Implementing a Choosing-by-Advantages Decision-Making Method to Evaluate the Critical Success Factors of Mass-Timber Building Materials in the US
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148, Issue 10
Abstract
Construction projects often involve numerous decision-making activities during the design and operation phases. The decision-making process in the construction industry sometimes does not follow an organized manner, and often, decisions are made without having any systematic approach. An important element of a construction project is to select the most preferred building material. The construction operation process is known for its high energy intensity and negative environmental impacts on surrounding areas. Therefore, a quest for sustainable and value-generating building materials has long been overdue. This study proposes a multicriteria decision-making framework called Choosing by Advantages (CBA) to analyze some critical success factors associated with the decision-making process of a novel building material called mass timber. Mass timber is a sustainable and environmentally friendly building material, which has gained wide acceptance in European construction market. However, in the US, the majority of the construction practitioners are hesitant to use mass timber as a mainstream building material. This study aims to bridge the knowledge gap on mass timber and implement a decision-making framework to evaluate the constructability factors of mass timber in comparison with the two most traditional building materials in the US: concrete and steel. A questionnaire survey was distributed among the US construction practitioners experienced with all three materials. The outcomes of the study suggested that concrete is currently the most preferred and value-generating building material in the US construction industry based on eight predefined critical factors. Although mass timber is not the most preferred material for now, it has strong potential to be the most preferred building material in the future. The outcomes of the study will be helpful for the industry stakeholders to analyze the prospect of mass-timber building materials in the US construction industry. Furthermore, it will strengthen the decision-making process of construction operations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Abeysundara, U. G. Y., S. Babel, and S. Gheewala. 2009. “A matrix in life cycle perspective for selecting sustainable materials for buildings in Sri Lanka.” Build. Environ. 44 (5): 997–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.005.
Abraham, K., M. Lepech, and J. Haymaker. 2013. “Selection and application of choosing by advantages on a corporate campus project.” In Proc., 21th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 21), edited by C. T. Formoso and P. Tzortzopoulos, 349–358. Fortaleza, Brazil: International Group for Lean Construction.
Ahmed, S., and I. Arocho. 2019. “Emission of particulate matters (PM) during construction: A comparative study on a cross-laminated timber (CLT) and a steel building project.” J. Build. Eng. 22 (Mar): 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.12.015.
Ahmed, S., and I. Arocho. 2020. “Mass timber building materials in the U.S. construction industry: Determining the existing awareness level, construction-related challenges, and recommendations to increase its current acceptance level.” Cleaner Eng. Technol. 1 (Dec): 100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2020.100007.
Ahmed, S., and I. Arocho. 2021a. “Analysis of cost comparison and effects of change orders during construction: Study of mass timber and a concrete building project.” J. Build. Eng. 33 (Jan): 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101856.
Ahmed, S., and I. Arocho. 2021b. “Feasibility assessment of mass timber as a mainstream building material in the US construction industry Level of involvement, existing challenges, and recommendations.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 26 (2): 04021008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000574.
Akadiri, P. O., E. A. Chinyio, and P. O. Olomolaiye. 2012. “Design of a sustainable building: a conceptual framework for implementing sustainability in the building sector.” Buildings 2 (2): 126–152. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2020126.
Alzahrani, J., and M. W. Emsley. 2013. “The impact of contractors’ attributes on construction project success: A post-construction evaluation.” Int. J. Project Manage. 31 (2): 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.006.
Arroyo, P., I. D. Tommelein, and G. Ballard. 2014. “Comparing AHP and CBA as decision methods to resolve the choosing problem in detailed design.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (1): 04014063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000915.
Arroyo, P., I. D. Tommelein, and G. Ballard. 2016a. “Selecting globally sustainable materials: A case study using choosing by advantages.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 05015015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001041.
Arroyo, P., I. D. Tommelein, G. Ballard, and P. Rumsey. 2016b. “Choosing by advantages: A case study for selecting a HVAC system for a net zero energy museum.” Energy Build. 111 (Jan): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.023.
Basbagill, J., F. Flager, M. Lepech, and M. Fischer. 2013. “Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts.” Build. Environ. 60 (Feb): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.009.
Berardi, U. 2013. “Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 8 (Oct): 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.008.
Borjen, Y., S. Gagnon, T. Williamson, and C. Pirvu. 2012. “The cross-laminated timber standard on North America.” In Proc., World Conf. on Timber Engineering. Santiago, Chile: World Conference on Timber Engineering.
Chan, A. P. C., and A. P. L. Chan. 2004. “Key performance indicator for measuring construction success.” Benchmarking: Int. J. 11 (2): 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770410532624.
Crampton, A. 2017. “Cross-laminated timber: An innovative building material takes hold in Oregon.” Accessed June 16, 2022. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116&context=metroscape.
Crespell, P., and S. Gagnon. 2011. Cross-laminated timber: A primer. Vancouver, BC, Canada: FPInnovations.
Fan, W., and Z. Yan. 2010. “Factors affecting rates of the web survey: A systematic review.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 26 (2): 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015.
Fischer, M., and H. Adams. 2011. “Engineering-based decision in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (10): 751–754. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000304.
