Barriers and Enablers to Circular Building Design in the US: An Empirical Study
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 10
Abstract
As discussions around the circular economy (CE) start to move beyond Eurocentric approaches, US stakeholders are left with the mission of carving their way into CE. The US building sector has substantial impacts in resource use, waste generation, and carbon emissions, and a long way to go on the path toward CE. Circular building design involves strategies such as design for disassembly (DfD) to allow future repair, remanufacture, and reuse of building components, building adaptive reuse, and using salvaged materials in new construction. Although strategies like DfD have been discussed for the last 2 decades, they have failed to gain traction in building design. However, there is a limited body of literature devoted to understanding the barriers and enablers for key circular building design strategies like DfD. A few recent empirical studies in European countries have identified barriers for circular building design, which in this study were categorized according to their nature (regulatory, economic, technical, educational, cultural, technological, and environmental barriers). However, given the different regulatory, economic, and cultural contexts in which the US is situated when compared with European countries, the barriers identified in prior studies and their respective enablers may not apply to the US. For example, contrary to European countries, the US is yet to create a national CE-specific legislation or action plan. Thus, bottom-up efforts from industry stakeholders are key to achieve progress toward CE in the US. Yet there are no studies that investigated barriers and enablers to circular building design in the US context. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap. The authors interviewed architects across the US to understand the perceived and experienced barriers to circular building design in the US building sector and propose enablers to overcome these barriers. The barriers differed in nature from those found in European countries: although the share of technical and economic barriers were similar, more educational and cultural barriers were found in the US, as opposed to a larger shares of regulatory and technological barriers in European countries. The authors discuss the most mentioned barriers in the US (e.g., cost and schedule constraints, lack of clarity on what CE entails, and existing regulations and codes hinder reuse and repair), and the barriers that were new to the literature (e.g., belief that DfD compromises building durability and resiliency, conflicting goals between pre-engineered structures and future reuse, and the widespread use of nondurable building components). Finally, the authors propose enablers to address each barrier and discuss the role of different stakeholders in implementing enablers. Policymakers, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), industry associations, and researchers were the stakeholders with the highest leverage to enable CE in the US building sector.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions. As per IRB requirements, identifying information about the interviewees are confidential.
Acknowledgments
This study was partially supported by the International Cooperation Program CAPES/Laspau, financed by CAPES—Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education. Part of this work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. GCR-1934824. The authors also want to thank the architects that participated in this research effort.
References
Adams, K. T., M. Osmani, T. Thorpe, and J. Thornback. 2017. “Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Waste Resour. Manage. 170. (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.16.00011.
Akinade, O., L. Oyedele, A. Oyedele, J. M. Davila Delgado, M. Bilal, L. Akanbi, A. Ajayi, and H. Owolabi. 2020. “Design for deconstruction using a circular economy approach: Barriers and strategies for improvement.” Prod. Plann. Control 31 (10): 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1695006.
Akinade, O. O., L. O. Oyedele, K. Omoteso, S. O. Ajayi, M. Bilal, H. A. Owolabi, H. A. Alaka, L. Ayris, and J. Henry Looney. 2017. “BIM-based deconstruction tool: Towards essential functionalities.” Int. J. Sustainable Built Environ. 6 (1): 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.01.002.
Althaf, S., and C. W. Babbitt. 2020. “Disruption risks to material supply chains in the electronics sector.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 167 (Apr): 105248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105248.
Bilec, M. M., E. J. Beckman, J. Jambeck, J. Locklin, G. Jiang, F. Cruz, and R. Ford. 2020. NSF convergence accelerator: Design for circular economy from molecules to the built environment workshop report. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh.
Blomsma, F., and M. Tennant. 2020. “Circular economy: Preserving materials or products? Introducing the resource states framework.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 156 (Nov): 104698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104698.
BNP Media. 2018. “2014 top 300 architecture firms.” Accessed August 8, 2017. https://www.architecturalrecord.com/Top300/2014-Top-300-Architecture-Firms-1.
Bocken, N. M. P., I. de Pauw, C. Bakker, and B. van der Grinten. 2016. “Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy.” J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 33 (5): 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124.
Bocken, N. M. P., E. A. Olivetti, J. M. Cullen, J. Potting, and R. Lifset. 2017. “Taking the circularity to the next level: A special issue on the circular economy.” J. Ind. Ecol. 21 (3): 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12606.
Braungart, M. 2020. “C2C design concept.” Accessed April 26, 2021. http://braungart.epea-hamburg.org/en/content/c2c-design-concept.
Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Circle Economy. 2019. “The circularity gap report 2019.” Accessed April 26, 2021. https://bfc732f7-80e9-4ba1-b429-7f76cf51627b.filesusr.com/ugd/ad6e59_ba1e4d16c64f44fa94fbd8708eae8e34.pdf.
