Technical Papers
Jul 13, 2019

Quantifying the Similarity between Different Project Types Based on Their Pay Item Compositions: Application to Bundling

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145, Issue 9

Abstract

Similarity between project types is an important consideration in several contexts of construction management, including contract development, contractor selection, and project bundling. Projects that require similar types of resources can generally be considered compatible or similar and thus are prime candidates for simultaneous delivery through project bundling as well as other construction management applications. Unfortunately, there is no universally accepted, robust, and quantitative measure of project similarity. This paper presents a methodology to quantify the similarity between different project types based on their constituent pay items. Two project types are considered similar if they have in common a large percentage of pay items. Cluster analysis was first carried out to evaluate how different project types can be clustered into different groups. Several approaches were then proposed for quantifying the similarity between any two project types and the average similarity among multiple bundled projects. The paper’s framework can be used by highway agencies to serve as a guide in making or evaluating construction management–related decisions in various contexts including project bundling.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data analyzed during the study were provided by a third party. Requests for data should be directed to the provider indicated in the Acknowledgments. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Joint Transportation Research Program administered by the Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University. The assistance of the following individuals are acknowledged: Trevor Mills, Brad Steckler, Louis Feagans, Maan Omran, and Tim Wells.

References

Atkinson, R. 1999. “Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it is time to accept other success criteria.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (6): 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6.
Atkinson, R., L. Crawford, and S. Ward. 2006. “Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management.” Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (8): 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.011.
Baccarini, D. 1996. “The concept of project complexity—A review.” Int. J. Project Manage. 14 (4): 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3.
Baccarini, D. 1999. “The logical framework method for defining project success.” Project Manage. J. 30 (4): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000405.
Baker, B. N., D. C. Murphy, and D. Fisher. 2008. “Factors affecting project success.” In Project management handbook. 2nd ed., 902–919. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.
Bennett, J. 1991. International construction project management: General theory and practice. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Bennett, J., and B. Fine. 1980. Measurement of complexity in construction projects. Reading, UK: Dept. of Construction Management, Univ. of Reading.
Chan, A. P., D. Scott, and A. P. Chan. 2004. “Factors affecting the success of a construction project.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (1): 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(153).
Clarke, A. 1999. “A practical use of key success factors to improve the effectiveness of project management.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (3): 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00031-3.
Cooke-Davies, T. 2002. “The “real” success factors on projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 20 (3): 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9.
Damnjanovic, I., S. Anderson, A. Wimsatt, K. Reinschmidt, and D. Pandit. 2009. Evaluation of ways and procedures to reduce construction cost and increase competition. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
Dao, B., S. Kermanshachi, J. Shane, S. Anderson, and E. Hare. 2016. “Exploring and assessing project complexity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (5): 04016126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001275.
De Wit, A. 1988. “Measurement of project success.” Int. J. Project Manage. 6 (3): 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(88)90043-9.
Estache, A., and A. Iimi. 2008. Bidder asymmetry in infrastructure procurement: Are there any fringe bidders?. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Estache, A., and A. Iimi. 2011. “(Un)bundling infrastructure procurement: Evidence from water supply and sewage projects.” Util. Policy 19 (2): 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2010.12.003.
Gidado, K. 1993. “Numerical index of complexity in building construction to its effect on production time.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Environment and Technology, Univ. of Brighton.
Grimm, V., R. Pacini, G. Spagnolo, and M. Zanza. 2006. Division in lots and competition in procurement. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
Hartigan, J. A., and M. A. Wong. 1979. “Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C (Appl. Stat.) 28 (1): 100–108.
Kaufman, L., and P. J. Rousseeuw. 2009. Vol. 344 of Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.
Labi, S. 2014. Introduction to civil engineering systems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lubbock Avalanche-Journal. 2000. “Contract bundling may hurt small business.” Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, September 4, 2000.
Luo, L., Q. He, E. J. Jaselskis, and J. Xie. 2017. “Construction project complexity: research trends and implications.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (7): 04017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001306.
McCarthy, L. A., D. Mensching, and A. Horgan. 2011. Effective delivery of small-scale federal-aid projects. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Meyer, C. D. 2000. Vol. 71 of Matrix analysis and applied linear algebra. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Morris, P. W., and G. H. Hough. 1987. The anatomy of major projects: A study of the reality of project management. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Munns, A. K., and B. F. Bjeirmi. 1996. “The role of project management in achieving project success.” Int. J. Project Manage. 14 (2): 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00057-7.
Murtagh, F., and P. Legendre. 2014. “Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement Ward’s criterion?” J. Classification 31 (3): 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-014-9161-z.
Naber, G. L. 1992. The geometry of Minkowski spacetime. New York: Springer.
Nassar, K. M., and M. Y. Hegab. 2006. “Developing a complexity measure for project schedules.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (6): 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:6(554).
Puddicombe, M. S. 2011. “Novelty and technical complexity: Critical constructs in capital projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (5): 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000459.
Qiao, Y., S. Labi, J. Fricker, and K. C. Sinha. 2018a. “Costs and effectiveness of standard treatments applied to flexible and rigid pavements.” Infrastruct. Asset Manage. 6 (1): 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.17.00035.
Qiao, Y., T. U. Saeed, S. Chen, R. Nateghi, and S. Labi. 2018b. “Acquiring insights into infrastructure repair policy using discrete choice models.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 113 (1): 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.020.
Qiao, Y. J., J. D. Fricker, S. Labi, and T. Mills. 2018c. “Bundling bridge and other highway projects: Patterns and policies.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (1): 0361198118797804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118797804.
Qiao, Y. J., J. D. Fricker, S. Labi, and T. Mills. 2019a. “The influence of project bundling on maintenance of traffic (MOT) costs across highway project types.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (8): 05019010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001676.
Qiao, Y. J., S. Labi, and J. D. Fricker. 2019b. “Hazard-based duration models for predicting actual duration of highway projects using non-parametric and parametric survival analysis.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Rowlinson, S. M. 1988. “An analysis of factors affecting project performance in industrial building.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Building Technology, Brunel Univ.
Stocks, R. K., and S. P. Male. 1984. “An investigation into the client’s perceptions of contractual form and procedures: the instigation of good practice.” Proc., CIB W-65 Organization and Management of Construction, 291–299. Delft, Netherlands: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction.
Vanhoucke, M. 2018. “Planning projects with scarce resources: Yesterday, today and tomorrow’s research challenges.” Front. Eng. Manage. 5 (2): 133–149.
Williams, T. M. 1999. “The need for new paradigms for complex projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (5): 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00047-7.
Xiong, Y., J. D. Fricker, and S. Labi. 2017. “Bundling or grouping pavement and bridge projects: Analysis and strategies.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2613 (1): 37–44. https://doi.org/10.3141/2613-05.
Zhang, Y., A. Chini, E. Minchin, L. Ptschelinzew, and D. Shah. 2018. “Performance of seven highway construction contracting methods analyzed by project size.” Front. Eng. Manage. 5 (2): 240–250. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2018040.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145Issue 9September 2019

History

Received: Aug 11, 2018
Accepted: Feb 7, 2019
Published online: Jul 13, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Dec 13, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., 550 Stadium Mall Dr., W. Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., 550 Stadium Mall Dr., W. Lafayette, IN 47907. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5066-3326. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., 550 Stadium Mall Dr., W. Lafayette, IN 47907 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9830-2071. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share