Gurgun, A. P., and K. Koc. 2022. “Administrative risk challenging the adoption of smart contracts in construction projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (2): 989–1015. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0678.
Invidiata, A., M. Lavagna, and E. Ghisi. 2018. “Selecting design strategies using multi-criteria decision making to improve the sustainability of buildings.” Build. Environ. 139 (58–68): 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.041.
Karacabeyli, C., and C. Lum. 2014. “Technical guide for the design and construction of tall wood buildings in Canada.” Accessed June 12, 2022. https://library.fpinnovations.ca/en/permalink/fpipub42991.
Karakhan, A., J. Gambatese, and S. Rajendran. 2016. “Application of choosing by advantages decision-making system to select fall protection measure.” In Proc., 24th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction. Taipei City: Univ. and Research Institutions in Taiwan.
Lean Construction Blog. 2015. “Step by step guide to applying choosing by advantages.” Accessed February 10, 2022. https://leanconstructionblog.com/applying-choosing-by-advantages-step-by-step.html.
Mallo, M., and O. Espinoza. 2015. “Awareness, perceptions and willingness to adopt cross-laminated timber by the architect community in the United States.” J. Cleaner Prod. 94 (May): 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.090.
McLain, R. 2015. “Getting down to business: The cost/value proposition of timber offices.” Accessed April 18, 2021. http://www.woodworks.org/wp-content/uploads/presentation_slides-MCLAIN-PART-1-The-Cost-Value-Proposition-of-Timber-Offices-AIA-2018.pdf.
Melchert, L. 2007. “The Dutch sustainable building policy: A model for developing countries?” Build. Environ. 42 (2): 893–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.10.007.
Mohammadi, J., and L. Ling. 2017. “Can wood become an alternative material for tall building construction?” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 22 (4): 04017014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000334.
NCSU (NC State Extension Publications). 2018. “Mass timber products: Innovative wood-based building materials.” Accessed April 18, 2021. https://content.ces.ncsu.edu/mass-timber-products-innovative-wood-based-building-materials.
Nnaji, C., H. W. Lee, A. Karakhan, and J. Gambatese. 2018. “Developing a decision-making framework to select safety technologies for highway construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (4): 04018016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001466.
Oehlberg, L., R. Shelby, and A. Agogino. 2010. “Sustainable product design: Designing for diversity in engineering education.” Int. J. Eng. Educ. 26 (2): 489–498.
Parviz, F. R. 2003. “Project success attributes.” J. Cost Eng. 45 (4): 23–28.
Pei, S., D. Rammer, M. Popovski, T. Williamson, P. Line, and J. Van de Lindt. 2016. “An overview of CLT research and implementation in North America.” In Proc., 2016 World Conf. on Timber Engineering. Santiago, Chile: World Conference on Timber Engineering.
Racher, P., K. Laplanche, D. Dhima, and A. Bouchaïr. 2010. “Thermo-mechanical analysis of the fire performance of dowelled timber connection.” Eng. Struct. 32 (4): 1148–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.041choosing-by-advantages-step-by-step.html.
Sigurour, S. F. 2009. “Critical success factor in project management: An ethical perspective.” In School of engineering and natural sciences. Reykjavík, Iceland: Univ. of Iceland.
Steinfort, P., and D. Walker. 2007. “Critical success factors in project management globally and how they may be applied to aid projects.” In Proc., PMOZ Achieving Excellence—4th Annual Project Management Australia Conference, edited by Baccarini, 28–31. Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Suhr, J. 1999. The choosing by advantages decision making system. Westport, CT: Quorum.
Sun, S., Z. Zhao, and J. Shen. 2020. “Effects of manufacturing conditions on the VOCs emissions of particleboard.” Bioresources 15 (1): 1074–1084. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.1.1074-1084.
Takano, A., M. Hughes, and S. Winter. 2014. “A multidisciplinary approach to sustainable building material selection: A case study in a finish context.” Build. Environ. 82 (Dec): 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.09.026.
Thormark, C. 2006. “The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building.” Build. Environ. 41 (8): 1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.026.
Walsh, N. I. 2019. “Top 300 architecture firms in the USA for 2019.” Accessed February 10, 2022. https://www.archdaily.com/920391/top-300-architecture-firms-in-the-usa-for-2019.
Yale Environment360. 2019. “As mass timber takes off, how green is this new building material?” Accessed June 16, 2022. https://e360.yale.edu/features/as-mass-timber-takes-off-how-green-is-this-new-building-material.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148 • Issue 10 • October 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 13, 2021
Accepted: May 2, 2022
Published online: Jul 28, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 28, 2022
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Building materials
- Buildings
- Business management
- Construction engineering
- Construction industry
- Construction management
- Construction materials
- Decision making
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Materials engineering
- Practice and Profession
- Structural engineering
- Structures (by type)
- Wood and wood products
- Wood structures
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Shafayet Ahmed, Ziyu Jin, Methodology to Measure the Efficiency of Scientific Decision-Making Frameworks to Select Preferred Building Materials, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485286.043, (423-434), (2024).