Circle Economy. 2020a. “Making sense of the circular economy: The 7 key elements.” Accessed April 26, 2021. http://www.circle-economy.com/the-7-key-elements-of-the-circular-economy.
Circle Economy. 2020b. “The circularity gap report 2020.” Accessed April 26, 2021. https://assets.website-files.com/5e185aa4d27bcf348400ed82/5e26ead616b6d1d157ff4293_20200120%20-%20CGR%20Global%20-%20Report%20web%20single%20page%20-%20210x297mm%20-%20compressed.pdf.
Copeland, S., and M. Bilec. 2020. “Building as material banks using RFID and building information modeling in a circular economy.” Procedia CIRP 90 (Jan): 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.122.
Crowther, P. 1999. “Design for disassembly: An architectural strategy.” In Environmental design guide, edited by M. Ganis, 27–33. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: Queensland Univ. of Technology.
Crowther, P. 2005. “Design for disassembly—Themes and principles.” In Environment design guide. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute of Architects.
Cruz Rios, F., W. K. Chong, and D. Grau. 2015. “Design for disassembly and deconstruction-challenges and opportunities.” Procedia Eng. 118: 1296–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.485.
Cruz Rios, F., and D. Grau. 2020. “Circular economy in the built environment: Designing, deconstructing, and leasing reusable products.” Encycl. Renewable Sustainable Mater. 5: 338–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.11494-8.
CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australian Government). 2020. “A circular economy roadmap for plastics, tyres, glass and paper in Australia.” Accessed April 26, 2021. https://www.csiro.au/en/Research/Environment/Circular-Economy/Circular-Economy-individual-products.
den Hollander, M. C., C. A. Bakker, and E. J. Hultink. 2017. “Product design in a circular economy: Development of a typology of key concepts and terms.” J. Ind. Ecol. 21 (3): 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12610.
Densley Tingley, D., S. Cooper, and J. Cullen. 2017. “Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective.” J. Cleaner Prod. 148 (Apr): 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.006.
Durmisevic, E. 2019. “Circular economy in construction design strategies for reversible buildings. Buildings as material banks.” Accessed April 26, 2021. https://www.bamb2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Reversible-Building-Design-Strateges.pdf.
EMF (Ellen MacArthur Foundation). 2013. “Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an acceleated transition.” Accessed April 26, 2021. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf.
EMF (Ellen MacArthur Foundation). 2019. “Completing the picture: How the circular economy tackles climate change.” Accessed April 26, 2021. www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications.
EMF (Ellen MacArthur Foundation). 2020. “Circular design.” Accessed April 26, 2021. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/explore/circular-design.
Gaustad, G., E. Williams, and A. Leader. 2020. “Rare earth metals from secondary sources: Review of potential supply from waste and byproducts.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 167: 105213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105213.
Geissdoerfer, M., P. Savaget, N. M. P. Bocken, and E. J. Hultink. 2017. “Review: The circular economy—A new sustainability paradigm?” J. Cleaner Prod. 143 (Jan): 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
Guy, B., and N. Ciarimboli. 2007. Design for disassembly in the built environment: A guide to closed-loop design and building. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State Univ.
Hart, J., K. Adams, J. Giesekam, D. Tingley, and F. Pomponi. 2019. “Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: The case of the built environment.” In Proc., 26th CIRP Life Cycle Engineering Conf., 619–624. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Hayes, D. 2017. Life in a living building. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State Univ.
Heinrich, M., and W. Lang. 2019. Materials passports—Best practice: Innovative solutions for a transition to a circular economy in the built environment. München, Germany: Technische Universität München.
Hossain, M. U., S. T. Ng, P. Antwi-Afari, and B. Amor. 2020. “Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 130 (June): 109948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109948.
Kanters, J. 2020. “Circular building design: An analysis of barriers and drivers for a circular building sector.” Buildings 10 (4): 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10040077.
Kibert, C. J. 2013. Vol. 1 of Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Kirchherr, J., L. Piscicelli, R. Bour, E. Kostense-Smit, J. Muller, A. Huibrechtse-Truijens, and M. Hekkert. 2018. “Barriers to the circular economy: Evidence from the European Union (EU).” Ecol. Econ. 150 (Aug): 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028.
Korhonen, J., C. Nuur, A. Feldmann, and S. E. Birkie. 2018. “Circular economy as an essentially contested concept.” J. Cleaner Prod. 175 (Feb): 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111.
Kozminska, U. 2019. “Circular design: Reused materials and the future reuse of building elements in architecture. Process, challenges and case studies.” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 225 (1): 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012033.
Luscuere, L., and D. Mulhall. 2018. “Circularity information management for buildings: The example of material passports.” In Designing for the circular economy, edited by M. Chapter, 1st ed., 369–380. London: Routledge.
