Technical Papers
Sep 30, 2022

Investigation of Critical Factors for Future-Proofed Transportation Infrastructure Planning Using Topic Modeling and Association Rule Mining

Publication: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 1

Abstract

Most existing studies on transportation infrastructure planning focus on only one or a few critical factors. In addition, the interrelationships among different planning factors were seldom investigated. Therefore, this study aims to develop a holistic understanding of various critical factors and their interrelationships toward future-proofed transportation infrastructure planning. A novel text mining-based approach was proposed in this study to identify the critical factors and their interrelationships based on selected transportation infrastructure planning publications. Two topic modeling techniques, i.e., latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF), were used to identify the critical and emerging topics that may affect transportation infrastructures, resulting in the automatic identification of critical factors. These factors were compiled and converted to a four-level taxonomy via bottom-up grouping. Association rule mining (ARM) was then used to discover relations among the identified factors. Among these interrelationships, eight were found to be significant based on confidence and lift values as two quantitative measures of association rules. These findings could guide transportation infrastructure planners and decision makers to have a holistic approach to planning, building, and managing our transportation infrastructure in the face of future risks and opportunities. This study also demonstrates the potential of using text mining techniques to explore new knowledge in civil infrastructure planning.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research is provided by the Transportation Infrastructure Durability Center at the University of Maine under Grant 69A3551847101 from the US Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program.

