Abstract

Risk information that is used during project risk identification and assessment should be communicated well to enable risk-informed decision making. This study aimed to use risk descriptors for risk contextualization and explore how visualization can improve the communication of project risk information. Risk descriptors (e.g., assumptions and controllability) were identified, and two workshops were held to verify the selected descriptors and explore the effectiveness of visualizations for risk communication. The first workshop was designed to assess the perceptions of different risk experts, and the second workshop was a case study application to evaluate the usability of risk visualization. Qualitative analysis of the first workshop revealed four themes, specifically standardization, representation, customization, and practicality, to be considered during risk visualization. The second workshop confirmed the value-added through the use of visualizations and the usefulness of risk descriptors. Although this study did not focus on the best way of delivering the most useful data, it contributes to the existing body of knowledge by characterizing risk descriptors and introducing new insights regarding the use of visualization for communicating and describing risks in projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The presented work is part of a research project (Project No. 217M471) funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK). TUBITAK’s support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Abdelgawad, M., and A. R. Fayek. 2011. “Fuzzy reliability analyzer: Quantitative assessment of risk events in the construction industry using fuzzy fault-tree analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (4): 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000285.
Anjum, R. L., and E. Rocca. 2019. “From ideal to real risk: Philosophy of causation meets risk analysis.” Risk Anal. 39 (3): 729–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13187.
Aven, T., O. Renn, and E. A. Rosa. 2011. “On the ontological status of the concept of risk.” Saf. Sci. 49 (8–9): 1074–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.04.015.
Cagno, E., F. Caron, and M. Mancini. 2007. “A multi-dimensional analysis of major risks in complex projects.” Risk Manage. 9 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8250014.
Charoenngam, C., and C. Y. Yeh. 1999. “Contractual risk and liability sharing in hydropower construction.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (1): 29–37.
Cox, L. A. 2008. “What’s wrong with risk matrices?” Risk Anal. 28 (2): 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1539-6924.2008.01030.X.
Dikmen, I., M. T. Birgonul, and G. Atasoy. 2007. “Using cognitive maps for risk modeling in construction projects.” In Proc., CME 25 Conf. Construction Management and Economics, 1461–1470. Reading, UK: Univ. of Reading.
Dikmen, I., C. Budayan, M. Talat Birgonul, and E. Hayat. 2018. “Effects of risk attitude and controllability assumption on risk ratings: Observational study on international construction project risk assessment.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (6): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000643.
Duijm, N. J. 2015. “Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices.” Saf. Sci. 76 (Jul): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2015.02.014.
Edwards, P. J., P. Vaz Serra, and M. Edwards. 2020. Managing project risks. New York: Wiley.
El-Sabek, L. M., and B. Y. McCabe. 2018. “Framework for managing integration challenges of last planner system in IMPs.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (5): 04018022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001468.
Eppler, M. J., and M. Aeschimann. 2009. “A systematic framework for risk visualization in risk management and communication.” Risk Manage. 11 (2): 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2009.4.
Eybpoosh, M., I. Dikmen, and M. T. Birgonul. 2011. “Identification of risk paths in international construction projects using structural equation modeling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (12): 1164–1175. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000382.
Fan, M., N. P. Lin, and C. Sheu. 2008. “Choosing a project risk-handling strategy: An analytical model.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 112 (2): 700–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.06.006.
Fekete, J.-D., J. J. Van-Wijk, J. Stasko, and C. North. 2008. “The value of information visualization.” In Information visualization, edited by A. Kerren, J. T. Stasko, J.-D. Fekete, and C. North, 1–18. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70956-5.
Gershon, N., and S. G. Eick. 1998. “Guest editors’ introduction: Information visualization. The next frontier.” J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 11 (3): 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008680323877.
Goh, C. S., H. Abdul-Rahman, and Z. Abdul Samad. 2013. “Applying risk management workshop for a public construction project: Case study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (5): 572–580. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000599.
Golafshani, N. 2003. “Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research.” Qual. Rep. 8 (4): 597–606. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870.
