Technical Papers
Jan 27, 2014

How the Design and Assessment of Instruction/Learning Strategies Influence the Academic Performance of Civil Engineering Students at Universidad Industrial De Santander, Colombia

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140, Issue 4

Abstract

This paper discusses the findings and experiences drawn from a study on the design of content and instruction strategies for an introductory course in construction management at the Universidad Industrial de Santander in Colombia. The research aimed at boosting the students’ performance through the assessment of instruction strategies and course content that can match the education demands needed to support the economical and social development of the country. The study adopted a sequential and exploratory research design with a longitudinal approach. The researchers found that Colombian students prefer courses that combine theory with practice in class, such as workshops, as instruction strategies. In addition, the results showed a degree of improvement in the academic performance of the students. Such improvement was statistically significant with a higher average level of academic achievement and a more consistent achievement of learning outcomes among the enrolled students.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The researchers would like to thank the survey participants, who were students in the Construction I, Construction II, and Project Estimating courses in the Department of Civil Engineering at UIS.

References

Acevedo, S. C. (2007). “Diseño de un Plan de Mejoramiento de los Procesos de Enseñanza-Aprendizaje de la Asignatura de Construcción II.” Trabajo de grado para optar al título de Ingeniero Civil. Director: Guillermo Mejía-Aguilar. Escuela de Ingeniería Civil Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Arbeláez, R. (2010). Evaluación del Aprendizaje en la Educación Superior. Bucaramanga: CEDEUIS. Universidad Industrial de Santander, Colombia, 183.
ASCE. (2009). Achieving the vision for civil engineering in 2025: A roadmap for the profession, Reston, VA.
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Ingeniería (ACOFI). (2006). “Educación en ingeniería frente a los Acuerdos de Libre Comercio.” Revista de engeniería, 24 (Junio 2006), ACOFI, Bogotá, Colombia.
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Ingeniería (ACOFI) e Institutito Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación (ICFES). (1996). Actualización y modernización del currículo en ingeniería civil: Documento final, ACOFI, Bogotá, Colombia.
ASQ Global Community. (2011). “Quality Assurance and Quality Control.” 〈http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/quality-assurance-quality-control/overview/overview.html〉 (Sep. 20, 2011).
Bankel, J. J., Berggren, K. F., Blom, K. K., Crawley, E. F., Wiklund, I. I., and Ostlund, S. S. (2003). “The CDIO syllabus: A comparative study of expected student proficiency.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., 28(3), 297–316.
Caro, S. S. (2003). “The paradigm of civil engineering education within the Colombian context.” Int. Conf. on Engineering Education, Valencia, Spain.
Chinowsky, P. S. (2002). “Integrating management breadth in civil engineering education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 138–143.
Chinowsky, P. S. (2009). “An open letter to the profession: Civil engineering education at a crossroads.” Leadership Manage. Eng., 55–56.
Chinowsky, P. S., and Songer, A. D. (2005). “The integrator model for the construction professional of 2020.” ASCE Conf. Proc., Vol. 183, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Congressional Research Service Reports (CRS). (2006). “CRS report for Congress.” Order Code RS22419, 〈http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RS22419.pdf〉 (Sep. 20, 2011).
Corredor, M. V., Pérez, M. I., and Arbeláez, R. (2009). Estrategias de enseñanza y aprendizaje, Bucaramanga: CEDEDUIS. Universidad Industrial de Santander.
Cowan, J., and Harding, A. (1986). “A logical model for curriculum development.” Br. J. Educ. Technol., 17(2), 103–109.
Creswell, J. W. (1999). “Mixed method research: Introduction and application.” Handbook of educational policy, T. Cijek, ed., Academic Press, San Diego, 455–472.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 2nd Ed., Merrill, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Doing Business. (2010). “Measuring business regulations. Most improved business reforms.” DB 2010, 〈http://www.doingbusiness.org/reforms/top-reformers-2010/〉 (Sep. 20, 2011).
Entwistle, N. J., and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning, Croom Helm, London.
Estévez, E. H. (2002). Enseñar a aprender, Editorial Paidós, México.
Felder, M. R., and Silverman, L., (1988). “Learning and teaching styles in engineering education.” Eng. Educ., 78(7), 674–681.
Gibbs, G. (1981). Teaching students to learn: A student-centered approach, Open University Press, Maidenhead, U.K.
Grau, D., Back, W. E., Mejia-Aguilar, G., and Morris, R. C. (2012). “Impact of a construction management educational intervention on the expertise and work practice of non-construction engineers” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 73–85.
Honey, P., and Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles, Peter Honey, Maidenhead, U.K.
Houser, R. (2009). Counseling and educational research: Evaluation and application, 2nd Ed., Sage, Los Angeles.
International Trade Administration (ITA). (2012). 〈http://blog.trade.gov/2012/05/15/u-s-colombia-trade-promotion-agreement-now-in-force/〉 (Sep. 20, 2011).
