Technical Papers
Jul 29, 2013

Trade-Level Productivity Measurement: Critical Challenges and Solutions

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 11

Abstract

The construction industry is labor intensive by nature; consequently, the measurement of trade-level productivity is a critical component that can be used to assess the overall productivity of the industry. Despite its importance, little research has been conducted to investigate the challenges that contractors and subcontractors face in measuring productivity accurately at the trade level. As a result, this study aims to identify critical challenges in the measurement of trade-level productivity and to explore plausible solutions for these challenges in order to improve productivity assessment in the industry. On the basis of an extensive literature review and a survey and interviews with industry experts, a total of 17 critical challenges and 24 plausible solutions were identified and analyzed statistically. The findings from this study will help to shed light on the difficulties that contractors and subcontractors encounter during trade-level productivity measurement, and will identify solutions that can be used effectively to deal with these challenges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Azhar, S., and Ahmed, S. M. (2007). “Development of a productivity information management system using data warehousing for construction organizations.” Proc., 2007 Construction Research Congress, Freeport, Bahamas.
Bernstein, H. M. (2003). “Measuring productivity: An industry challenge.” Civ. Eng., 73(12), 46–53.
Building Futures Council. (2006). Measuring productivity and evaluating innovation in the U.S. construction industry, Arlington, VA, 〈http://www.thebfc.org/uploads/BFC_Productivity_whitepaper.pdf〉 (Dec. 20, 2011).
Chan, P., and Kaka, A. (2004). “Construction productivity measurement: A comparison of two case studies.” Proc., 20th Annual Conf., ARCOM, Salt Lake City, UT, 3–12.
Chang, L.-M. (1991). “Measuring construction productivity.” Cost Eng., 33(10), 19–25.
Chapman, R. E., and Butry, D. T. (2009). Measuring and improving the productivity of the U.S. construction industry: Issues, challenges, and opportunities, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
Crawford, P., and Vogl, B. (2006). Measuring productivity in the construction industry, Industry Economics and Statistics, London.
Gong, J., and Caldas, H. C. (2011). “An object recognition, tracking and contextual reasoning-based video interpretation method for rapid productivity analysis of construction operations.” Autom. Constr., 20(8), 1211–1226.
Goodrum, P. M., Haas, C. T., Caldas, C., Zhai, D., Yeiser, J., and Homm, D. (2011). “Model to predict the impact of a technology on construction productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 137(9), 678–688.
Haskell, P. H. (2004). “Construction industry productivity: Its history and future direction.” 〈http://www.dbia.org/pubs/dateline/archives/2005/06-05/Features/1206haskell.htm〉 (Dec. 20, 2011).
Jarkas, A. M. (2012). “Influence of buildability factors on rebar installation labor productivity of columns.” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 138(2), 258–267.
Jergeas, G. F., Chishty, S. M., and Leitner, J. M. (2000). “Construction productivity: A survey of industry practices.” AACE Int. Trans., 6, 1–7.
Liao, P. C., O’Brien, W., Thomas, R. T., Dai, J., and Mulva, P. S. (2011). “Factors affecting engineering productivity.” J. Manag. Eng., 27(4), 229–235.
Lim, E. C., and Alum, J. (1995). “Construction productivity: Issues encountered by contractors in Singapore.” Int. J. Project Manag., 13(1), 51–58.
Ministry of Manpower, and Ministry of National Development of Singapore. (1999)., Singapore.
Motwani, J., Kumar, A., and Novakoski, M. (1995). “Measuring construction productivity: A practical approach.” Work Stud., 44(8), 18–20.
Muqeem, S., and Idrus, A. (2011). “Prediction modeling of construction labour productivity rates using artificial neural network.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Environmental Science and Technology, IACSIT Press, Singapore, 32–36.
National Research Council. (1979). Panel to review productivity statistics (1979): Measurement and interpretation of productivity, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Noor, I. (1998). “Measuring construction labor productivity by daily visits.” Proc., 42nd Annual Meeting, AACE International, Morgantown, WV, 1–6.
Ofori, G., Chan, W. T., and Cheah, W. B. (2003). Productivity of the construction industry in Singapore, research rep., Dept. of Building, School of Design and Environment, National Univ. of Singapore, Singapore.
Park, H., Thomas, S., and Tucker, R. (2005). “Benchmarking of construction productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 131(7), 772–778.
Prokopenko, J. (1987). Productivity management: A practical handbook, International Labor Organization, Geneva.
Ranasinghe, U., Ruwanpura, J., and Liu, X. (2012). “Streamlining the construction productivity improvement process with the proposed role of a construction productivity improvement officer.” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 138(6), 697–706.
Rivas, R. A., Borcherding, J. D., González, V., and Alarcón, L. F. (2011). “Analysis of factors influencing productivity using craftsmen questionnaires: Case study in a Chilean construction company.” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 137(4), 312–320.
Song, L., and AbouRizk, S. M. (2008). “Measuring and modeling labor productivity using historical data.” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 134(10), 786–794.
Talhouni, B. T. (1990). “Measurement and analysis of construction labor productivity.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Dundee, UK.
Thomas, H. R., and Kramer, D. F. (1998). Manual of construction productivity measurement and performance evaluation, Construction Industry Institute, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Tuttle, T. C., and Sink, D. S. (2007). Taking the threat out of productivity measurement, Wiley, New York.
Wang, S. Q. (1999). “Improving construction productivity by management.” Proc., of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Construction Industry Development and 1st Conf. of CIB TG29 on Construction in Developing Countries: Construction Industry Development in the New Millennium, School of Building and Real Estate, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 419–429.
Zhang, X., Bakis, N., Lukins, T. C., Ibrahim, Y. M., Wu, S., and Kagioglou, M. (2009). “Automating progress measurement of construction projects.” Autom. Constr., 18(3), 294–301.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139Issue 11November 2013

History

Received: Dec 14, 2012
Accepted: Jun 20, 2013
Published online: Jul 29, 2013
Published in print: Nov 1, 2013
Discussion open until: Dec 29, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bon-Gang Hwang [email protected]
A.M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Building, School of Design and Environment, National Univ. of Singapore, Singapore 157766 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Chin Kiat Soh
Management Assistant, Project Management, LHN Group, 10 Raeburn Park #02-18, Singapore 088702.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share