Hall, J. W., I. C. Cruickshank, and P. S. Godfrey. 2001. “Software-supported risk management for the construction industry.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Civ. Eng. 144 (1): 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1680/cien.2001.144.1.42.
Han, S. H., D. Y. Kim, H. Kim, and W. S. Jang. 2008. “A web-based integrated system for international project risk management.” Autom. Constr. 17 (3): 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.05.012.
Hanna, A. S., G. Thomas, and J. R. Swanson. 2013. “Construction risk identification and allocation: Cooperative approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (9): 1098–1107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000703.
Hubbard, D., and D. Evans. 2010. “Problems with scoring methods and ordinal scales in risk assessment.” IBM J. Res. Dev. 54 (3): 2:1–2:10. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2010.2042914.
ISO. 2003. Quality management systems—Guidelines for quality management in projects. ISO 10006:2003 Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2018. Risk management—Guidelines. ISO 31000. Geneva: ISO.
Jung, W., and S. H. Han. 2017. “Which risk management is most crucial for controlling project cost?” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (5): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000547.
Kang, L. S., S. K. Kim, H. S. Moon, and H. S. Kim. 2013. “Development of a 4D object-based system for visualizing the risk information of construction projects.” Autom. Constr. 31: 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.038.
Kangari, R., and L. S. Riggs. 1989. “Construction risk assessment by linguistics.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 36 (2): 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.18829.
Kelleher, C., and T. Wagener. 2011. “Ten guidelines for effective data visualization in scientific publications.” Environ. Modell. Software 26 (6): 822–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.12.006.
Kerzner, E., S. Goodwin, J. Dykes, S. Jones, and M. Meyer. 2019. “A framework for creative visualization-opportunities workshops.” IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 25 (1): 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865241.
Killen, C. P. 2013. “Evaluation of project interdependency visualizations through decision scenario experimentation.” Int. J. Project Manage. 31 (6): 804–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.005.
Killen, C. P., J. Geraldi, and A. Kock. 2020. “The role of decision makers’ use of visualizations in project portfolio decision making.” Int. J. Project Manage. 38 (5): 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.04.002.
Kimiagari, S., and S. Keivanpour. 2019. “An interactive risk visualisation tool for large-scale and complex engineering and construction projects under uncertainty and interdependence.” Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (21): 6827–6855. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1503426.
Kremljak, Z., and C. Kafol. 2014. “Types of risk in a system engineering environment and software tools for risk analysis.” Procedia Eng. 69: 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.218.
Lam, H., E. Bertini, P. Isenberg, C. Plaisant, and S. Carpendale. 2012. “Empirical studies in information visualization: Seven scenarios.” IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics 18 (9): 1520–1536. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.279.
Lehtiranta, L. 2014. “Risk perceptions and approaches in multi-organizations: A research review 2000-2012.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (4): 640–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.09.002.
Liu, J., X. Zhao, and P. Yan. 2016. “Risk paths in international construction projects: Case study from Chinese contractors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (6): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001116.
Malekitabar, H., A. Ardeshir, M. H. Sebt, R. Stouffs, and E. A. L. Teo. 2018. “On the calculus of risk in construction projects: Contradictory theories and a rationalized approach.” Saf. Sci. 101: 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.014.
Månsson, P. 2019. “Uncommon sense: A review of challenges and opportunities for aggregating disaster risk information.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 40 (Nov): 101149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101149.
Mathison, S. 1988. “Why triangulate?” Educ. Res. 17 (2): 13–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017002013.
Merčun, T. 2014. “Evaluation of information visualization techniques: Analysing user experience with reaction cards." In Proc., 5th Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization, 103–109. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2669557.2669565.
Mokhtari, K., J. Ren, C. Roberts, and J. Wang. 2011. “Application of a generic bow-tie based risk analysis framework on risk management of sea ports and offshore terminals.” J. Hazard. Mater. 192 (2): 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.035.
Muriana, C., and G. Vizzini. 2017. “Project risk management: A deterministic quantitative technique for assessment and mitigation.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (3): 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.010.
