Application of Fuzzy Concepts to the Visual Assessment of Deteriorating Reinforced Concrete Structures
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138, Issue 3
Abstract
Data obtained using visual inspection are qualitative and subjective in nature. Reported methodology utilizes fuzzy sets for modeling qualitative data. Characteristic distress manifestations corresponding to various deterioration mechanisms in RC structures and associated repair priorities (conditions) are first classified. To deal with the subjective nature of associated data, independent responses on applicable repair priorities for different distress manifestations are obtained from experts through questionnaire survey. Data obtained from questionnaire responses are subsequently used for the development of corresponding fuzzy membership functions (MFs). Visual-inspection data for various characteristic distress manifestations (on the basis of deterioration mechanism) are recorded individually for every deteriorating element of the structure as per the prepared guidelines. Recorded data are used for the selection of corresponding MFs. Selected MFs are combined according to the proposed fuzzy rule using vertex method to obtain the element MFs individually for all specific deteriorations and for collective effect of all the deteriorations. Defuzzification using area-centroid method provides condition indices. These indices provide quantified measure of condition and repair needs of the elements. Element indices are further aggregated to obtain the indices for the structure as a whole. To explain the developed methodology, a brief case study on the assessment of a section of an industrial building is illustrated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways (MOST) India for partial funding of this research work. The authors are also thankful to Dr. K. N. Jha (Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi) for the extended support, and the involved experts for providing the questionnaire responses.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 201. (2008). “Guide for conducting a visual inspection of concrete in service.” ACI 201.1R-08, Farmington Hills, MI.
Arliansyah, J., Maruyama, T., and Takahashi, O. (2003). “A development of fuzzy pavement condition assessment.” Proc., JSCE, 61(746), 275–285.
Blockley, D. I. (1975). “Predicting the likelihood of structural accidents.” Proc., Institute of Civil Engineers, Part 2, Vol. 59(4), London, 659–668.
Blockley, D. I. (1977). “Analysis of structural failures.” Proc., Institute of Civil Engineers, Part 1, Vol. 62(1), London, 51–74.
Brown, C. B., and Yao, J. T. P. (1983). “Fuzzy sets and structural engineering.” ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 109(5), 1211–1225.
Bungey, J. H., and Millard, S. G. (1996). Testing of concrete in structures, 3rd Ed., Blackie Academic & Professional, Glasgow, Scotland.
Chen, M. (2009). “A fuzzy evaluation approach for bridge based on domain knowledge.” Proc., Int. Asia Conf. on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (CAR 2009), IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 269–272.
Central Public Works Department (CPWD). (2002). Handbook on repair and rehabilitation of RCC buildings, CPWD, Govt. of India, New Delhi, India.
Dong, W., and Shah, H. C. (1987). “Vertex method for computing functions of fuzzy variables.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 24(1), 65–78.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (1995). “Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation's bridges.” Rep. No.: FHWA-PD-96-001, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Furuta, H., Hirokane, M., Tanaka, S., and Mikumo, Y. (2000). “A study of technology for diagnosing bridge soundness by using portable computer.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, ASCE, Stanford, CA, 1037–1044.
Fwa, T. F., Liu, S. B., and Teng, K. J. (2003). “Airport pavement condition rating and maintenance-needs assessment using fuzzy logic.” Proc., Airfield Pavements: Challenges and New Technologies, ASCE, Reston, VA, 29–38.
Hadipriono, F. C. (1988). “Fuzzy set concepts for evaluating performance of constructed facilities.” ASCE J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 2(4), 209–225.
Hathout, I. (1993). “Damage assessment of existing transmission towers using fuzzy weighted averages.” Proc., Second Int. Symp. on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, IEEE Computer SocietyLos Alamitos, CA, 573–580.
Kawamura, K., and Miyamoto, A. (2003). “Condition state evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges using neuro-fuzzy hybrid system.” Comput. Struct., 81(18–19), 1931–1940.
Kim, Y. M., Kim, C. K., and Hong, S. G. (2006). “Fuzzy based state assessment for reinforced concrete building structures.” Eng. Struct., 28(9), 1286–1297.
Liang, M. T., Wu, J. H., and Liang, C. H. (2001). “Multiple layer fuzzy evaluation for existing reinforced concrete bridges.” ASCE J. Infrastruct. Syst., 7(4), 144–159.
Mitra, G., Jain, K. K., and Bhattacharjee, B. (2010). “Condition assessment of corrosion-distressed reinforced concrete buildings using fuzzy logic.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 24(6), 562–570.
Ogawa, H., Fu, K. S., and Yao, J. T. P. (1984). “An expert system for structure damage assessment.” Pattern Recognit. Lett., 2(6), 427–432.
Pushpakar, D., and Barai, S. V. (2007). “Fuzzy logic based bridge management system for handheld devices.” Proc., Second Int. Conf. on Industrial and Information Systems, ICIIS 2007, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ.
Ross, T. J., Sorensen, H. C., Savage, S. J., and Carson, J. M. (1990). “DAPS: Expert system for structural damage assessment.” ASCE J. Comput. Civil Eng., 4(4), 327–348.
Sasmal, S., and Ramanjaneyulu, K. (2008). “Condition evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges using fuzzy based analytic hierarchy approach.” Expert Syst. Appl., 35(3), 1430–1443.
Sasmal, S., Ramanjaneyulu, K., Gopalakrishnan, S., and Lakshmanan, N. (2006). “Fuzzy logic based condition rating of existing reinforced concrete bridges.” ASCE J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 20(3), 261–273.
Savage, S. J., Ross, T., Sorensen, H., Carson, J., and Satterthwaite, B. (1988). “Development of a rule-based structural damage assessment code.” AFWL-TR-87-19, Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, NM.
Souflis, C., and Grivas, D. A. (1986). “Fuzzy set approach to linguistic seismic load and damage assessments.” ASCE J. Eng. Mech., 112(6), 605–618.
Wang, Y. M., and Elhag, T. M. S. (2007). “A fuzzy group decision making approach for bridge risk assessment.” Comput. Ind. Eng., 53(1), 137–148.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Controls, 8(3), 338–353.
Zhao, Z., and Chen, C. (2001). “Concrete bridge deterioration diagnosis using fuzzy inference system.” Adv. Eng. Software, 32(4), 317–325.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138 • Issue 3 • March 2012
Pages: 399 - 408
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 13, 2010
Accepted: Jun 10, 2011
Published online: Jun 14, 2011
Published in print: Mar 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.