Sequential Electrokinetic Remediation of Mixed Contaminants in Low Permeability Soils
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 10
Abstract
The coexistence of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) at many of the contaminated sites poses a severe threat to public health and the environment. Very few technologies, such as soil washing/flushing and stabilization/solidification, are available to remediate such sites; however, these technologies are ineffective and expensive to treat contaminants in low permeability clayey soils. Previous studies have shown that electrokinetic remediation has potential to remove heavy metals and organic compounds when they exist individually in clayey soils. In the present study, the feasibility of using surfactants and organic acids sequentially and vice versa during electrokinetic remediation was evaluated for the removal of both heavy metals and PAHs from clayey soils. Kaolin was selected as a model clayey soil and it was spiked with phenanthrene and nickel at concentrations of 500 mg/kg dry each to simulate typical field mixed contamination. Bench-scale electrokinetic experiments were performed with the sequential anode conditioning with: (1) 1 M citric acid followed by 5% Igepal CA-720; (2) 1 M citric acid followed by 5% Tween 80; and (3) 5% Igepal CA-720 followed by 1 M citric acid. A periodic voltage gradient of 2 V/cm (with 5 days on and 2 days off cycles) was applied in all the tests. A removal of about 96% of phenanthrene was observed in the test with 5% Igepal CA-720 followed by 1 M citric acid sequence. Most of the nickel migrated from anode to cathode in this test; however, it precipitated in the section very close to the cathode due to the high pH conditions. Conversely, the removal efficiency of nickel was about 96 and 88% in the tests with 1 M citric acid followed by 5% Igepal CA-720 sequence and 1 M citric acid followed by 5% Tween 80 sequence, respectively. However, the migration and removal efficiency of phenanthrene in both of these tests were very low. Overall, it can be concluded that the sequential use of 5% Igepal CA-720 followed by 1 M citric acid may be an effective remedial strategy to remove coexisting heavy metals and PAHs from clayey soils.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Illinois Technology Challenge Grant and is gratefully acknowledged. Claudio Cameselle is also thankful for the Xunta de Galicia (Spain) fellowship which made it possible to conduct this research at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
References
Acar, Y. B., Gale, R. J., Alshawabkeh, A. N., Marks, R. E., Puppala, S., Bricka, M., and Parker, R. (1995). “Electrokinetic remediation: Basics and technology status.” J. Hazard. Mater., 40(2), 117–137.
Alshawabkeh, A. N., Yeung, A. T., and Bricka, M. R. (1999). “Practical aspects of in situ electrokinetic extraction.” J. Environ. Eng., 125(1), 27–35.
Amrate, S., Akretche, D. E., Innocent, C., and Seta, P. (2005). “Removal of Pb from a calcareous soil during EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction.” Sci. Total Environ., 349(1–3), 56–66.
Deng, X., and Jennings, A. A. (2006). “Evaluating an electrokinetically driven extraction method for measuring heavy metal soil contamination.” J. Environ. Eng., 132(4), 527–537.
Isosaari, P., Piskonen, R., Ojala, P., Voipio, S., Eilola, K., Lehmus, E., and Itävaara, M. (2007). “Integration of electrokinetics and chemical oxidation for the remediation of creosote-contaminated clay.” J. Hazard. Mater., 144(1–2), 538–548.
Khodadoust, A. P., Reddy, K. R., and Maturi, K. (2004). “Removal of nickel and phenanthrene from kaolin soil using different extractants.” J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 21(6), 691–704.
Khodadoust, A. P., Reddy, K. R., and Maturi, K. (2005). “Effect of different extraction agents on metal and organic contaminant removal from a field soil.” J. Hazard. Mater., 117(1), 15–24.
Ko, S., Schlautman, M. A., and Carraway, E. R. (1998a). “Partitioning of hydrophobic organic compounds to sorbed surfactants. 1. Experimental studies.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(18), 2769–2775.
Ko, S., Schlautman, M. A., and Carraway, E. R. (1998b). “Effects of solution chemistry on the partitioning of phenanthrene to sorbed surfactants.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(22), 3542–3548.
Maturi, K. (2004). “Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of soils contaminated with co-existing PAHs and heavy metals.” MS Thesis, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
Maturi, K., and Reddy, K. R. (2006). “Simultaneous removal of heavy metals and organic contaminants from soils by electrokinetics using a modified cyclodextrin.” Chemosphere, 63(6), 1022–1031.
