Case Studies
Jun 24, 2019

Stakeholder Influence Pathways in Construction Projects: Multicase Study

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145, Issue 9

Abstract

Understanding external stakeholders’ influence is essential to achieving success; however, little attention has been paid to investigating their indirect influence on projects. This study aims to explore indirect pathways that external stakeholders normally pursue to affect construction projects and to develop a framework of stakeholder-influencing pathways. The authors adopted abductive reasoning, using a preliminary framework. Based on the framework, four process-tracing case studies in the Vietnamese construction industry were conducted for data collection and analysis. Newspapers were the main source of data, complemented by interviews and other archive data, such as press releases, petitions, blog postings, and official documents. All cases confirmed the pathway through which stakeholders induce decision-makers to exert pressure related to a project. Also, some unanticipated results were found: first, two additional pathways, comprising two or three causally ordered mediators, can be employed to affect projects; second, stakeholders tend to use multiple influence pathways in which some actors, such as governmental authorities and the public, have a high rate of occurrence; and third, a mediator can be affected by more than one successor, whereas some mediators are capable of influencing various predecessors. Accordingly, the preliminary framework was revised to match the unanticipated results. This study explores a preliminary mechanism that transmits stakeholder influences to a project via multiple causally ordered actors. It is also the first comprehensive investigation into stakeholder influence pathways in the built environment. The findings can assist managers in stakeholder prioritization and anticipating their influences on projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

