Technical Papers
Jan 19, 2016

Cost Performance as a Stochastic Process: EAC Projection by Markov Chain Simulation

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142, Issue 6

Abstract

Earned value analysis (EVA) has been widely used in the construction industry for cost prediction at completion. The EVA’s accuracy of early cost projections is low since the method assumes static cost performance during construction. A project’s cost performance is evidenced as a stochastic process. In an effort to improve the EVA’s accuracy of early cost predictions, this work reports a modified method of Markovian simulation cost projection (MSCP). Based on Markov chain simulation, MSCP simulates the probability distribution of the cost performance indicators for each period of a project, and predicts the final cost using the summation of each simulated period cost. The MSCP method is demonstrated and validated through a case study of a real-world power plant project. Data analysis indicates that MSCP improves the prediction accuracy four times higher than EVA. Findings also suggest that MSCP is able to capture erratic changes of cost performance throughout a project’s lifecycle and thus provides better EAC (estimate at completion) predictions and early warnings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Agdas, D., Davidson, M. T., and Ellis, R. D. (2011). “Efficiency comparison of Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation with subset simulation (MCMC/ss) to standard Monte Carlo simulation (sMC) for extreme event scenarios.” Vulnerability, uncertainty, and risk analysis, modeling, and management, ASCE, Reston, VA, 86–95.
Aiken, P., Muntz, A., and Richards, R. (1994). “DoD legacy systems: Reverse engineering data requirements.” Commun. ACM, 37(5), 26–41.
Anderson, T. W., and Darling, D. A. (1954). “A test of goodness of fit.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 49(268), 765–769.
Asmussen, S. (2003). Applied probability and queues, Springer, Berlin.
Attalla, M., and Hegazy, T. (2003). “Predicting cost deviation in reconstruction projects: Artificial neural networks versus regression.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 405–411.
Au, S. (2004). “Probabilistic failure analysis by importance sampling Markov chain simulation.” J. Eng. Mech., 303–311.
Baker, B. N., Murphy, D. C., and Fisher, D. (2008). “Factors affecting project success.” Project management handbook, 2nd Ed., Elsevier, Philadelphia, 902–919.
Baloi, D., and Price, A. D. (2003). “Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance.” Int. J. Project Manage., 21(4), 261–269.
Barraza, G. A., Back, W. E., and Mata, F. (2004). “Probabilistic forecasting of project performance using stochastic S curves.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 25–32.
Chen, H. L. (2014). “Improving forecasting accuracy of project earned value metrics: Linear modeling approach.” J. Manage. Eng., 135–145.
Chou, J.-S., Yang, I., and Chong, W. K. (2009). “Probabilistic simulation for developing likelihood distribution of engineering project cost.” Autom. Constr., 18(5), 570–577.
Devroye, L. (1986). “Sample-based non-uniform random variate generation.” Proc., 18th Conf. on Winter Simulation, ACM, Washington, DC, 260–265.
Doob, J. L. (1953). Stochastic processes, Wiley, New York.
Fleming, Q. W., and Koppelman, J. M. (2000). Earned value project management, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.
Hajjar, D., and AbouRizk, S. M. (1998). “Modeling and analysis of aggregate production operations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 390–401.
Hill, T., and Lewicki, P. (2006). Statistics: Methods and applications: A comprehensive reference for science, industry, and data mining, StatSoft, Tulsa, OK.
Hong, T., Han, S., and Lee, S. (2007). “Simulation-based determination of optimal life-cycle cost for FRP bridge deck panels.” Autom. Constr., 16(2), 140–152.
Howell, G., and Ballard, G. (1997). “Factors affecting project success in the piping function.” Lean Construction, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 161–185.
Howes, R. (2000). “Improving the performance of earned value analysis as a construction project management tool.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 7(4), 399–411.
Kim, B. (2014). “Dynamic control thresholds for consistent earned value analysis and reliable early warning.” J. Manage. Eng., 04014077.
Kim, B., and Kim, H. (2014). “Sensitivity of earned value schedule forecasting to S-curve patterns.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04014023.
Kim, B.-C. (2015). “Probabilistic evaluation of cost performance stability in earned value management.” J. Manage. Eng., 04015025.
Kim, B.-C., and Reinschmidt, K. F. (2010). “Probabilistic forecasting of project duration using Kalman filter and the earned value method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 834–843.
Kim, B.-C., and Reinschmidt, K. F. (2011). “Combination of project cost forecasts in earned value management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 958–966.
Kim, G.-H., An, S.-H., and Kang, K.-I. (2004). “Comparison of construction cost estimating models based on regression analysis, neural networks, and case-based reasoning.” Build. Environ., 39(10), 1235–1242.
Law, A. M., Kelton, W. D., and Kelton, W. D. (1991). Simulation modeling and analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Lee, S. H., Pena-Mora, F., and Park, M. (2006). “Dynamic planning and control methodology for strategic and operational construction project management.” Autom. Constr., 15(1), 84–97.
Lema, N., and Price, A. (1996). “Construction process performance variability: Focus on labour productivity.” Build. Res. Inf., 24(6), 339–350.
