Technical Papers
Apr 9, 2021

Outcome of Financial Conflicts in the Operation Phase of Public–Private Partnership Contracts

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 6

Abstract

Deviation from expected revenues is a common occurrence in the operational phase of public–private partnership (PPP) contracts. In these cases, the financial dispute must be resolved by key stakeholders such as the government, private investors, and end users; otherwise, the project will terminate early. Despite numerous reports of financial disputes, the literature lacks a comprehensive model for analyzing stakeholder strategies and examining the outcomes of PPP projects. In order to fill this research gap, this paper uses a three-player non-zero-sum game to extract the potential results of interactions among them. Then, using the concepts of game theory, the expected payoff players are calculated in the best individual strategy and cooperation terms, and the optimal outcomes are presented. The proposed model, on the one hand, examines the impacts of early termination, including the compensation mechanism of the government, the investment value of the private investor, and alternative services for users. On the other hand, it measures the expected payoff of players from participation in the project rescue. Applying this model can support strategic renegotiations and provide a fair and optimal structure to readjust contract variables (concession period, tolls, and government subsidy), which will facilitate and expedite the decision-making process in resolving financial conflicts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Ashuri, B., H. Kashani, K. R. Molenaar, S. Lee, and J. Lu. 2011. “Risk-neutral pricing approach for evaluating BOT highway projects with government minimum revenue guarantee options.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (4): 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000447.
Barron, E. N. 2013. Game theory: An introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Ben Jazia, A. 2017. “Flexible public private partnerships: A real-option-based optimization approach.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Economics and Management, Institute of Business Administration, Aix-Marseille Univ.
Chen, A., and K. Subprasom. 2007. “Analysis of regulation and policy of private toll roads in a build-operate-transfer scheme under demand uncertainty.” Transp. Res. Part A 41 (6): 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.11.009.
Chen, T. C., Y. C. Lin, and L. C. Wang. 2012. “The analysis of BOT strategies based on game theory–case study on Taiwan’s high speed railway project.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 18 (5): 662–674. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.723329.
Cruz, C. O., and R. C. Marques. 2013. “Flexible contracts to cope with uncertainty in public–private partnerships.” Int. J. Proj. Manage. 31 (3): 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.006.
Domingues, S., and D. Zlatkovic. 2015. “Renegotiating PPP contracts: Reinforcing the ‘P’ in partnership.” Transp. Rev. 35 (2): 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.992495.
Feng, Z., Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, and J. Song. 2018. “Contracting and renegotiating with a loss-averse private firm in BOT road projects.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 112 (Jun): 40–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.04.004.
Guasch, J. L., D. Benitez, I. Portables, and L. Flor. 2014. “The renegotiation of PPP contracts: An overview of its recent evolution in Latin America.” In Proc., Int. Transport Forum Discussion Paper No. 2014-18. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Guasch, J. L., J. J. Laffont, and S. Straub. 2008. “Renegotiation of concession contracts in Latin America: Evidence from the water and transport sectors.” Int. J. Ind. Organ. 26 (2): 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.05.003.
Ho, S. P. 2006. “Model for financial renegotiation in public-private partnership projects and its policy implications: Game theoretic view.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (7): 678–688. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:7(678).
Ho, S. P., R. Levitt, C. W. Tsui, and Y. Hsu. 2015. “Opportunism-focused transaction cost analysis of public-private partnerships.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (6): 04015007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000361.
Jang, W., G. Yu, W. Jung, D. Kim, and S. H. Han. 2017. “Financial conflict resolution for public-private partnership projects using a three-phase game framework.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (3): 05017022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001442.
Neto, D. D. C., E. S. Cruz, and J. M. Sarmento. 2017. “Understanding the patterns of PPP renegotiations for infrastructure projects in Latin America: The case of Brazil.” Competition Regul. Network Ind. 18 (3–4): 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591718790712.
Nicolaisen, M. S., and P. A. Driscoll. 2014. “Ex-post evaluations of demand forecast accuracy: A literature review.” Transp. Rev. 34 (4): 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.926428.
