A Difference in Perspective: Impact of Different Formats of Engineering Information and Spatial Cognition on Craft-Worker Eye-Gaze Patterns
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145, Issue 11
Abstract
Individuals vary widely in their ability to translate complex spatial information into performing physical tasks. Much of the variability can be explained by their experience in using different information formats and differences in individual spatial cognition. Traditional delivery of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) designs rely on two-dimensional isometric drawings. Advancements in three-dimensional (3D) computer-aided design (CAD), augmented reality, virtual reality, and 3D printing have provided new format options for delivering engineering information; however, providing them to crafts for use at the construction workface remains relatively rare. The objective of this research is to understand how eye-gaze patterns of construction craft workers is influenced by information formats and spatial cognition when building a complex spatial task. A series of field trials with MEP workers was conducted to examine the influence of information format and spatial cognition on their eye-gaze patterns in building a scale-model pipe assembly. Participants were provided eye-tracking glasses along with one of three information formats: two-dimensional (2D) isometric drawings, 2D isometric drawings supplemented with a 3D image of the assembly, and 2D isometric drawings supplemented with a 3D physical model of the assembly. Card rotation and cube comparison tests were administered to measure spatial cognition. The results of this paper reveal that the information format and spatial cognition significantly influenced workers’ eye-gaze patterns; there are different gaze patterns for different information formats, and these differences in gaze patterns were associated with differences in spatial cognition abilities. Additionally, the improvement in performance when using different engineering information formats is associated with different eye-gaze patterns.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
References
Baldwin, C. 2009. “Individual differences in navigational strategy: Implications for display design.” Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 10 (5): 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220903106379.
Bhoir, S., S. Hasanzadeh, B. Esmaeili, M. D. Dodd, and M. S. Fardhosseini. 2014. “Measuring construction workers’ attention using eye tracking technology.” In Proc., Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 5th Int./11th Construction Specialty Conf., 1–6. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Univ. of British Columbia.
Bowden, S., A. Dorr, A. Thorpe, and C. Anumba. 2006. “Mobile ICT support for construction process improvement.” Autom. Constr. 15 (5): 664–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.08.004.
Dadi, G. B., P. M. Goodrum, T. R. Taylor, and C. M. Carswell. 2014a. “Cognitive workload demands using 2D and 3D spatial engineering information formats.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (5): 04014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000827.
Dadi, G. B., P. M. Goodrum, T. R. Taylor, and W. F. Maloney. 2014b. “Effectiveness of communication of spatial engineering information through 3D CAD and 3D printed models.” Visual Eng. 2 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-014-0009-8.
Dadi, G. B., T. R. Taylor, P. M. Goodrum, and W. F. Maloney. 2014c. “Performance of 3D computers and 3D printed models as a fundamental means for spatial engineering information visualization.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 41 (10): 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2014-0019.
Ekstrom, R. B., J. W. French, H. H. Harman, and D. Dermen. 1976. Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Fang, Y., and Y. K. Cho. 2015. “Analyzing construction workers’ recognition of hazards by estimating visual focus of attention.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Construction Engineering and Project Management (ICCEPM 2015), edited by B. Koo, Y. Jung, and L.-S. Kang, 248–251. Busan, Korea: Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management.
Goldberg, H. J., and X. P. Kotval. 1999. “Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs.” Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 24 (6): 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00068-7.
Goodrum, P., J. Miller, J. Sweany, and O. Alruwaythi. 2016. “Influence of the format of engineering information and spatial cognition on craft-worker performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (9): 04016043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001157.
Goodrum, P. M., and J. M. Miller. 2015. Innovative delivery methods of information to the crafts. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Hasanzadeh, S., B. Esmaeili, and M. D. Dodd. 2016. “Measuring construction workers’ real-time situation awareness using mobile eye-tracking.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan, 2894–2904. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Henderson, J. 2003. “Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.” Trends Cognit. Sci. 7 (11): 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006.
Jacob, R. J. K., and K. S. Karn. 2003. “Eye tracking in human–computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises.” Mind 2 (3): 4.
Just, M. A., and P. A. Carpenter. 1976. “Eye fixations and cognitive processes.” Cognit. Psychol. 8 (4): 441–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3.
Liberda, M., J. Ruwanpura, and G. Jergeas. 2003. “Construction productivity improvement: A study of human, management and external issues.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress, 1–8. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Naoum, S. G. 2016. “Factors influencing labor productivity on construction sites: A state of the art literature review and a survey.” Int. J. Productivity Perform. Manage. 65 (3): 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2015-0045.
Pinheiro, R. B. O., N. Pradhananga, R. Jianu, and W. Orabi. 2016. “Eye-tracking technology for construction safety: A feasibility study.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 33. Edmonton, Canada: Univ. of Alberta.
Poole, A., and L. J. Ball. 2005. “Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Current status and future prospects.” In Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction, edited by C. Ghaoui. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Quarles, J. P., S. Lampotang, I. Fischler, P. Fishwick, and B. Lok. 2008. “Tangible user interfaces compensate for low spatial cognition.” In Proc., IEEE 3D User Interfaces, 11–18. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
Sweany, J., P. Goodrum, and J. Miller. 2016. “Analysis of empirical data on the effects of the format of engineering deliverables on craft performance.” Autom. Constr. 69: 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.017.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145 • Issue 11 • November 2019
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 30, 2018
Accepted: Mar 11, 2019
Published online: Aug 26, 2019
Published in print: Nov 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jan 26, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.