References

Aaltonen, K., K. Jaakko, and O. Tuomas. 2008. “Stakeholder salience in global projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 26 (5): 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.004.
Aaltonen, K., and J. Kujala. 2010. “A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects.” Scand. J. Manage. 26 (4): 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.09.001.
Aaltonen, K., J. Kujala, L. Havela, and G. Savage. 2015. “Stakeholder dynamics during the project front-end: The case of nuclear waste repository projects.” Project Manage. J. 46 (6): 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21549.
Ackermann, F., and C. Eden. 2011. “Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice.” Long Range Plann. 44 (3): 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.08.001.
Almeida, P., and M. Lichbach. 2003. “To the internet, from the internet: Comparative media coverage of transnational protests.” Mobilization Int. Q. 8 (3): 249–272.
Anfara, V. A., Jr., and N. T. Mertz, eds. 2014. Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Aragonés-Beltrán, P., M. García-Melón, and J. Montesinos-Valera. 2017. “How to assess stakeholders’ influence in project management? A proposal based on the analytic network process.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (3): 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.001.
Barranco, J., and D. Wisler. 1999. “Validity and systematicity of newspaper data in event analysis.” Eur. Sociol. Rev. 15 (3): 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018265.
Beach, D., and R. B. Pedersen. 2016. Causal case study methods: Foundations and guidelines for comparing, matching, and tracing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Blatter, J., and M. Haverland. 2012. Designing case studies: Explanatory approaches in small-N research. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bourne, L., and D. H. T. Walker. 2005. “Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence.” Manage. Decis. 43 (5): 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510597680.
Boutilier, R. G., and M. Zdziarski. 2017. “Managing stakeholder networks for a social license to build.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 35 (8–9): 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1289229.
Brass, D. J. 1984. “Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization.” Administrative Sci. Q. 29 (4): 518–539. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392937.
Brass, D. J., and M. E. Burkhardt. 1993. “Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior.” Acad. Manage. J. 36 (3): 441–470. https://doi.org/10.5465/256588.
Caputo, A. 2013. “Systemic stakeholders’ management for real estate development projects.” Global Bus. Manage. Res. 5 (1): 66–82.
Chan, A. P. C., and G. D. Oppong. 2017. “Managing the expectations of external stakeholders in construction projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 24 (5): 736–756. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2016-0159.
Clausen, A., H. H. Vu, and M. Pedrono. 2011. “An evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Vietnam: The gap between theory and practice.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 31 (2): 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.008.
Dubois, A., and L.-E. Gadde. 2002. “Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research.” J. Bus. Res. 55 (7): 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8.
Easton, G. 2001. “Case research as a method for industrial networks: A realist apologia.” In Realist perspectives on management and organisations, edited by S. Ackroyd and S. Fleetwood, 205–219. London: Routledge.
Eesley, C., and M. J. Lenox. 2006. “Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action.” Strategic Manage. J. 27 (8): 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.536.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building theories from case study research.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 (4): 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385.
Eskerod, P., and A. Jepsen. 2013. Project stakeholder management. New York: Gower Publishing.
Falleti, T. G., and J. Mahoney. 2015. “The comparative sequential method.” In Advances in comparative historical analysis: Resilience, diversity, and change, edited by J. Mahoney and K. Thelen, 211–239. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Follmann, A. 2015. “Urban mega-projects for a ‘world-class’ riverfront—The interplay of informality, flexibility and exceptionality along the Yamuna in Delhi, India.” Habitat Int. 45 (Part 3): 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.02.007.
Frooman, J. 1999. “Stakeholder influence strategies.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 24 (2): 191–205. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893928.
Frooman, J., and A. J. Murrell. 2005. “Stakeholder influence strategies: The roles of structural and demographic determinants.” Bus. Soc. 44 (1): 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650304273434.
Gillespie, J. 2014. “Social consensus and the meta-regulation of land-taking disputes in Vietnam.” J. Vietnamese Stud. 9 (3): 91–124. https://doi.org/10.1525/vs.2014.9.3.91.
Grey, S. J. 2010. “When no “official record” exists?” Politics Gender 6 (4): 622–629. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X10000413.
Ha-Duong, M., L. A. Nguyën, T. Strange, and A. H. Truong. 2016. “Social acceptability of large infrastructure projects in Vietnam.” Field Actions Sci. Rep. 14: 72–81.
Hancock, D. R., and B. Algozzine. 2016. Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia Univ.
Hendry, J. R. 2005. “Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration.” J. Bus. Ethics 61 (1): 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-8502-6.
Henriques, I., and S. Sharma. 2005. “Pathways of stakeholder influence in the Canadian forestry industry.” Bus. Strategy Environ. 14 (6): 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.456.
Hill, C. W. L., and T. M. Jones. 1992. “Stakeholder-agency theory.” J. Manage. Stud. 29 (2): 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x.
Hsu, S.-H. 2005. “Advocacy coalitions and policy change on nuclear power utilization in Taiwan.” Social Sci. J. 42 (2): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2005.03.002.
Hunter, M. L., L. N. Van Wassenhove, M. Besiou, and M. van Halderen. 2013. “The agenda-setting power of stakeholder media.” Calif. Manage. Rev. 56 (1): 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2013.56.1.24.
