Abstract

Railways are an efficient transport mode, but building and maintaining railway tracks has a significant environmental impact in terms of CO2 emissions and use of raw materials. This is particularly true for slab tracks, which require large quantities of concrete. They are also more expensive to build than conventional ballasted tracks, but require less maintenance and have other advantages that make them a good alternative, especially for high-speed lines. To contribute to more sustainable railways, this paper aims to optimize the design of one of the most common slab track typologies: RHEDA 2000. The main objective is to reduce the amount of concrete required to build the slab without compromising its performance and durability. To do so, a model based on finite-element method (FEM) of the track was used, paired with a kriging metamodel to allow analyzing multiple options of slab thickness and concrete strength in a timely manner. By means of kriging, optimal solutions were obtained and then validated through the FEM model to ensure that predefined mechanical and geometrical constraints were met. Starting from an initial setup with a 30-cm slab made of concrete with a characteristic strength of 40 MPa, an optimized solution was reached, consisting of a 24-cm slab made of concrete with a strength of 45 MPa, which yields a cost reduction of 17.5%. This process may be now applied to other slab typologies to obtain more sustainable designs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, including the kriging code in MATLAB and FEM in ANSYS.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Joaquin J. Pons for his work, which was extremely helpful in the development of this paper. This project was supported by Grant PID2020-117056RB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe.”