Leonard, B. (2009). GAO Cost estimating and assessment guide: Best practices for developing and managing capital program costs, DIANE, Washington, DC.
Lipke, W., Zwikael, O., Henderson, K., and Anbari, F. (2009). “Prediction of project outcome: The application of statistical methods to earned value management and earned schedule performance indexes.” Int. J. Project Manage., 27(4), 400–407.
Lu, M., Lam, H.-C., and Dai, F. (2008). “Resource-constrained critical path analysis based on discrete event simulation and particle swarm optimization.” Autom. Constr., 17(6), 670–681.
Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). “On the generalized distance in statistics.” Proc., National Institute of Sciences of India, Vol. 2, National Institute of Sciences of India, New Delhi, India.
Molloy, M. K. (1982). “Performance analysis using stochastic Petri nets.” Comput. IEEE Trans., C-31(9), 913–917.
Mooney, C. Z. (1997). Monte Carlo simulation, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Morcous, G. (2006). “Performance prediction of bridge deck systems using Markov chains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 146–155.
Moré, J. J. (1978). “The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: Implementation and theory.” Numerical analysis, Springer, Berlin, 105–116.
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). (2011). “Monte Carlo simulation tool determines logistical support resources scenarios.” 〈http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/techtransfer/technology/MSC-24823-1-faster.html#.U7bx2_ldV8E〉 (Jul. 4, 2014).
Oh, J., and Tsai, C. W. (2011). “A comparative study on Lagrangian stochastic models for sediment transport.” Proc., 2011 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 2370–2378.
Okpala, D. C., and Aniekwu, A. N. (1988). “Causes of high costs of construction in Nigeria.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 233–244.
Project Management Institute. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK guide, 4th Ed., Newtown Square, VA.
Project Management Institute. (2011). Practice standard for scheduling, 2nd Ed., Newtown Square, VA, 130.
Qiao, S., and Liu, B. (2006). “Prediction of ground displacement and deformation induced by dewatering of groundwater.” Proc., Underground Construction Ground Movement, ASCE, Reston, VA, 73–79.
Sadeghi, N., Fayek, A. R., and Pedrycz, W. (2010). “Fuzzy Monte Carlo simulation and risk assessment in construction.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 25(4), 238–252.
Schoonjans, F., De Bacquer, D., and Schmid, P. (2011). “Estimation of population percentiles.” Epidemiology, 22(5), 750–751.
Schreckenberg, M., Schadschneider, A., Nagel, K., and Ito, N. (1995). “Discrete stochastic models for traffic flow.” Phys. Rev. E, 51(4), 2939–2949.
Smith, D. (1994). “Incorporating risk into capital budgeting decisions using simulation.” Manage. Decis., 32(9), 20–26.
Thomas, O., and Sobanjo, J. (2013). “Comparison of Markov chain and semi-Markov models for crack deterioration on flexible pavements.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 186–195.
Tian, J., Yang, M., and Li, S. (2008). “Research on coordinated supply-production-distribution plan model in supply chain under stochastic demand.” Proc., Logistics: The Emerging Frontiers of Transportation and Development in China, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1001–1006.
Touran, A. (1997). “Probabilistic model for tunneling project using Markov chain.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 444–449.
Trost, S. M., and Oberlender, G. D. (2003). “Predicting accuracy of early cost estimates using factor analysis and multivariate regression.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 198–204.
Turkan, Y., Bosché, F., Haas, C. T., and Haas, R. (2013). “Toward automated earned value tracking using 3D imaging tools.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 423–433.
U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (1997). “Guiding principles for Monte Carlo analysis.” Washington, DC.
Wen, L. (1991). “An analytic technique to prove Borel’s strong law of large numbers.” Am. Math. Mon., 98(2), 146–148.
Williams, B. M., and Hoel, L. A. (1999). “Modeling and forecasting vehicular traffic flow as a seasonal stochastic time series process.” Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA.
WSDOT (Washington State Department Transportation). (2012). “Use of risk-based project estimates for budgeting and project management.” Seattle.
Yi, Y. K., and Malkawi, A. M. (2012). “Site-specific optimal energy form generation based on hierarchical geometry relation.” Autom. Constr., 2012(26), 77–91.
Younes, B., Bouferguène, A., Al-Hussein, M., and Yu, H. (2014). “Overdue invoice management: Markov chain approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04014062.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142Issue 6June 2016

History

Received: Feb 27, 2015
Accepted: Oct 28, 2015
Published online: Jan 19, 2016
Published in print: Jun 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 19, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jing Du, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction Science, Texas A&M Univ., Francis Hall 333, College Station, TX 77843 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Byung-Cheol Kim, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ohio Univ., 114 Stocker Center, Athens, OH 45701-2927. E-mail: [email protected]
Dong Zhao, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Planning, Design and Construction, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share