Maturi, K., and Reddy, K. R. (2008a). “Extractants for the removal of mixed contaminants from soils.” Soil Sediment Contam., 17(6), 586–608.
Maturi, K., and Reddy, K. R. (2008b). “Cosolvent-enhanced desorption and transport of organic and metal contaminants in soils during electrokinetic remediation.” Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 189(1–4), 199–211.
Maturi, K., Reddy, K. R., and Cameselle, C. (2009). “Surfactant-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of mixed contamination in low permeability soil.” Sep. Sci. Technol., 44(10), 2385–2409.
Mitchell, J. K. (1993). Fundamentals of soil behavior, Wiley, New York.
Niqui-Arroyo, J. -L., and Ortega-Calvo, J. -J. (2007). “Integrating biodegradation and electroosmosis for the enhanced removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from creosote-polluted soils.” J. Environ. Qual., 36(5), 1444–1451.
Nogueira, M. G., Pazos, M., Sanromán, M. A., and Cameselle, C. (2007). “Improving on electrokinetic remediation in spiked Mn kaolinite by addition of complexing agents.” Electrochim. Acta, 52(10), 3349–3354.
Page, M. M., and Page, C. L. (2002). “Electroremediation of contaminated soils.” J. Environ. Eng., 128(3), 208–219.
Popov, K., Yachmenev, V., Kolosov, A., and Shabanova, N. (1999). “Zeta-potential of concrete in presence of chelating agents.” Colloids Surf., A, 160(2), 135–140.
Pourbaix, M. (1974). Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions, 2nd Ed., National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston.
Reddy, K. R., and Chinthamreddy, S. (2003). “Sequentially enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals in low buffering clayey soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 129(3), 263–277.
Reddy, K. R., and Chinthamreddy, S. (2004). “Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals in glacial till soils using different electrolyte solutions.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(4), 442–455.
Reddy, K. R., Danda, S., and Saichek, R. E. (2004). “Complicated factors of using ethylenediamine tetracetic acid to enhance electrokinetic remediation of multiple heavy metals in clayey soils.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(11), 1357–1366.
Reddy, K. R., Parupudi, U. S., Devulapalli, S. N., and Xu, C. Y. (1997). “Effects of soil composition on removal of chromium by electrokinetics.” J. Hazard. Mater., 55(1–3), 135–158.
Reddy, K. R., and Saichek, R. E. (2003). “Effect of soil type on electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene using surfactants and cosolvents.” J. Environ. Eng., 129, 336–346.
Reddy, K. R., and Saichek, R. E. (2004). “Enhanced electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene from clay soil by periodic electric potential application.” J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 39(5), 1189–1212.
Ribeiro, A. B., Rodriguez-Maroto, J. M., Mateus, E. P., and Gomes, H. (2005). “Removal of organic contaminants from soils by an electrokinetic process: The case of atrazine. Experimental and modeling.” Chemosphere, 59(9), 1229–1239.
Saichek, R. E., and Reddy, K. R. (2005). “Surfactant-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in heterogeneous subsurface environments.” J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 4(5), 327–339.
Sawada, A., Mori, K. -I., Tanaka, S., Fukushima, M., and Tatsumi, K. (2004). “Removal of Cr(VI) from contaminated soil by electrokinetic remediation.” Waste Manage., 24(5), 483–490.
Schwarzenbach, R. P., Gschwend, P. M., and Imboden, D. M. (1993). Environmental organic chemistry, Wiley, New York.
U.S. EPA. (1986). Test methods for evaluating solid waste, volume 1A: Laboratory manual, physical/chemical methods, SW-846, 3rd Ed., Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. (1996). “Clean up the nation's waste sites: markets and technology trends.” Rep. No. EPA 542-R-96–005, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. (2000). “A resource for MGP site characterization and remediation.” Rep. No. EPA/542-R-00–005, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.
Zagury, G. J., Dartiguenave, Y., and Setier, J. -C. (1999). “Ex situ electroreclamation of heavy metals contaminated sludge: Pilot scale study.” J. Environ. Eng., 125(10), 972–978.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 135 • Issue 10 • October 2009
Pages: 989 - 998
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: May 8, 2008
Accepted: Feb 25, 2009
Published online: Feb 27, 2009
Published in print: Oct 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.