References

ADIF (Administrador de Infraestructura Ferroviaria). 2000. “Sistemas de vía sobre base de hormigón y tacos prefabricados.” Accessed July 28, 2021. http://descargas.adif.es/ade/u18/GCN/NormativaTecnica.nsf.
Åkerman, J. 2011. “The role of high-speed rail in mitigating climate change—The Swedish case Europabanan from a life cycle perspective.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 16 (3): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.12.004.
Ata-Ali, N., V. Penadés-Plà, D. Martínez-Muñoz, and V. Yepes. 2021. “Recycled versus non-recycled insulation alternatives: LCA analysis for different climatic conditions in Spain.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 175 (Dec): 105838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105838.
Biles, W. E., J. P. C. Kleijnen, W. C. M. van Beers, and I. van Nieuwenhuyse. 2007. “Kriging metamodeling in constrained simulation optimization: An explorative study.” In Proc., 2007 Winter Simulation Conf., 355–362. New York: IEEE.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Design of concrete structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Eurocode 2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Connolly, D., A. Giannopoulos, and M. C. Forde. 2013. “Numerical modelling of ground borne vibrations from high speed rail lines on embankments.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 46 (Mar): 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.12.003.
Cortina Ruiz, E. 2013. “La utilización de la vía en placa en líneas de alta velocidad: Aplicación práctica.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Transport Infrastructure and Territory, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
Dette, H., and A. Pepelyshev. 2010. “Generalized Latin hypercube design for computer experiments.” Technometrics 52 (4): 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1198/TECH.2010.09157.
Eaton, J., S. Yang, and M. Gongora. 2017. “Ant colony optimization for simulated dynamic multi-objective railway junction rescheduling.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 18 (11): 2980–2992. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2665042.
Esveld, C. 2001. Modern railway track. 2nd ed. Delft, Netherlands: TU Delft.
European Commission. 2018. “A clean planet for all. A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy.” Accessed April 6, 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0773.
European Commission. 2020. EU transport in figures—Statistical pocketbook 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Ferdous, W., A. Manalo, R. Siddique, P. Mendis, Y. Zhuge, H. S. Wong, W. Lokuge, T. Aravinthan, and P. Schubel. 2021. “Recycling of landfill wastes (tyres, plastics and glass) in construction—A review on global waste generation, performance, application and future opportunities.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 173 (Oct): 105745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105745.
Fernández, A., A. Fernández-Cardador, P. Cucala, M. Domínguez, and T. Gonsalves. 2015. “Design of robust and energy-efficient ATO speed profiles of metropolitan lines considering train load variations and delays.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 16 (4): 2061–2071. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2391831.
Frischknecht, R., and G. Rebitzer. 2005. “The ecoinvent database system: A comprehensive web-based LCA database.” J. Cleaner Prod. 13 (13–14): 1337–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.05.002.
García-Segura, T., V. Penadés-Plà, and V. Yepes. 2018. “Sustainable bridge design by metamodel-assisted multi-objective optimization and decision-making under uncertainty.” J. Cleaner Prod. 202 (Nov): 904–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.177.
Gautier, P.-E. 2015. “Slab track: Review of existing systems and optimization potentials including very high speed.” Constr. Build. Mater. 92 (Sep): 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.102.
Ghasemalizadeh, O., S. Khaleghian, and S. Taheri. 2016. “A review of optimization techniques in artificial networks.” Int. J. Adv. Res. 4 (9): 1668–1686. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/1627.
Goedkoop, M., R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, A. De Scheryver, J. Struijs, and R. van Zelm. 2009. “ReCiPe 2008: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level.” In In Report I: Characterisation. 1st ed. The Hague, Netherlands: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
Hall, L. 2003. “Simulations and analyses of train-induced ground vibrations in finite element models.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 23 (5): 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00209-9.
Hidalgo Signes, C., P. Martínez Fernández, E. Medel Perallón, and R. Insa Franco. 2016. “Characterisation of an unbound granular mixture with waste tyre rubber for subballast layers.” Mater. Struct. 48: 3847–3861. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0443-z.
Jakubek, D., and C. Wagner. 2016. “Aerodynamic shape optimization of train heads using adjoint-based computational fluid dynamics with different objective functions.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance. Stirling, UK: Civil-Comp Press.
Jin, Q., D. J. Thompson, D. E. J. Lurcock, M. G. R. Toward, and E. Ntotsios. 2018. “A 2.5D finite element and boundary element model for the ground vibration from trains in tunnels and validation using measurement data.” J. Sound Vib. 422 (May): 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.02.019.
Kaewunruen, S., J. Sresakoolchai, and J. Peng. 2020. “Life cycle cost, energy and carbon assessments of Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway.” Sustainability 12 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010206.
Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. “Optimization by simulated annealing.” Science 220 (4598): 671–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671.
Kortazar, A., G. Bueno, and D. Hoyos. 2021. “Dataset for the life cycle assessment of the high speed rail network in Spain.” Data Brief 36 (Jun): 107006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107006.
Li, L., S. Nimbalkar, and R. Zhong. 2018. “Finite element model of ballasted railway with infinite boundaries considering effects of moving train loads and Rayleigh waves.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 114 (Nov): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.06.033.
Lichtberger, B. 2011. Track compendium. 2nd ed. Hamburg, Germany: DVV Media Group GmbH.
Lophaven, S. N., H. B. Nielsen, and J. Sondergaard. 2002. “DACE—A Matlab kriging toolbox, version 2.0.” Accessed July 5, 2021. http://www.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/p.php?3213.
Martínez Fernández, P., P. Salvador Zuriaga, I. Villalba Sanchís, and R. Insa Franco. 2019a. “Neural networks for modelling the energy consumption of metro trains.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 234 (7): 722–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409719861595.
