Stakeholder Engagement in Construction: Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethical Behaviors, and Practices
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146, Issue 3
Abstract
Stakeholder engagement is an undertheorized area of construction project management research. Often simplified as an act of corporate social responsibility, the complexity of the engagement concept means its processes and consequences evade closer scrutiny and analysis. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of stakeholder engagement to reveal its theoretical and practical complexity; two complimentary models of stakeholder engagement are mobilized to analyze empirical data from a hospital case-study project. The result is a retheorization of stakeholder engagement as a complex entwined process of responsibility, organizational action, and work package requirements where stakeholder engagement and agency (i.e., ethical treatment of stakeholders) are understood as separate variables that result in shifts among responsible, paternalistic, neoclassic, and strategic behaviors. The contribution lies in a more sophisticated understanding of stakeholder engagement being attained: shifts between stakeholder engagement and agency define relations between parties in corporate social responsibility (CSR) terms; the ethical aspirations of architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) organizations are impacted by daily project activities; and the unique characteristics of stakeholder engagement in construction (e.g., binding of party interests, effect of subcontractor entry, and collective blame/praise) are brought into focus. Resulting recommendations include periodic review of engagement activity to ensure the CSR strategic objectives of organizations are aligned to stakeholder engagement work.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and editor for their important comments and thoughts on earlier drafts of this paper.
References
APM (Association for Project Management). 2012. Body of knowledge. 6th ed. Princes Risborough, UK: APM.
Atkin, B., and M. Skitmore. 2008. “Editorial: Stakeholder management in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 26 (6): 549–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802142405.
Bowen, F., A. Newenham-Kahindi, and I. Herremans. 2010. “When suits meet roots: The antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy.” J. Bus. Ethics 95 (2): 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0360-1.
Chinyio, E., and P. Olomolaiye. 2010. Construction stakeholder management. New York: Wiley.
Chinyio, E. A., and A. Akintoye. 2008. “Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: Findings from the UK.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 26 (6): 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802078310.
Collinge, W. H., and C. F. Harty. 2014. “Stakeholder interpretations of design: Semiotic insights into the briefing process.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 32 (7–8): 760–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.894247.
Deegan, C. 2002. “The legitimising effects of social and environmental disclosures—A theoretical foundation.” Account. Auditing Account. J. 15 (3): 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852.
Fraser, C., and C. Zhu. 2008. “Stakeholder perception of construction site managers’ effectiveness.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 26 (6): 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802036151.
Freeman, R. E. 1999. “Divergent stakeholder theory.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 24 (2): 233–236. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893932.
Friedman, A. L., and S. Miles. 2002. “Developing stakeholder theory.” J. Manage. Stud. 39 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00280.
Ghaffarianhoseini, A., J. Tookey, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, N. Naismith, S. Azhar, O. Efimova, and K. Raahemifar. 2017. “Building information modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 75 (Aug): 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.083.
Greenwood, M. 2007. “Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility.” J. Bus. Ethics 74 (4): 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y.
He, Q., G. Wang, L. Luo, Q. Shi, J. Xie, and X. Meng. 2017. “Mapping the managerial areas of building information modeling (BIM) using scientometric analysis.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (4): 670–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.001.
Johnston, K. A. 2010. “Community engagement: Exploring a relational approach to consultation and collaborative practice in Australia.” J. Promot. Manage. 16 (1–2): 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496490903578550.
Kaler, J. 2002. “Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification.” J. Bus. Ethics 39 (1): 919–999. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016336118528.
Lane, A. B., and B. Devin. 2018. “Operationalizing stakeholder engagement in CSR: A process approach.” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manage. 25 (3): 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1460.
Leung, M., J. Yu, and Q. Liang. 2013. “Improving public engagement in construction development projects from a stakeholder’s perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (11): 04013019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000754.
Mathur, V. N., A. D. F. Price, and S. Austin. 2008. “Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 26 (6): 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802061233.
Missonier, S., and S. Loufrani-Fedida. 2014. “Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: From stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (7): 1108–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.02.010.
Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. “Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 22 (4): 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105.
Newcombe, R. 2003. “From client to project stakeholders: A stakeholder mapping approach.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 21 (8): 841–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000072137.
Noland, J., and R. Phillips. 2010. “Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management.” Int. J. Manage. Rev. 12 (1): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00279.x.
Olander, S., and A. Landin. 2008. “A comparative study of factors affecting the external stakeholder management process.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 26 (6): 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701821810.
Owen, D. L., T. A. Swift, C. Humphrey, and M. Bowerman. 2000. “The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions?” Eur. Account. Rev. 9 (1): 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/096381800407950.
Pärn, E. A., D. J. Edwards, and M. C. P. Sing. 2017. “The building information modelling trajectory in facilities management: A review.” Autom. Constr. 75 (Mar): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.12.003.
Phillips, R. 1999. “On stakeholder delimitation.” Bus. Soc. 38 (1): 32–34.
Prasad, S. 2008. Changing hospital architecture. London: RIBA Publishing.
RIBA (Royal Institute of British Architects). 2013. Plan of work (PoW). London: RIBA.
Rowan, J. R. 2000. “The moral foundation of employee rights.” J. Bus. Ethics 24 (4): 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006286315756.
Smyth, H. 2008. “The credibility gap in stakeholder management: Ethics and evidence of relationship management.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 26 (6): 633–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190801905414.
Treviño, L. K., and G. R. Weaver. 1999. “The stakeholder research tradition: Converging theorists—Not convergent theory.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 24 (2): 222–227. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893930.
Turner, J. R. 2009. The handbook of project based management. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Volk, R., J. Stengel, and F. Schultmann. 2014. “Building information modeling (BIM) for existing buildings—Literature review and future needs.” Autom. Constr. 38 (Mar): 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.023.
Walker, D. H. T., L. M. Bourne, and A. Shelley. 2008. “Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 26 (6): 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701882390.
Wicks, A. C., S. L. Berman, and T. M. Jones. 1999. “The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 24 (1): 99–116. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580443.
Yang, J., G. Q. Shen, L. Bourne, C. M. F. Ho, and X. Xue. 2011a. “A typology of operational approaches for stakeholder analysis and engagement.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 29 (2): 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.521759.
Yang, J., G. Q. Shen, M. Ho, D. S. Drew, and X. Xue. 2011b. “Stakeholder management in construction: An empirical study to address research gaps in previous studies.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (7): 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.013.
Yu, J., and M.-Y. Leung. 2018. “Structural stakeholder model in public engagement for construction development projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (6): 04018046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001462.
Zou, Y., A. Kiviniemi, and S. W. Jones. 2017. “A review of risk management through BIM and BIM-related technologies.” Saf. Sci. 97 (Aug): 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.027.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146 • Issue 3 • March 2020
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 5, 2019
Accepted: Jul 19, 2019
Published online: Jan 6, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 6, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.