Technical Papers
Sep 30, 2022

Analyzing Schedule Dependency and Sequencing Changes for Robotic Construction Using Graph Analysis

Publication: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 1

Abstract

A construction schedule consists of activities and their sequencing. The impact of using robots in construction projects goes beyond a single activity, and affects an entire sequence of activities because of the difference between humans and robots in physical characteristics, work constraints, and work performance. The interdependency among construction activities complicates schedule change analysis through change propagation. This study developed a method for analyzing the impacts of using robots as alternative methods in construction projects. The study aimed to understand the impacts of employing robots in construction scheduling and analyzing schedule change propagation. We first summarize the typical construction sequence dependencies and their causes based on extant literature. Then, we analyze the impact of emerging or currently used site construction robots on these dependencies based on robots’ characteristics and work methods, as well as the potential propagation of changes through the activity dependency network using graph theory. A case study project is analyzed to compare the proposed use of robotic construction against the actual methods used in the project, and to understand the changes with and without robotics to analyze the sequence differences. The output of this research is a defined graph-based process for tracking changes in a network dependency schedule, and a clear definition of four types of schedule changes incurred by use of construction robotics in construction sequences.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Penn State Institute for Computational and Data Sciences (ICDS). This material is based on work supported by the NSF under Grant No. 1928626 and the Seed Grant from ICDS. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF and Penn State ICDS.

References

Ali, A. K., O. J. Lee, and H. Song. 2021. “Robot-based façade spatial assembly optimization.” J. Build. Eng. 33: 101556.
Barnat, J., L. Brim, and P. Rockai. 2010. “Parallel partial order reduction with topological sort proviso.” In Proc., 2010 8th IEEE Int. Conf. on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, 222–231. New York, NY: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/sefm.2010.35.
Bartlett, K., J. L. Blanco, B. Fitzgerald, J. Johnson, A. L. Mullin, and M. J. Ribeirinho. 2020. “Rise of the platform era: The next chapter in construction technology.” Accessed September 11, 2022. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/private-equity-and-principal-investors/our-insights/rise-of-the-platform-era-the-next-chapter-in-construction-technology.
Bogue, R. 2018. “What are the prospects for robots in the construction industry?” Ind. Robot-An Int. J. 45 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/IR-11-2017-0194.
Borgatti, S. P., and D. S. Halgin. 2011. “On network theory.” Organ. Sci. 22 (5): 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0641.
Brosque, C., G. Skeie, and M. Fischer. 2021. “Comparative analysis of manual and robotic concrete drilling for installation hangers.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (3): 05021001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002002.
Brosque, C., G. Skeie, J. Orn, J. Jacobson, T. Lau, and M. Fischer. 2020. “Comparison of construction robots and traditional methods for drilling, drywall, and layout tasks.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications: HORA 2020. New York, NY: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HORA49412.2020.9152871.
Carlson, A. 2017. “Deregulation, apprenticeships, and automation.” Constr. Account. Taxation 27 (4): 37–42.
Davtalab, O., A. Kazemian, and B. Khoshnevis. 2019. “Perspectives on a BIM-integrated software platform for robotic construction through contour crafting.” Autom. Constr. 89 (May): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.01.006.
Delgado Davila, J. M., L. Oyedele, A. Ajayi, L. Akanbi, O. Akinade, M. Bilal, and H. Owolabi. 2019. “Robotics and automated systems in construction: Understanding industry-specific challenges for adoption.” J. Build. Eng. 26 (Nov): 100868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100868.
Ding, L., W. Jiang, Y. Zhou, C. Zhou, and S. Liu. 2020. “BIM-based task-level planning for robotic brick assembly through image-based 3D modeling.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 43: 100993.
Frey, C. B., and M. A. Osborne. 2017. “The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization?” J. Technol. Forecasting Social Change 114 (Jan): 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.
García de Soto, B., I. Agustí-Juan, J. Hunhevicz, S. Joss, K. Graser, G. Habert, and B. T. Adey. 2018. “Productivity of digital fabrication in construction: Cost and time analysis of a robotically built wall.” Autom. Constr. 92 (Aug): 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.04.004.
Gould, F. E., and N. Joyce. 2009. Construction project management. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hartmann, T., J. Gao, and M. Fischer. 2008. “Areas of application for 3D and 4D models on construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (10): 776–785. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:10(776).
Hu, Y., D. Castro-Lacouture, C. M. Eastman, and S. B. Navathe. 2021. Component change list prediction for BIM-based clash resolution from a Graph perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (8): 04021085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002092.
Kim, S., M. Peavy, P. C. Huang, and K. Kim. 2021. “Development of BIM-integrated construction robot task planning and simulation system.” Autom. Constr. 127 (Jul): 103720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103720.
Levitt, E. R., J. C. Kunz, and N. A. Kartam. 1987. “Using artificial intelligence techniques for automated planning and scheduling.” In Proc., IAARC. London, UK: International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction.
Montaser, A., and O. Moselhi. 2015. “Methodology for automated generation of 4D BIM.” In Proc., 5th Int./11th Construction Specialty Conf. Pointe Claire, QC: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Pennsylvania State University. n.d. “Our location.” Accessed January 27, 2022. https://navyyard.psu.edu/this-is-penn-state-navy-yard/location.
Pradhananga, P., M. ElZomor, and G. Santi Kasabdji. 2021. “Identifying the challenges to adopting robotics in the US construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (5): 05021003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002007.
Sigalov, K., and M. König. 2017. “Recognition of process patterns for BIM-based construction schedules.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 33 (Aug): 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.12.003.
Skibniewski, M. J., K. Tamaki, and J. Thomaz. 1992. “Construction robotics management with a personal computer.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 9th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 421–430. London, UK: International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction. https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC1992/0052.
Son, H., C. Kim, H. Kim, M. K. Kim, and S. H. Han. 2010. “Trend analysis of research and development on automation and robotics technology in the construction industry.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 14 (2): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0131-7.
Sousa, J. P., P. Azambuja Varela, and P. F. Martins. 2015. “Between manual and robotic approaches to brick construction in architecture.” In Proc., 33rd ECAADe Conf.: Real Time, 361–370. Brussels, Belgium: Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe.
Staub-French, S., and A. Aanzode. 2007. “3D and 4D modeling for design and construction coordination: Issues and lessons learned.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 12 (26): 381–407. https://www.itcon.org/paper/2007/26.
Teicholz, P. 2004. “Labor productivity declines in the construction industry: Causes and remedies.” AECbytes Viewpoint 4 (14): 2004. https://www.acebytes.com/viewpoint/2013/issue_67.html.
Terouhid, D. 2019. “Mandatory, discretionary, scenario-based, and improper activity relationships: Theoretical and practical considerations [Web log post].” Accessed April 12, 2021. https://www.adroitprojectconsultants.com/tag/activity-relationship-types/.
Usmanov, V., M. Bruzl, S. Pavel, and R. Šulc. 2017. “Modelling of industrial robotic brick system.” In Proc., 34th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction: ISARC 2017, 1013–1021. London, UK: International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction. https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2017/0140.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 37Issue 1January 2023

History

Received: Feb 21, 2022
Accepted: Jul 14, 2022
Published online: Sep 30, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3128-5849. Email: [email protected]
Yuqing Hu, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Robert M. Leicht, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802. Email: [email protected]
Clinton Suanico [email protected]
Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share