Martínez Fernández, P., I. Villalba Sanchís, F. Botello, and R. Insa Franco. 2013. “Monitoring and analysis of vibration transmission for various track typologies. A case study.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 24 (Oct): 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.05.003.
Martínez Fernández, P., I. Villalba Sanchís, V. Yepes, and R. Insa Franco. 2019b. “A review of modelling and optimisation methods applied to railways energy consumption.” J. Cleaner Prod. 222 (Jun): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.037.
Matheron, G. 1963. “Principles of geostatistics.” Econ. Geol. 58 (8): 1246–1266. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246.
Medina, J. R. 2001. “Estimation of incident and reflected waves using simulated annealing.” J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 127 (4): 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2001)127:4(213).
Michas, G. 2012. “Slab track systems for high-speed railways.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Transport Science, Royal Institute of Technology.
Ministerio de Fomento. 1999. Recomendaciones para el proyecto de plataformas ferroviarias. 1st ed. Madrid, Spain: Centro de Publicaciones Secretaría General Técnica Ministerio de Fomento.
Mohamad, N., K. Muthusamy, R. Embong, A. Kusbiantoro, and M. H. Hashim. 2021. “Environmental impact of cement production and solutions: A review.” Mater. Today: Proc. 48 (4): 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.212.
Myers, R. H., D. C. Montgomery, and C. M. Anderson-Cook. 2016. Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Olsson, A., G. Sandberg, and O. Dahlblom. 2003. “On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis.” Struct. Saf. 25 (1): 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00039-5.
Penadés-Plà, V., T. García-Segura, and V. Yepes. 2019. “Accelerated optimization method for low-embodied energy concrete box-girder bridge design.” Eng. Struct. 17 (Jan): 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.015.
Penadés-Plà, V., T. García-Segura, and V. Yepes. 2020a. “Robust design optimization for low-cost concrete box-girder bridge.” Mathematics 8 (3): 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8030398.
Penadés-Plà, V., V. Yepes, and T. García-Segura. 2020b. “Robust decision-making design for sustainable pedestrian concrete bridges.” Eng. Struct. 209 (Apr): 109968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109968.
Pita, A. L., P. F. Teixeira, and F. Robuste. 2004. “High speed and track deterioration: The role of vertical stiffness of the track.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 218 (1): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440904322804411.
Pons, J. J., V. Penadés-Plà, V. Yepes, and J. V. Martí. 2018. “Life cycle assessment of earth-retaining walls: An environmental comparison.” J. Cleaner Prod. 192 (Aug): 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.268.
Pons, J. J., I. Villalba Sanchis, R. Insa Franco, and V. Yepes. 2020. “Life cycle assessment of a railway tracks substructures: Comparison of ballast and ballastless rail tracks.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 85 (Nov): 106444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106444.
Sayeed, M. A., and M. A. Shahin. 2016. “Three-dimensional numerical modelling of ballasted railway track foundations for high-speed trains with special reference to critical speed.” Transp. Geotech. 6 (Mar): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.01.003.
Selig, E. T., and J. M. Waters. 1994. Track geotechnology and substructure management. London: Thomas Telford.
Simpson, T. W., T. M. Mauery, J. J. Korte, and F. Mistree. 2001. “Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization.” AIAA J. 39 (12): 2233–2241. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1234.
Tuchschmid, M., W. Knörr, A. Schach, and M. Mottschall. 2011. Carbon footprint and environmental impact of railway infrastructure. Paris: Union Internationale des Chemins de fer.
UIC (Union Internationale des Chemins de fer). 2008. Earthworks and track bed for railway lines. UIC Leaflet 719R. Paris: UIC.
Villalba Sanchis, I., R. Insa Franco, P. Martínez Fernández, and P. Salvador Zuriaga. 2021. “Experimental and numerical investigations of dual gauge railway track behaviour.” Constr. Build. Mater. 299 (Sep): 123943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123943.
Wang, B., L. Yan, Q. Fu, and B. Kasal. 2021. “A comprehensive review on recycled aggregate and recycled aggregate concrete.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 171 (Aug): 105565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105565.
Woods, D. C., and S. M. Lewis. 2017. “Design of experiments for screening.” In Handbook of uncertainty quantification, 1143–1185. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Ye, Y., and Y. Sun. 2021. “Reducing wheel wear from the perspective of rail track layout optimization.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part K: J. Multi-body Dyn. 235 (2): 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464419320956831.
Ye, Y., Y. Sun, S. Dongfang, D. Shi, and M. Hecht. 2021. “Optimizing wheel profiles and suspensions for railway vehicles operating on specific lines to reduce wheel wear: A case study.” Multibody Syst. Dyn. 51 (1): 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-020-09722-4.
Zhao, Y., X. Li, Q. Lv, H. Jiao, X. Xiao, and X. Jin. 2017. “Measuring, modelling and optimising an embedded rail track.” Appl. Acoust. 116 (Jan): 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.07.021.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148Issue 7July 2022

History

Received: Sep 7, 2021
Accepted: Feb 8, 2022
Published online: Apr 28, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 28, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Civil Engineer, Dept. of Transport Engineering and Infrastructure, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8246-2510. Email: [email protected]
Civil Engineer, Dept. of Transport Engineering and Infrastructure, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4091-8719. Email: [email protected]
Ricardo Insa Franco, Ph.D. [email protected]
Civil Engineer, Dept. of Transport Engineering and Infrastructure, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain. Email: [email protected]
Víctor Yepes, Ph.D. [email protected]
Civil Engineer, Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Hormigón (ICITECH), Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Camino de Vera, s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Analytic Network Process-Based Sustainability Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete Bridges in Coastal Regions, Sustainability, 10.3390/su141710688, 14, 17, (10688), (2022).
  • CO2-Optimization of Post-Tensioned Concrete Slab-Bridge Decks Using Surrogate Modeling, Materials, 10.3390/ma15144776, 15, 14, (4776), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share