References

Alderson, D. L., G. G. Brown, W. M. Carlyle, and R. K. Wood. 2018. “Assessing and improving the operational resilience of a large highway infrastructure system to worst-case losses.” Transp. Sci. 52 (4): 1012–1034. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2017.0749.
Ali, F., D. Kwak, P. Khan, S. El-Sappagh, A. Ali, S. Ullah, K. H. Kim, and K. S. Kwak. 2019. “Transportation sentiment analysis using word embedding and ontology-based topic modeling.” Knowl.-Based Syst. 174 (Jun): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.02.033.
Arun, A., S. Velmurugan, and M. Errampalli. 2013. “Methodological framework towards roadway capacity estimation for Indian multi-lane highways.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 104 (Dec): 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.141.
ASCE. 2021. A comprehensive assessment of America’s infrastructure. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Atlanta Regional Commission. 2011. Volume I: 2040 regional transportation plan. Atlanta: Atlanta Regional Commission.
Auburn-Opelika Metropolitan Planning Organization. 2015. 2040 long range transportation plan. Opelika, AL: Lee-Russell Council of Governments.
Borowski, E., Y. Chen, and H. Mahmassani. 2020. “Social media effects on sustainable mobility opinion diffusion: Model framework and implications for behavior change.” Travel Behav. Soc. 19 (Jan): 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.01.003.
Cage, F. 2022. The long road to electric cars. London: Reuters.
Chen, Y., J. Bordes, and D. Filliat. 2017. “Comparison studies on active cross-situational object-word learning using non-negative matrix factorization and latent Dirichlet allocation.” IEEE Trans. Cognit. Dev. Syst. 10 (4): 1023–1034. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2017.2725304.
Chowdhury, S., and J. Zhu. 2019. “Towards the ontology development for smart transportation infrastructure planning via topic modeling.” In Proc., 36th Int. Symp. Automation and Robotics in Construction ISARC 2019, 507–514. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Univ. of Alberta.
Chowdhury, S., and J. Zhu. 2021. “The usage of association rule mining towards future-proofed transportation infrastructure planning.” In Proc., ASCE Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil Engineering. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Connecticut DOT. 2015. Connecticut’s bold vision for a transportation future. Hartford, CT: The Office of Connecticut Governor.
Cradock, A. L., P. J. Troped, B. Fields, S. J. Melly, S. V. Simms, F. Gimmler, and M. Fowler. 2009. “Factors associated with federal transportation funding for local pedestrian and bicycle programming and facilities.” Supplement, J. Public Health Policy 30 (S1): S38–S72. https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2008.60.
CyberTalk. 2021. Ransomware attacks on the transportation industry. Tel Aviv, Israel: Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Dong, S., J. Zhong, P. Hao, W. Zhang, J. Chen, Y. Lei, and A. Schneider. 2018. “Mining multiple association rules in LTPP database: An analysis of asphalt pavement thermal cracking distress.” Constr. Build. Mater. 191 (Dec): 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.162.
ENISA (European Union Agency for Cybersecurity). 2021. Cybersecurity challenges in the uptake of artificial intelligence in autonomous driving. Athens, Greece: The European Union.
EPA. 2021. Sources of greenhouse gas emissions. Washington, DC: EPA.
Florida DOT. 2010. 2060 Florida transportation tlan. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization.
Frangopol, D. M., Y. Dong, and S. Sabatino. 2017. “Bridge life-cycle performance and cost: Analysis, prediction, optimisation and decision-making.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (10): 1239–1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1267772.
Godfrey, N., and R. Savage. 2012. Future proofing cities: Risks and opportunities for inclusive urban growth in developing countries. Epsom, UK: Atkins.
Gupta, V., and G. S. Lehal. 2009. “A survey of text mining techniques and applications.” J. Emerging Technol. Web Intell. 1 (1): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.4304/jetwi.1.1.60-76.
Harvey, J., A. Saboori, M. Miller, K. Changmo, M. Jaller, J. Lea, A. Kendall, and A. Saboori. 2020. Effects of increased weights of alternative fuel trucks on pavement and bridges. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
Hawkins, J., and K. Nurul Habib. 2019. “Integrated models of land use and transportation for the autonomous vehicle revolution.” Transp. Rev. 39 (1): 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1449033.
Idris, I., A. Selamat, and S. Omatu. 2014. “Hybrid email spam detection model with negative selection algorithm and differential evolution.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 28 (Feb): 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2013.12.001.
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. 2021. H.R. 3684. Public law No 117-58, 1039. Washington, DC: US Congress.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2021. Climate change 2021. Geneva: IPCC.
Jensen, W. A., B. B. Brown, K. R. Smith, S. C. Brewer, J. W. Amburgey, and B. McIff. 2017. “Active transportation on a complete street: Perceived and audited walkability correlates.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14 (9): 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091014.
Khadjeh Nassirtoussi, A., S. Aghabozorgi, T. Ying Wah, and D. C. L. Ngo. 2014. “Text mining for market prediction: A systematic review.” Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (16): 7653–7670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.06.009.