Mustafa, M. A., and J. F. Al-Bahar. 1991. “Project risk assessment using the analytic hierarchy process.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 38 (1): 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.65759.
Ni, H., A. Chen, and N. Chen. 2010. “Some extensions on risk matrix approach.” Saf. Sci. 48 (10): 1269–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2010.04.005.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., W. B. Dickinson, N. L. Leech, and A. G. Zoran. 2009. “A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research.” Int. J. Qual. Methods 8 (3): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301.
Peng, W., M. O. Ward, and E. A. Rundensteiner. 2004. “Clutter reduction in multi-dimensional data visualization using dimension reordering.” In Proc., IEEE Symp. on Information Visualization, 89–96. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2004.15.
Perrenoud, A., B. C. Lines, J. Savicky, and K. T. Sullivan. 2017. “Using best-value procurement to measure the impact of initial risk-management capability on qualitative construction performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (5): 04017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000535.
PMI (Project Management Institute). 2013. Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). 5th ed. Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
Qazi, A., and I. Dikmen. 2019. “From risk matrices to risk networks in construction projects.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 68 (5): 1449–1460. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2907787.
Shortridge, J., T. Aven, and S. Guikema. 2017. “Risk assessment under deep uncertainty: A methodological comparison.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 159 (Sep): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.017.
SRA (Society for Risk Analysis). 2015. “Society for Risk Analysis glossary.” Accessed June 30, 2021. https://www.sra.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/SRA-Glossary-FINAL.pdf.
Tah, J. H. M., and V. Carr. 2000. “A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 18 (4): 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190050024905.
Tory, M., and T. Möller. 2005. “Evaluating visualizations: Do expert reviews work?” IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl. 25 (5): 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.102.
Turner, C., W. I. Hamilton, and M. Ramsden. 2017. “Bowtie diagrams: A user-friendly risk communication tool.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 231 (10): 1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409716675006.
van der Hoorn, B. 2020. “Seeing the bigger picture: Conditions that influence effective engagement of project executives with visuals.” Int. J. Project Manage. 38 (2): 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.01.005.
Ward, S., and C. Chapman. 2003. “Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management.” Int. J. Project Manage. 21 (2): 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1.
Ware, C. 2013. Information visualization: Perception for design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Wu, W. S., C. F. Yang, J. C. Chang, P. A. Château, and Y. C. Chang. 2015. “Risk assessment by integrating interpretive structural modeling and Bayesian network, case of offshore pipeline project.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 142: 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.06.013.
Xia, N., X. Wang, Y. Wang, Q. Yang, and X. Liu. 2017. “Lifecycle cost risk analysis for infrastructure projects with modified Bayesian networks.” J. Eng. Des. Technol. 15 (1): 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-05-2015-0033.
Zhao, X., B. G. Hwang, S. Pheng Low, and P. Wu. 2015. “Reducing hindrances to enterprise risk management implementation in construction firms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (3): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000945.
Zhu, B., and H. Chen. 2008. “Information visualization for decision support.” In Handbook on decision support systems 2. 1st ed., edited by F. Burstein and C. W. Holsapple, 699–722. New York: Springer.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148Issue 5May 2022

History

Received: Jul 8, 2021
Accepted: Jan 9, 2022
Published online: Mar 10, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 10, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Universiteler Mahallesi, Dumlupinar Bulvari No. 1, Cankaya, Ankara 06800, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0512-9279. Email: [email protected]
Ugurcan Ertaymaz [email protected]
Master’s Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Universiteler Mahallesi, Dumlupinar Bulvari No. 1, Cankaya, Ankara 06800, Turkey. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Universiteler Mahallesi, Dumlupinar Bulvari No. 1, Cankaya, Ankara 06800, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6988-7557. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Universiteler Mahallesi, Dumlupinar Bulvari No. 1, Cankaya, Ankara 06800, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1638-2926. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A Synthesis of Literature on the Effects of COVID-19 on Construction Industry, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1466, 29, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share