effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology.” Water Res., 42(8-9), 2061–2072.
Freni, G., Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2009a). “Identifiability analysis for receiving water body quality modeling.” Environ. Model. Software, 24(1), 54–62.
Freni, G., Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2009b). “Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: The influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology.” Sci. Total Environ., 408(1), 138–145.
Freni, G., Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2009c). “Assessment of data availability influence on integrated urban drainage modelling uncertainty.” Environ. Model. Software, 24(10), 1171–1181.
Gupta, A. K., and Shrivastava, R. K. (2006). “Uncertainty analysis of conventional water treatment plant design for suspended solids removal.” J. Environ. Eng., 132(11), 1413–1421.
Harremoës, P. (1988). “Stocastic models for estimation of extreme pollution from urban runoff.” Water Resour., 22(8), 1017–1026.
Hornberger, G. M., and Spear, R. C. (1981). “An approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems.” J. Environ. Manage., 12(1), 7–18.
Lamb, R., Beven, K., and Myrabø, S. (1998). “Use of spatially distributed water table observations to constrain uncertainty in a rainfall runoff model.” Adv. Water Resour., 22(4), 305–317.
Lindblom, E. U., Madsen, H., and Mikkelsen, P. S. (2007). “Comparative uncertainty analysis of copper loads in stormwater systems using GLUE and grey-box modelling.” Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply, 56(6), 11–18.
Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2010a). “Water quality modelling for ephemeral rivers: Model development and parameter assessment.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam, Neth.), 393(3-4), 186–196.
Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2010b). “A parsimonious dynamic model for river water quality assessment.” Water Sci. Technol., 61(3), 607–618.
Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2010c). “A hydrodynamic water quality model for propagation of pollutants in rivers.” Water Sci. Technol., 62(2), 288–299.
Mantovan, P., and Todini, E. (2006). “Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam, Neth.), 330(1), 368–381.
Marsili-Libelli, S., and Giusti, E. (2008). “Water quality modelling for small river basins.” Environ. Model. Software, 23(4), 451–463.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliff, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through the conceptual model. Part 1: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam, Neth.), 10(3), 282–290.
Radwan, M., Willems, P., El-sadek, A., and Berlamont, J. (2003). “Modelling of dissolved oxygen and biochemical oxygen demand in river water using a detailed and a simplified model.” Int. J. River Basin Manage., 1(2), 97–103.
Refsgaard, J. C., Van der Sluijs, J. P., Højberg, A. L., and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2007). “Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process—A framework and guidance.” Environ. Model. Software, 22(11), 1543–1556.
Reichert, P., et al. (2001). “River water quality model no. 1,” IWA, London.
Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. (1983). “Automatic calibrations of conceptual rainfall—Runoff models: The question of parameter observability and uniqueness.” Water Resour. Res., 19(1), 260–268.
Thomann, R. V., and Mueller, J. A. (1987). “Principles of surface water quality modeling and control,” Harper and Row, New York, 644.
Thorndahl, S., Beven, K. J., Jensen, J. B., and Schaarup-Jensen, K. (2008). “Event based uncertainty assessment in urban drainage modelling, applying the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam, Neth.), 357(3-4), 421–437.
Vezzaro, L., Ledin, A., and Mikkelsen, P. S. (2010). “Integrated modelling of priority pollutants in stormwater systems.” Proc. IDRA Conf., Palermo, Italy.
Wagenschein, D., and Rode, M. (2008). “Modelling the impact of river morphology on nitrogen retention—A case study of the Weisse Elster River (Germany).” Ecol. Model., 211, 224–232.
Wool, T. A., Ambrose, R. B., Martin, J. L., and Comer, E. A. (2006). Water quality analysis simulation program (WASP) version 6.0 draft: User’s manual, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 137Issue 3March 2011
Pages: 177 - 186

History

Received: Feb 15, 2010
Accepted: Aug 4, 2010
Published online: Aug 6, 2010
Published in print: Mar 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Giorgio Mannina [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale e Aerospaziale–Area Ambientale, Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share