Kuhn, K. D. 2018. “Using structural topic modeling to identify latent topics and trends in aviation incident reports.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 87 (Dec): 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.12.018.
Labi, S., A. Faiz, T. U. Saeed, B. N. T. Alabi, and W. Woldemariam. 2019. “Connectivity, accessibility, and mobility relationships in the context of low-Volume road networks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (12): 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119854091.
Lamb, W. F., et al. 2021. “A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 To 2018.” Environ. Res. Lett. 16 (7): 073005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e.
Lau, R. Y. K. 2017. “Toward a social sensor based framework for intelligent transportation.” In Proc., 18th IEEE Int. Symp on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Litman, T. 2021. Evaluating transportation equity: Guidance for incorporating distributional impacts in transportation planning. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Liu, F., F. Zhao, Z. Liu, and H. Hao. 2019. “Can autonomous vehicle reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A country-level evaluation.” Energy Policy 132 (Jun): 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.013.
Liu, K., and N. El-Gohary. 2017. “Ontology-based semi-supervised conditional random fields for automated information extraction from bridge inspection reports.” Autom. Constr. 81 (Sep): 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.02.003.
Lv, X., and N. El-Gohary. 2017. “Stakeholder opinion classification for supporting large-scale transportation project decision making.” In Proc., Int. Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Maddox, T. 2018. How autonomous vehicles could save over 350K lives in the US and millions worldwide. Indian Land, SC: Ziff Davis Network.
Masood, T., D. McFarlane, A. K. Parlikad, J. Dora, A. Ellis, and J. Schooling. 2016. “Towards the future-proofing ng of UK infrastructure.” Infrastruct. Asset Manage. 3 (1): 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.15.00006.
McBride, J., and J. Moss. 2020. The state of U. S. infrastructure. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Michigan DOT. 2016. Moving Michigan forward: 2040 state long-range transportation plan. Lansing, MI: Michigan DOT.
Mostafavi, A., D. Abraham, D. DeLaurentis, J. Sinfield, A. Kandil, and C. Queiroz. 2016. “Agent-based simulation model for assessment of financing scenarios in highway transportation infrastructure systems.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (2): 04015012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000482.
Nevada DOT. 2008. Statewide transportation plan—Moving Nevada through 2028. Carson City, NV: Nevada DOT Intermodal Planning Division.
New Mexico DOT. 2015. The New Mexico 2040 plan. Santa Fe, NM: New Mexico DOT Asset Management and Planning Division.
North Carolina DOT. 2012. North Carolina statewide transportation plan. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina DOT.
Northwest IOWA Planning and Development Commission. 2012. 2031 long range transportation plan. Spencer, IA: Northwest IOWA Planning and Development Commission Transportation Policy Committee.
Oklahoma DOT. 2010. The 2010-2035 Oklahoma long range transportation plan. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma DOT Planning and Research Division.
Oswald Beiler, M. R., and C. Treat. 2015. “Integrating GIS and AHP to prioritize transportation infrastructure using sustainability metrics.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21 (3): 04014053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000245.
Pais, J. C., S. I. R. Amorim, and M. J. C. Minhoto. 2013. “Impact of traffic overload on road pavement performance.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (9): 873–879. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000571.
Park, S. H., J. Synn, O. H. Kwon, and Y. Sung. 2018. “Apriori-based text mining method for the advancement of the transportation management plan in expressway work zones.” J. Supercomput. 74 (3): 1283–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2142-3.
Pendyala, V. S., Y. Fang, J. Holliday, and A. Zalzala. 2014. “A text mining approach to automated healthcare for the masses.” In Proc., 4th IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conf., 28–35. New York: IEEE.
Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability. 2018. 2035 comprehensive plan. Portland, OR: The Government of Portland.
Radopoulou, S. C., I. Brilakis, K. Doycheva, and C. Koch. 2016. “A framework for automated pavement condition monitoring.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016, 770–779. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Rahman, M. S., M. Abdel-Aty, J. Lee, and M. H. Rahman. 2019. “Safety benefits of arterials’ crash risk under connected and automated vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 100 (Jan): 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.029.
Rao, K., and S. Dey. 2011. “Decision support for E-Governance: A text mining approach.” Int. J. Manage. Inf. Technol. 3 (3): 73–91. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmit.2011.3307.
Rasoulkhani, K., L. Brannen, J. Zhu, A. Mostafavi, E. Jaselskis, R. Stoa, Q. Li, A. Alsharef, S. Banerjee, and S. Chowdhury. 2020. “Establishing a future-proofing framework for infrastructure projects to proactively adapt to complex regulatory landscapes.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (4): 04020032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000794.
Ren, Z., G. Fusco, N. Lownes, and J. Zhu. 2022. “Entropy-based diversity quantification of multimodal transportation systems: Physical infrastructure perspective versus travel behavior perspective.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 148 (2019): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000855.