Nikolaidis, N., and A. Roumboutsos. 2013. “A PPP renegotiation framework: A road concession in Greece.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 3 (2): 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-05-2012-0031.
Peters, H. 2015. Game theory: A multi-leveled approach. Berlin: Springer.
Shapley, L. S. 1953. “Stochastic games.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 39 (10): 1095–1100. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.39.10.1095.
Sharafi, A., H. Iranmanesh, M. S. Amalnick, and M. Abdollahzade. 2016. “Financial management of public private partnership projects using artificial intelligence and fuzzy model.” Int. J. Energy Stat. 4 (2): 1650007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2335680416500071.
Sharafi, A., A. A. Taleizadeh, and M. S. Amalnick. 2018. “Fair allocation in financial disputes between public–private partnership stakeholders using game theory.” Serv. Sci. 10 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2017.0179.
Shen, L. Y., H. J. Bao, H. J. Wu, and W. S. Lu. 2007. “Using bargaining-game theory for negotiating concession period for BOT-type contract.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (5): 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:5(385).
Shen, L. Y., H. Li, and Q. M. Li. 2002. “Alternative concession model for build operate transfer contract projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 128 (4): 326–330. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:4(326).
Song, J., Y. Hu, and Z. Feng. 2017. “Factors influencing early termination of PPP projects in China.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (1): 05017008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000572.
Song, J., Y. Yu, L. Jin, and Z. Feng. 2018. “Early termination compensation under demand uncertainty in public-private partnership projects.” Int. J. Strategic Property Manage. 22 (6): 532–543. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2018.6049.
Song, J. B., Y. A. Fu, and O. Bagaya. 2016. “Compensation mechanism for early termination of highway BOT projects based on ARIMA model.” Int. J. Archit. Eng. Constr. 5 (1): 53–60. https://doi.org/10.7492/IJAEC.2016.006.
Tan, Z., and H. Yang. 2012. “Flexible build-operate-transfer contracts for road franchising under demand uncertainty.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 46 (10): 1419–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.07.001.
Woo, C. K., Y. S. Cheng, R. Li, A. Shiu, S. T. Ho, and I. Horowitz. 2015. “Can Hong Kong price-manage its cross-harbor-tunnel congestion?” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 82 (Dec): 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.09.002.
World Bank. 2017. Public private partnership: Reference guide. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Xie, J., and S. Thomas Ng. 2013. “Multi objective Bayesian network model for public-private partnership decision support.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (9): 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000695.
Xing, W., and F. F. Wu. 2001. “A game-theoretic model of private power production.” Electr. Power Energy Syst. 23 (Jul): 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-0615(00)00059-4.
Xiong, W., and X. Zhang. 2014a. “Compensation approaches for early termination of PPP projects.” In Proc., 17th Int. Symp. on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, 721–729. Berlin: Springer.
Xiong, W., and X. Zhang. 2014b. “Concession renegotiation models for projects developed through public-private partnerships.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (5): 04014008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000843.
Xiong, W., and X. Zhang. 2016. “The real option value of renegotiation in public–private partnerships.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (8): 04016021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001130.
Xiong, W., X. Zhao, and H. Wang. 2018. “Information asymmetry in renegotiation of public–private partnership projects.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 32 (4): 04018028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000763.
Zhang, X. Q., and W. Xiong. 2015. “Renegotiation and early-termination in public private partnership.” Int. J. Archit. Eng. Constr. 4 (4): 204–213. https://doi.org/10.7492/IJAEC.2015.021.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 6June 2021

History

Received: Jan 4, 2020
Accepted: Oct 22, 2020
Published online: Apr 9, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 9, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Tehran, Tehran 1439955961, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9365-6927. Email: [email protected]
Mohsen Sadegh Amalnick [email protected]
Full Professor, School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Tehran, Tehran 1439955961, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Ata Allah Taleizadeh [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Tehran, Tehran 1439955961, Iran. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share