Jacobs, R. N. 1996. “Civil society and crisis: Culture, discourse, and the Rodney King beating.” Am. J. Sociol. 101 (5): 1238–1272. https://doi.org/10.1086/230822.
Jiang, H., P. Lin, and M. Qiang. 2016. “Public-opinion sentiment analysis for large hydro projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 05015013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001039.
Jonsson, H., and M. Rudberg. 2015. “Production system classification matrix: Matching product standardization and production-system design.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (6): 0501500. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000965.
Jordhus-Lier, D. 2015. “Community resistance to megaprojects: The case of the N2 Gateway project in Joe Slovo informal settlement, Cape Town.” Habitat Int. 45 (Part 3): 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.02.006.
Kerkvliet, B. J. T. 2014. “Protests over land in Vietnam: Rightful resistance and more.” J. Vietnamese Stud. 9 (3): 19–54. https://doi.org/10.1525/vs.2014.9.3.19.
Ketokivi, M., and T. Choi. 2014. “Renaissance of case research as a scientific method.” J. Oper. Manage. 32 (5): 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004.
King, B. 2007. “A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence.” Bus. Soc. 47 (1): 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650307306636.
Kinsella, W. J. 2015. “Rearticulating nuclear power: Energy activism and contested common sense.” Environ. Commun. 9 (3): 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.978348.
Kovács, G., and K. M. Spens. 2005. “Abductive reasoning in logistics research.” Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. 35 (2): 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030510590318.
Labbé, D. 2015. “Media dissent and peri-urban land struggles in Vietnam: The case of the Văn Giang incident.” Crit. Asian Stud. 47 (4): 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2015.1079993.
Labbé, D., and C. Musil. 2013. “Periurban land redevelopment in Vietnam under market socialism.” Urban Stud. 51 (6): 1146–1161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013495574.
Li, H., X. Zhang, S. T. Ng, and M. Skitmore. 2018. “Quantifying stakeholder influence in decision/evaluations relating to sustainable construction in China—A Delphi approach.” J. Cleaner Prod. 173 (Feb): 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.151.
Lin, X., C. M. F. Ho, and G. Q. P. Shen. 2017. “Who should take the responsibility? Stakeholders’ power over social responsibility issues in construction projects.” J. Cleaner Prod. 154 (Jun): 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.007.
Marincioni, F., and F. Appiotti. 2009. “The Lyon-Turin high-speed rail: The public debate and perception of environmental risk in Susa Valley, Italy.” Environ. Manage. 43 (5): 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9271-2.
Martin, A. W. 2005. “Addressing the selection bias in media coverage of strikes: A comparison of mainstream and specialty print media.” In Research in social movements, conflicts and change, edited by P. G. Coy, 141–178. San Antonio, TX: Emerald Group Publishing.
Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Jossey-Bass education series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 22 (4): 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105.
Mok, K. Y., G. Q. Shen, and J. Yang. 2015. “Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (2): 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.007.
Nguyen, N. H., M. Skitmore, and J. K. W. Wong. 2009. “Stakeholder impact analysis of infrastructure project management in developing countries: A study of perception of project managers in state-owned engineering firms in Vietnam.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 27 (11): 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903280468.
Nguyen, T. H. D., N. Chileshe, and R. Rameezdeen. 2018a. “External stakeholder strategic actions in construction projects: A Vietnamese study.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 36 (8): 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1432866.
Nguyen, T. H. T., V. T. Tran, Q. T. Bui, Q. H. Man, and T. de Vries Walter. 2016. “Socio-economic effects of agricultural land conversion for urban development: Case study of Hanoi, Vietnam.” Land Use Policy 54 (Jul): 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.032.
Nguyen, T. S., S. Mohamed, and K. Panuwatwanich. 2018b. “Stakeholder management in complex project: Review of contemporary literature.” J. Eng. Project Prod. Manage. 8 (2): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.32738/JEPPM.201807.0003.
Olander, S. 2007. “Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 25 (3): 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600879125.
Olander, S., and A. Landin. 2005. “Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects.” Int. J. Project. Manage. 23 (4): 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.002.
Olander, S., and A. Landin. 2008. “A comparative study of factors affecting the external stakeholder management process.” Constr. Manag. Econ. 26 (6): 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701821810.
Oppong, G. D., A. P. C. Chan, and A. Dansoh. 2017. “A review of stakeholder management performance attributes in construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (6): 1037–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.015.
Ortmann, S. 2017. Environmental governance in Vietnam institutional reforms and failures. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Phuc, N. Q., A. C. M. van Westen, and A. Zoomers. 2014. “Agricultural land for urban development: The process of land conversion in Central Vietnam.” Habitat Int. 41 (Jan): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.06.004.
Project Management Institute. 2016. Construction extension to the PMBOK guide. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Roeder, T. 2013. Managing project stakeholders: Building a foundation to achieve project goals. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Rohlfing, I. 2012. Case studies and causal inference: An integrative framework. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rowley, T. I., and M. Moldoveanu. 2003. “When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 28 (2): 204–219. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416080.
