Inter- and Intraorganizational Trust in International Construction Joint Ventures
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 3
Abstract
International joint ventures in construction often face a highly complex and dynamic environment because, in most instances, they are formed to build large-scale engineering projects. One can distinguish two organizational levels that together constitute the joint venture system: (1) the interorganizational level formed by the partners and (2) the intraorganizational level of the joint venture. The partners seek to reconcile their different interests on the interorganizational level, as each of them follows the goal of profit optimization. Here, formal control mechanisms are more important than trust. Actors on the intraorganizational level face the construction task. One of the primary requirements is to reduce the project complexity. Within the joint venture, many international construction joint ventures disentangle their responsibilities by functional separation and delegation of work. In a social group, delegation of work requires trust in the capability and willingness of others to perform their duties without supervision. Especially during the initial phase, international construction joint ventures are high-pressure environments without established teams. Trust is a mechanism that allows to reach goals efficiently within this setting. As a consequence, we can find a special form of trust in international construction joint ventures: necessitated general trust that is extended to everyone even without prior knowledge. These findings are new and have high practical relevance as trust proves to be a most important success factor.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
We thank all the unnamed interviewees, who answered our sometimes probing questions with unrelenting openness and trust. They made us understand how they see it.
References
Axelrod, R., and Keohane, R. O. (1986). “Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions.” Cooperation under anarchy, K. A. Oye, ed., Princeton University, Princeton, N.J., 226–254.
Badger, W., and Mulligan, D. (1995). “Rationale and benefits associated with international alliances.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(1), 100–111.
Contractor, F. J., and Lorange, P. (2002). Cooperative strategies in international business: Joint ventures and technology partnerships between firms, Pergamon Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). “Building theories from case study research.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 14(4), 532–550.
Fryxell, E. G., Dooley, R. S., and Vryza, M. (2002). “After the ink dries: The interaction of trust and control in US-based international joint ventures.” J. Manage. Stud. (Oxford), 39(6), 865–886.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust, Free Press, New York.
Hassan, T. M., McCaffer, R., and Thorpe, T. (1999). “Emerging clients’ needs for large scale engineering projects.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 6(1), 21–29.
Hinze, J. (1993). Construction contracts, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hofstede, G. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Jalava, J. (2003). “From norms to trust: The Luhmannian connections between trust and systems.” Eur. J. Soc. Theory, 6(2), 173–190.
Kramer, R. M. (1999). “Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions.” American Review of Psychology., 50(1), 569–598.
Kramer, R. M., and Cook, K. S. (2004). Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches, R. M. Kramer and K. S. Cook, eds., Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Lane, C., and Bachmann, R. (1998). Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications, C. Lane and R. Bachmann, eds., Oxford University Press, New York.
Lewis, J. (2002). Cultural studies: The basics, Sage, London.
Luce, R. D., and Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions, Wiley, New York.
Luhmann, N. (1968). Vertrauen, Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart, Germany.
Luhmann, N. (2004). Einführung in die Systemtheorie, 2nd Ed., Carl-Auer-Systeme, Heidelberg, Germany.
March, J. G. (1994). A primer on decision making, Free Press, New York.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D. (1995). “An integrative model of organizational trust.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 20(3), 709–734.
Mintzberg, H. (1992). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Morrow, J. L., Hansen, M. H., and Pearson, A. W. (2004). “The cognitive and affective antecedents of general trust within cooperative organizations.” J. Manage. Issue, 16(1), 48–64.
Nooteboom, B., and Six, F. (2003). The trust process in organizations, B. Nooteboom and F. Six, eds., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, England.
Parsons, T. (1962). Societies: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Parsons, T. (1978). Action theory and the human condition, Free Press, New York.
Petermann, F. (1985). Psychologie des Vertrauens, Müller, Salzburg, Austria.
Robson, M. J., Leonidou, L. C., and Katsikeas, C. S. (2002). “Factors influencing international joint venture performance: Theoretical perspectives, assessment, and future directions.” Manage. Int. Rev., 42(4), 385–418.
Shapiro, S. P. (1987). “The social control of impersonal trust.” Am. J. Sociol., 93(3), 623–658.
Smyth, H. (2000). Marketing and selling construction services, Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview, Wadsworth Group, Belmont, Calif.
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd Ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences, Free Press, New York.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism, Free Press, New York.
Williamson, O. E. (1993). “Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization.” J. Law Econom., 36(S1), 453–486.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 22, 2008
Accepted: Aug 24, 2009
Published online: Aug 26, 2009
Published in print: Mar 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.