Mahpour, A. 2018. “Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 134 (Dec): 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.026.
McDowall, W., Y. Geng, B. Huang, E. Barteková, R. Bleischwitz, S. Türkeli, R. Kemp, and T. Doménech. 2017. “Circular economy policies in China and Europe.” J. Ind. Ecol. 21 (3): 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12597.
McGlyn, J. 2015. “5 megatrends that will unleash value in the circular economy.” Accessed April 26, 2021. https://www.greenbiz.com/article/5-megatrends-will-unleash-value-circular-economy.
Ness, D., J. Swift, D. C. Ranasinghe, K. Xing, and V. Soebarto. 2015. “Smart steel: New paradigms for the reuse of steel enabled by digital tracking and modelling.” J. Cleaner Prod. 98 (Jul): 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.055.
Pacheco-Torgal, F. 2014. “1—Introduction to the environmental impact of construction and building materials.” In Eco-efficient construction and building materials. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097729.1.
Pomponi, F., and A. Moncaster. 2017. “Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework.” J. Cleaner Prod. 143 (Feb): 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055.
Rakhshan, K., J. C. Morel, H. Alaka, and R. Charef. 2020. “Components reuse in the building sector—A systematic review.” Waste Manage. Res. 38 (4): 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20910463.
Rios, F. C., W. K. Chong, and D. Grau. 2015. “Design for disassembly and deconstruction-challenges and opportunities.” Procedia Eng. 118 (Jan): 1296–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.485.
Saidani, M., B. Yannou, Y. Leroy, F. Cluzel, and A. Kendall. 2019. “A taxonomy of circular economy indicators.” J. Cleaner Prod. 207 (Jan): 542–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.014.
Stahel, W. R. 2016. “The circular economy.” Nature 531 (7595): 435. https://doi.org/10.1038/531435a.
Stahel, W. R. 2019. Circular economy: A user’s guide. London: Routledge.
Stephan, A., and A. Athanassiadis. 2017. “Quantifying and mapping embodied environmental requirements of urban building stocks.” Build. Environ. 114 (Mar): 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.043.
Wijkman, A., and K. Skånberg. 2015. “The circular economy and benefits to society.” Accessed April 26, 2021. https://www.clubofrome.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/The-Circular-Economy-and-Benefits-for-Society.pdf.
Zhu, X. 2014. “GIS and urban mining.” Resources 3 (1): 235–247. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3010235.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 23, 2020
Accepted: Mar 5, 2021
Published online: Jul 23, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 23, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Radwa Eissa, Islam H. El-adaway, Accelerating the Circular Economy Transition: A Construction Value Chain-Structured Portfolio of Strategies and Implementation Insights, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14550, 150, 8, (2024).
- Marco D’Orazio, Gabriele Bernardini, Elisa Di Giuseppe, Improving Sustainable Management of University Buildings Based on Occupancy Data, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13563, 150, 1, (2024).
- Radwa Eissa, Islam H. El-adaway, Circular Economy Strategies for Decarbonization of the Built Environment Value Chain Scope 3 Emissions: A Network Analysis, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485279.002, (10-20), (2024).
- Guilherme Monteiro Eliote, Fernanda Leite, Towards Circular Economy in the Built Environment: Overcoming Obsolescence Via Building Adaptation, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.4352965, (2023).
- Tianxin Li, Zhongfu Li, Jin Cai, Antecedents and consequence of intra-organizational diffusion of prefabricated construction technology: a contingency theory perspective, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10.1108/ECAM-07-2022-0615, (2023).
- Kerim Koc, Handan Kunkcu, Asli Pelin Gurgun, A Life Cycle Risk Management Framework for Green Building Project Stakeholders, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5361, 39, 4, (2023).
- Will Hill, Hiba Jalloul, Mohammad Movahedi, Juyeong Choi, Sustainable Management of the Built Environment from the Life Cycle Perspective, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-4759, 39, 2, (2023).
- Purva Mhatre, Vidyadhar V. Gedam, Seema Unnikrishnan, Rakesh D. Raut, Circular economy adoption barriers in built environment- a case of emerging economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136201, 392, (136201), (2023).
- Bas Wouterszoon Jansen, Anne van Stijn, Vincent Gruis, Gerard van Bortel, Cooking Up a Circular Kitchen: A Longitudinal Study of Stakeholder Choices in the Development of a Circular Building Component, Sustainability, 10.3390/su142315761, 14, 23, (15761), (2022).
- Don Fullerton, Callie W. Babbitt, Melissa M. Bilec, Shan He, Cindy Isenhour, Vikas Khanna, Eunsang Lee, Thomas L. Theis, Introducing the Circular Economy to Economists, Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10.1146/annurev-resource-101321-053659, 14, 1, (493-514), (2022).
- See more