Technical Papers
May 12, 2014

Mathematical Formulation of the Project Quarterback Rating: New Framework to Assess Construction Project Performance

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140, Issue 8

Abstract

This paper presents the definition and the mathematical formulation of a unique performance metric called the project quarterback rating (PQR). The PQR gives a specific score for each construction project based on a set of key variables affecting project performance and outcome. The importance of the PQR is found in its ability to quantitatively assess overall performance from the contractor’s perspective, taking into account key performance areas, which include customer satisfaction, schedule, cost, profit, and communication. A practical application comparing the performance of several recently completed projects is also presented in this paper to illustrate the new model. This application shows one of many possibilities for how PQR can be used to solve industry problems and to fill an existing gap in the literature. This research offers a contribution to the construction engineering and management literature and to the architecture/engineering/construction (AEC) industry. It is the creation of a unified project performance metric for a practical comparison of overall performance for any construction project.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Al-Momani, A. (2000). “Construction delay: A quantitative analysis.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 18(1), 51–59.
Alzahrani, J., and Emsley, M. (2013). “The impact of contractors’ attributes on construction project success: A post construction evaluation.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 31(2), 313–322.
Assaf, S. A., and Al-Hejji, S. (2006). “Causes of delay in large construction projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 24(4), 349–357.
Black, C., Akintoye, A., and Fitzgerald, E. (2000). “An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 18(6), 423–434.
Chan, A., Chan, D., Chiang, Y., Tang, B., Chan, E., and Ho, K. (2004a). ”Exploring critical success factors for partnering in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 188–198.
Chan, A., Ho, D., and Tam, C. (2001). ”Design and build project success factors: Multivariate analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 93–100.
Chan, A., Scott, D., and Chan, A. (2004b). ”Factors affecting the success of a construction project.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 153–155.
Chan, A., Scott, D., and Lam, E. (2002). “Framework of success criteria for design/build projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 120–128.
Chan, D., and Kumaraswamy, M. (1997). “A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong construction projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 15(1), 55–63.
Chao, L., and Hsiao, C. (2012). “Fuzzy model for predicting project performance based on procurement experiences.” Autom. Constr., 28, 71–81.
Cheng, E., Li, H., and Love, P. (2000). “Establishment of critical success factors for construction partnering.” J. Manage. Eng., 84–92.
Chua, D., Kog, Y., and Loh, P. (1999). “Critical success factors for different project objectives.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 142–150.
The Construction Users Roundtable (CURT). (2004). “Collaboration, integrated information, and the project lifecycle in building design, construction and operation.” 〈http://codebim.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/CurtCollaboration.pdf〉 (July 7, 2013).
The Construction Users Roundtable (CURT). (2007). “Construction strategy: CURT’s path toward LEAN project delivery.” 〈http://www.iglc15.org/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/wp_curt.pdf〉 (Jun. 24, 2013).
Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). “The ‘real’ success factors on projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 20(3), 185–190.
Dang, C., Le-Hoai, L., and Lee, Y. (2012). “Critical success factors of large design-build projects in Vietnam.” J. Constr. Eng. Proj. Manage., 30–39.
Dawood, N. (2010). “Development of 4D-based performance indicators in construction industry.” Eng., Constr. Architect. Manage., 17(2), 210–230.
Dedobbeleer, N., and Béland, F. (1991). “A safety climate measure for construction sites.” J. Saf. Res., 22(2), 97–103.
Economist. (2000). “Construction and the internet new wiring.” Economist, 86.
El Asmar, M. (2012). “Modeling and benchmarking performance for the integrated project delivery (IPD) system.” Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI.
El Asmar, M., Hanna, A., and Loh, W. (2013). “Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04013012.
Hale, D., Shrestha, P., Gibson, G., and Migliaccio, G. (2009). ”Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 579–587.
Konchar, B. M., and Sanvido, V. (1998). “Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 435–444.
Lam, E., Chan, A., and Chan, D. (2007). “Benchmarking the performance of design-build projects: Development of project success index.” Benchmark. Int. J., 14(5), 624–638.
Lam, E., Chan, A., and Chan, D. (2008). “Determinants of successful design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 333–341.
Li, H., Arditi, D., and Wang, Z. (2012). “Transaction-related issues and construction project performance.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 30(2), 151–164.
Ling, F. (2004). “Key determinants of performance of design-bid-build projects in Singapore.” Build. Res. Inf., 32(2), 128–139.
Ling, F., Chan, S., Chong, E., and Ee, L. (2004). “Predicting performance of design-build and design-bid-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 75–83.
Menches, C. L., and Hanna, A. S. (2006). “Quantitative measurement of successful performance from the project manager’s perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1284.
Migliaccio, G., Bogus, S., and Chen, A. (2010). “Effect of duration of design-build procurement on performance of transportation projects.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 67–73.
Minchin, R., Li, X., Issa, R., and Vargas, G. (2013). “Comparison of cost and time performance of design-build and design-bid-build delivery systems in Florida.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04013007.
Molenaar, K. R. (1995). “Appropriate project characteristics for public sector design-build projects.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Molenaar, K. R., Songer, A. D., and Barash, M. (1999). “Public-sector design/build evolution and performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 54–62.
Odeha, A., and Battaineh, H. (2002). “Causes of construction delay: Traditional contracts.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 20(1), 67–73.
Ogunlana, S. O., Promkuntong, K., and Jearkjirm, V. (1996). “Construction delays in a fast-growing economy: Comparing Thailand with other economies.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 14(1), 37–45.
Pocock, J. B., Hyun, C. T., Liu, L. Y., and Kim, M. K. (1996). “Relationship between project interaction and performance indicators.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 165–176.
Rankin, J., Fayek, A. R., Meade, G., Haas, C., and Manseau, A. (2008). “Initial metrics and pilot program results for measuring the performance of the Canadian construction industry.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 35(9), 894–907.
Sanvido, V., Grobler, F., Parfitt, K., Guvenis, M., and Coyle, M. (1992). “Critical success factors for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 94–111.
Shrestha, P., and Mani, N. (2012). “Impact of design cost on design bid build project performance.” Construction Research Congress, Vol. 2012, 1570–1579.
Songer, A. D., and Molenaar, K. R. (1996). “Selecting design-build: Public and private sector owner attitudes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 47–53.
Thomsen, C., Darrington, J., Dunne, D., and Lichtig, W. (2010). “Managing integrated project delivery.” Construction Management Association of America. 〈http://cmaa.com/files/shared/IPD_White_Paper_1.pdf〉, (Jun. 26, 2013).
Westerveld, E. (2003). “The project excellence model: Linking success criteria and critical success factors.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 21(6), 411–418.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140Issue 8August 2014

History

Received: Sep 10, 2013
Accepted: Mar 18, 2014
Published online: May 12, 2014
Published in print: Aug 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 12, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Awad S. Hanna, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Chair, Construction Engineering and Management, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, 2320 Engineering Hall, 1415 Engineering Dr., Madison, WI 53706 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Wafik Lotfallah [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Mathematics and Actuarial Science, American Univ. in Cairo, AUC Ave., P.O. Box 74, New Cairo 11835, Egypt; and Visiting Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, 2256 Engineering Hall, 1415 Engineering Dr., Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: [email protected]
Diane G. Aoun [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, 2256 Engineering Hall, 1415 Engineering Dr., Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: [email protected]
Mounir El Asmar, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box 870204, Tempe, AZ 85287-0204. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share