Rowley, T. J. 1997. “Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 22 (4): 887–910. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107.
Runeson, P., M. Host, A. Rainer, and B. Regnell. 2012. Case study research in software engineering: Guidelines and examples. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Sallinen, L., I. Ruuska, and T. Ahola. 2013. “How governmental stakeholders influence large projects: the case of nuclear power plant projects.” Int. J. Managing Project Bus. 6 (1): 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371311291026.
Savage, G. T., T. W. Nix, C. J. Whitehead, and J. D. Blair. 1991. “Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders.” Executive 5 (2): 61–75. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274682.
Seawright, J., and J. Gerring. 2008. “Case selection techniques in case study research.” Polit. Res. Q. 61 (2): 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077.
Singer, J., H. T. Pham, and H. Hoang. 2014. “Broadening stakeholder participation to improve outcomes for dam-forced resettlement in Vietnam.” Water Resour. Rural Dev. 4 (Oct): 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wrr.2014.07.001.
Slunge, D., and T. T. H. Tran. 2014. “Challenges to institutionalizing strategic environmental assessment: The case of Vietnam.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 48 (Sep): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.05.005.
Stake, R. 2013. Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Strauch, L., G. Takano, and M. Hordijk. 2015. “Mixed-use spaces and mixed social responses: Popular resistance to a megaproject in Central Lima, Peru.” Habitat Int. 45 (Part 3): 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.02.005.
Strawn, K. 2008. “Validity and media-derived protest event data: Examining relative coverage tendencies in Mexican news media.” Mobilization: Int. Q. 13 (2): 147–164.
Sundquist, V., L.-E. Gadde, and K. Hulthén. 2017. “Reorganizing construction logistics for improved performance.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 36 (1): 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1356931.
Tavory, I., and S. Timmermans. 2014. Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, J. E., C. S. Dossick, and M. Garvin. 2011. “Meeting the burden of proof with case-study research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (4): 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000283.
Taylor, T. R. B., D. N. Ford, and K. F. Reinschmidt. 2012. “Impact of public policy and societal risk perception on US civilian nuclear power plant construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (8): 972–981. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000516.
To, P. X., S. Mahanty, and W. H. Dressler. 2015. ““A new landlord” (địa chủ mới)? Community, land conflict and State Forest Companies (SFCs) in Vietnam.” For. Policy Econ. 58 (Sep): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.10.005.
Tsai, P. C. F., C. R. Yeh, S.-L. Wu, and I.-C. Huang. 2005. “An empirical test of stakeholder influence strategy models: Evidence from business downsizing in Taiwan.” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 16 (10): 1862–1885. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500298479.
Tzu, S. 2009. The art of war. Translated by L. Giles. Washington, DC: Pax Librorum Publishing House.
Upstill-Goddard, J., J. Glass, A. Dainty, and I. Nicholson. 2016. “Implementing sustainability in small and medium-sized construction firms.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 23 (4): 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2015-0015.
Valentin, V., N. Naderpajouh, and D. Abraham. 2018. “Impact of characteristics of infrastructure projects on public opinion.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (1): 04017051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000576.
Walker, D. H. T., L. M. Bourne, and A. Shelley. 2008. “Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 26 (6): 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701882390.
Williams, N. L., N. Ferdinand, and B. Pasian. 2015. “Online stakeholder interactions in the early stage of a megaproject.” Project Manage. J. 46 (6): 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21548.
Winch, G. M. 2007. “Managing project stakeholders.” In The Wiley guide to managing projects, edited by J. K. Pinto and P. W. Morris, 321–339. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Xia, N., R. Zhong, C. Wu, X. Wang, and S. Wang. 2017. “Assessment of stakeholder-related risks in construction projects: Integrated analyses of risk attributes and stakeholder influences.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (8): 04017030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001322.
Yang, J., G. Q. Shen, D. S. Drew, and M. Ho. 2010. “Critical success factors for stakeholder management: Construction practitioners’ perspectives.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (7): 778–786. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000180.
Yin, R. 2011. Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. 2013. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Yue, A. R. 2010. “Validity.” In Encyclopedia of case study research, edited by A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, and E. Wiebe, 959–963. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Zietsma, C., and M. I. Winn. 2007. “Building chains and directing flows.” Bus. Soc 47 (1): 68–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650307306641.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145Issue 9September 2019

History

Received: Apr 20, 2018
Accepted: Jan 22, 2019
Published online: Jun 24, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Nov 24, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tan Hai Dang Nguyen [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Natural and Built Environments, Univ. of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Nicholas Chileshe
Associate Professor, School of Natural and Built Environments, Natural and Built Environments Research Centre, Univ. of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Raufdeen Rameezdeen
Associate Professor, School of Natural and Built Environments, Natural and Built Environments Research Centre, Univ. of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
School of Natural and Built Environments, Natural and Built Environments Research Centre, Univ. of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2206-1165

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share