Some features of the ASCE Shopping cart and login features of the website will be down for maintenance on Sunday, June 16th, 2024, beginning at 12:00 A.M. ET and ending at 6:00 A.M. ET. During this time if you need immediate assistance at 1-800-548-2723 or [email protected].

Scholarly Papers
Apr 13, 2023

Determining Highway Project Contract Time from Project Duration Estimates

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 3

Abstract

Contract time determination (CTD) by state DOTs is critical to a typical design-bid-build project due to its profound impacts on stakeholders in various aspects, such as the actual amount of time allocated to the contractor, contracting parties’ costs, and motorists’ traveling experiences on roads constructed under traffic. Reviewing DOTs’ CTD manuals and guidance shows that determining contract time is more complex than only estimating a reliable project duration from technical inputs such as work quantities, which has been the focus of previous studies. The type of contract time (e.g., working days or calendar days) affects contractors’ schedule risks, and external factors such as political commitments often affect highway projects significantly. However, those issues were rarely considered in past studies. Furthermore, a systematic procedure for determining contract time from a project duration estimate and effective supporting tools are lacking in DOTs’ current practice. This study proposed such a procedure incorporating typical constraints of highway projects identified by reviewing CTD-related documents and conducting seven face-to-face interviews with CTD experts. Other contributions include designing an accompanied computation algorithm to automate the process and developing a freely available Microsoft Excel tool to help DOT practitioners implement the proposed procedure in their operations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated and analyzed during this research are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program 08-114: Systematic Approach for Construction Contract Time Determination. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the US agency.

References

Works Cited

Abdel-Raheem, M., and J. Reyes. 2020. “Investigation of the contract time determination systems used for highway projects in the USA.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (10): 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120939098.
ADOT (Arizona DOT). 2015. “Estimating contract time.” Chap. 6 in ADOT Policies and Procedures. Phoenix: ADOT.
Amer, F., H. Y. Koh, and M. Golparvar-Fard. 2021. “Automated methods and systems for construction planning and scheduling: Critical review of three decades of research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (7): 03121002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002093.
Caltrans. 2001. Memorandum—Construction contract time. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans.
CDOT (Colorado DOT). 2019. Construction manual—Section 100: General provisions. Denver: CDOT.
DelDOT (Delaware DOT). 2011. Preconstruction timing analysis requirements. Dover, DE: DelDOT.
Elrahman, O. 2008. Night-time road construction operations synthesis of practice. Albany, NY: New York State DOT.
FDOT (Florida DOT). 2020. Construction project administration manual. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.
Hanna, A. S., and K. A. Iskandar. 2018. “Factors affecting construction labor productivity: Qualitative and quantitative assessment.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018, 597–607. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hanna, A. S., C. S. Taylor, and K. T. Sullivan. 2005. “Impact of extended overtime on construction labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (6): 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(734).
Hawaii DOT. 2007. Project development manual. Honolulu: Hawaii DOT.
IDOT (Illinois DOT). 2017. “Contract processing, Bureau of design and environment manual.” Chap. 66 in Bureau of Design and Environmental Manual. Springfield, IL: IDOT.
Iowa DOT. 2020. Letting guidelines—Section 11: Contract periods/innovative contracting. Ames, IA: Office of Contracts, Iowa DOT.
Irfan, M., M. B. Khurshid, P. Anastasopoulos, S. Labi, and F. Moavenzadeh. 2011. “Planning-stage estimation of highway project duration on the basis of anticipated project cost, project type, and contract type.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (1): 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.001.
ITD (Idaho Transportation Department). 2011. Contract time determination in project development. Boise, ID: ITD.
Le, C., H. D. Jeong, and I. Damnjanovic. 2021a. “Network theory–driven construction logic knowledge network: Process modeling and application in highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (10): 04021114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002143.
Le, C., K. J. Shrestha, H. D. Jeong, and I. Damnjanovic. 2021b. “A sequential pattern mining driven framework for developing construction logic knowledge bases.” Autom. Constr. 121 (Jan): 103439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103439.
Le, C., M. W. Yaw, H. D. Jeong, and K. Choi. 2021c. “Comprehensive evaluation of influential factors on public roadway project contract time.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (5): 04021044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000932.
MassDOT (Massachusetts DOT). 2014. Construction contract time determination guidelines for designers/planners. Boston: MassDOT.
MDT (Montana DOT). 2021. Contract time determination procedures. Helena, MT: MDT.
MnDOT (Minnesota DOT). 2005. Determination of contract time. St Paul, MN: MnDOT.
MoDOT (Missouri DOT). 2004. Contract time determination. Jefferson City, MO: MoDOT.
NJDOT (New Jersey DOT). 2013. Construction scheduling manual. Ewing Township: NJDOT.
Ohio DOT. 2013. Construction duration estimation tool. Columbus, OH: Ohio DOT.
Ohio DOT. 2018. Project development process (PDP). Columbus, OH: Ohio DOT.
Qiao, Y., S. Labi, and J. D. Fricker. 2019. “Hazard-based duration models for predicting actual duration of highway projects using nonparametric and parametric survival analysis.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (6): 04019024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000700.
Salem, O., B. Basu, R. Miller, J. Randall, J. Swanson, and R. Engel. 2006. “Accelerating the construction of a highway bridge in Ohio.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 11 (2): 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2006)11:2(98).
Stephenson, L., E. Douglas, D. Hanks, J. Hollmann, A. Jagathnarayanan, M. Nosbich, K. Uppal, P. White, and D. Wolfson. 2010. Schedule classification system. Morgantown, WV: AACE International.
Taylor, T. R. B., R. E. Sturgill, and Y. Li. 2017. Practices for establishing contract completion dates for highway projects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Transportation Research Board. 2022a. Developing a systematic approach for determining construction contract time. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Transportation Research Board. 2022b. Systematic approach for determining construction contract time: A guidebook. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
TxDOT (Texas DOT). 2018. Contract time determination guidance. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
WSDOT (Washington State DOT). 2013. “Appendix 6: Determination of contract time—Plans preparation manual.” In WSDOT Plans Preparation Manual. Olympia, WA: WSDOT.
WVDOT (West Virginia DOT). 2013. Design directive 803: Determination of contract completion date. Charleston, WV: WVDOT.
Zhai, D., Y. Shan, R. E. Sturgill, T. R. B. Taylor, and P. M. Goodrum. 2016. “Using parametric modeling to estimate highway construction contract time.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2573 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2573-01.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15Issue 3August 2023

History

Received: Oct 5, 2022
Accepted: Feb 8, 2023
Published online: Apr 13, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 13, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58102 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2582-2671. Email: [email protected]
H. David Jeong, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
James C. Smith Construction Industry Advisory Council (CIAC) Endowed Professor, Dept. of Construction Science, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share