Reynolds, C. C. O., M. A. Harris, K. Teschke, P. A. Cripton, and M. Winters. 2009. “The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: A review of the literature.” Environ. Health Global Access Sci. Source 8 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-8-47.
Rubin, V. 2009. Making equity and inclusion central to federal transportation policy. Oakland, CA: PolicyLink.
Sammouri, W., E. Côme, L. Oukhellou, P. Aknin, C. E. Fonlladosa, and K. Prendergast. 2012. “Temporal association rule mining for the preventive diagnosis of onboard subsystems within floating train data framework.” In Proc., Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1351–1356. New York: IEEE.
Seattle DOT. 2015. Move Seattle: 10-Year strategic vision for transportation. Seattle: Seattle DOT.
Seattle DOT. 2017. City of Seattle pedestrian master plan. Seattle: Seattle DOT.
Shaheen, S., and A. Cohen. 2019. “Shared ride services in North America: Definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling.” Transp. Rev. 39 (4): 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1497728.
Soteropoulos, A., M. Berger, and F. Ciari. 2019. “Impacts of automated vehicles on travel behaviour and land use: An international review of modelling studies.” Transp. Rev. 39 (1): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1523253.
State of Alaska Transportation & Public Facilities. 2016. Alaska statewide long-range transportation plan: Let’s keep moving 2036. Juneau, AK: State of Alaska Transportation & Public Facilities.
Sun, W., P. Bocchini, and B. D. Davison. 2020. “Resilience metrics and measurement methods for transportation infrastructure: The state of the art.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 5 (3): 168–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2018.1448663.
Tyson, A., and B. Kennedy. 2020. Two-thirds of Americans think government should do more on climate. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center Science & Society.
USDOT. 2021. Overview of funding and financing at USDOT. Washinton, DC: USDOT.
Utah DOT. 2015. 2015-2040 long-range transportation plan. Taylorsville, UT: Utah DOT.
Wall, T. A., W. E. Walker, V. A. W. J. Marchau, and L. Bertolini. 2015. “Dynamic adaptive approach to transportation-infrastructure planning for climate change: San-Francisco-Bay-Area case study.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21 (4): 05015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000257.
Wang, K., and X. Wang. 2021. “Generational differences in automobility: Comparing America’s millennials and gen Xers using gradient boosting decision trees.” Cities 114 (Mar): 103204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103204.
Wang, L., X. Xue, Z. Zhao, and Z. Wang. 2018. “The impacts of transportation infrastructure on sustainable development: Emerging trends and challenges.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (6): 1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061172.
Wang, Y., and J. E. Taylor. 2019. “DUET: Data-driven approach based on latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 33 (3): 04019023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000819.
Wang, Z., and J. Yin. 2020. “Risk assessment of inland waterborne transportation using data mining.” Marit. Policy Manage. 47 (5): 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1738582.
Washington DOT. 2017. Washington transportation plan (WTP), phase 2—Implementation. Olympia, WA: Washington DOT Multimodal Planning Division.
White House. 2021. President Biden’s bipartisan infrastructure law. Washington, DC: White House.
Wisconsin DOT. 2009. Connections 2030: Statewide long-range transportation plan. Madison, WI: Wisconsin DOT.
Zhao, Z., H. Guo, D. Coyle, F. Robinson, and L. Munnich. 2015. “Revisiting the fuel tax–based transportation funding system in the United States.” Public Work Manage. Policy 20 (2): 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X14539139.
Zhao, Z., H. N. Koutsopoulos, and J. Zhao. 2020. “Discovering latent activity patterns from transit smart card data: A spatiotemporal topic model.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 116 (Feb): 102627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102627.
Zhou, Y., J. Wang, and H. Yang. 2019. “Resilience of transportation systems: Concepts and comprehensive review.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 20 (12): 4262–4276. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2883766.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 37Issue 1January 2023

History

Received: Jan 30, 2022
Accepted: Aug 1, 2022
Published online: Sep 30, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sudipta Chowdhury, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Rd., Storrs, CT 06269. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Rd., Storrs, CT 06269 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1005-5841. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Assessing Community Needs in Disasters: Transfer Learning for Fusing Limited Georeferenced Data from Crowdsourced Applications on the Community Level, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6208, 40, 6, (2024).
  • Protecting Critical Infrastructure for Disasters: NLP-Based Automated Information Retrieval to Generate Hypothetical Cyberattack Scenarios, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2407, 30, 3, (2024).
  • Uncovering Critical Causes of Highway Work Zone Accidents Using Unsupervised Machine Learning and Social Network Analysis, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13952, 150, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share