Kelly, W. A. (1982). Psicología de la educación, 7th Ed., Ediciones Morata S. A., Madrid.
Kuprenas, J. A., Haraga, R. K., De Chanbeau, D. L., and Smith, J. C. (2000). “Performance measurement of training in engineering organizations.” J. Manage. Eng., 27–33.
Marton, F., Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N. J. (1984). The experience of learning, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, U.K.
Maya, A. (2007). El taller educativo. ¿Qué es? Fundamentos, cómo organizarlo y dirigirlo, cómo evaluarlo, 2nd Ed., Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio, Bogotá, Colombia.
Mejía, A. G. (2004). “Prospectiva Curricular en el Área de Gestión de la Construcción para el Programa de Ingeniería Civil de la Universidad Industrial de Santander.” Revista UIS Ingenierías, 3(2), 159–165.
Mitchell, G. (1998). The trainer’s handbook: The AMA guide to effective training, 3rd Ed., AMACOM, Division of American Management Association, New York.
Montgomery, S. M., and Groat, L. N. (1998). “Student learning styles and their implications for teaching.”, Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Morgan, D. (1998). “Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research.” Qual. Health Res., 8(3), 362–376.
National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020 adapting engineering education to the new century, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
NCSU. (2013). “Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire.” 〈http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html〉 (Feb. 10, 2013).
Oglesby, C. H. (1990). “Dilemmas facing construction education and research in 1990s.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 4–17.
Peña, C. I. (2007). “El modelo de estilos de aprendizaje de Felder y Silverman (FSLSM).” Documento pdf. Centro de Tecnologías de Investigación y Comunicación (CENTIC) UIS, Bucaramanga.
Pinilla, A. E. (1999). Reflexiones en educación universitaria, Editorial Unilibros, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Robinson, J. A. (2005). “A normal Latin American country? A perspective on Colombian development.” Harvard Univ. Dept. of Government, CERP, CIAR, and NBER, 〈http://scholar.harvard.edu/jrobinson/files/jr_normalcountry.pdf〉 (Sep. 20, 2011).
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
Starico, M. (1999). Los proyectos en el aula: Hacia un aprendizaje significativo en una escuela para la diversidad, 3rd Ed., Magisterio del Río de Plata, Buenos Aires.
Theodora. (2010). “Colombia economy 2010.” 〈http://www.theodora.com/wfbcurrent/colombia/colombia_economy.html〉 (Sep. 20, 2011).
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Martin, E., and Ramsden, P. (2000). “Discipline differences in relations between learning, teaching and ways of leading teaching departments.” Improving student learning: Improving student learning through the disciplines, C. Rust, ed., Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford, U.K., 502–509.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2006). “Decenio de las Naciones Unidas de la Educación para el Desarrollo sostenible (2005–2014).” Plan de Aplicación Internacional, UNESCO, 〈http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001486/148654so.pdf〉 (Sep. 20, 2011).
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2010). “Engineering: Issues, challenges and opportunities for development.” UNESCO International Engineering Rep., World Federation of Engineering Organizations; International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences; International Federation of Consulting Engineers, 〈http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001897/189753e.pdf〉 (Sep. 20, 2011).
Universidad Industrial de Santander (UIS). (2007). “Lineamientos para la Construcción del Plan de Desarrollo Institucional 2008–2018.” Oficina de Planeación UIS, Bucaramanga, Septiembre de 2007.
Woollacott, L. C. (2009). “Validating the CDIO syllabus for engineering education using the taxonomy of engineering competencies.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., 34(6), 545–559.
Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., and Bunting, C. F. (2011). “Problem-based learning in electrical engineering.” J. Eng. Educ., 100(2), 253–280.
Yin, R., (1994). Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd Ed., Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140Issue 4April 2014

History

Received: Oct 26, 2012
Accepted: Feb 25, 2013
Published online: Jan 27, 2014
Published in print: Apr 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Jun 27, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mejia A. Guillermo [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Universidad Industrial de Santander–Colombia, Carrera 27, Calle 9 Bucaramanga, Colombia; and Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alabama, P.O. Box 870205, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0205. E-mail: [email protected]
M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Del E. Webb School of Construction, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287-0204 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Susana C. Acevedo [email protected]
M.S. Student, Dept. of Construction, Georgia Institute of Technology, 247 4th St. NW, Suite 351, Atlanta, GA 30332-0155. E-mail: [email protected]
Tulia E. Rivera [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mathematics, Universidad Industrial de Santander–Colombia, Carrera 27, Calle 9 Bucaramanga, Colombia. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share