Probabilistic Approach for Budgeting in Portfolio of Projects
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper presents a mathematical model for calculating the budgetary impact of increasing the required confidence level in a probabilistic risk assessment for a portfolio of projects. The model provides a rational approach for establishing a probabilistic budget for an individual project in such a way that the budget for a portfolio of projects will meet a required confidence level. The use of probabilistic risk assessment in major infrastructure projects is increasing to cope with major cost overruns and schedule delays. The outcome of the probabilistic risk assessment is often a distribution for project costs. The question is at what level of confidence (i.e., the probability that budget would be sufficient given the cost distribution) should be used for establishing the budget. The proposed method looks at a portfolio of such projects being funded by the same owner. The owner can establish a target probability with respect to its annual budget. The model can help the owner establish confidence level for individual projects and also examine the effect of changing the confidence level of the portfolio budget on the budget and the confidence level of individual projects. The paper is relevant to practitioners because it provides a methodology for establishing confidence levels by the owner agencies in the emerging field of cost risk assessment for infrastructure projects. A numerical example is provided using actual transit project data to demonstrate the model application.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Booz Allen & Hamilton. (2005). “Managing capital costs of major federally funded public transportation projects.” TCRP web-only document 31 (project G-7), TRB, Washington, D.C.
Dantata, N., Touran, A., and Schneck, D. (2006). “Trends in U.S. Rail Transit projects cost overrun.” Proc., TRB 2006, TRB, Washington, D.C.
Faulkner, B., and El-Sharafi, M. (2003). “From rehab to first class: Analyzing the increase in costs of the Old Colony Commuter Railroad Project.” Proc., TRB Annual Meeting, TRB, Washington, D.C.
Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. S., and Buhl, S. (2002). “Underestimating costs in public works projects.” J. Am. Plan. Assn., 68(3), 279–295.
Moder, J. J., Phillips, C. R., and Davis, E. W. (1983). Project management with CPM, PERT and precedence diagramming, 3rd Ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Molenaar, K. R. (2005). “Programmatic cost risk analysis for highway mega-projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(3), 343–353.
Parsons, Inc., Touran, A., and Golder Associates. (2004). “Risk assessment methodologies and procedures.” A white paper prepared for Federal Transit Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C.
Pickrell, D. H. (1990). “Urban rail transit projects: Forecast versus actual ridership and cost.” DOT-T-91–04, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Reilly, J., McBride, M., Sangrey, D., MacDonald, D., and Brown, J. (2004). “The development of a new cost-risk estimating process for transportation infrastructure projects.” Civil engineering practice, Boston Society of Civil Engineers, Boston, 53–75.
Touran, A. (2006). “A mathematical model for establishing budget levels for a portfolio of transit projects.” Proc., ICCCBE XI, ICCCBE, Montreal.
Wardeman, S. B., and Jobe, J. M. (2001). Basic engineering data collection and analysis, Duxbury, Pacific Grove, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 15, 2008
Accepted: Aug 7, 2009
Published online: Aug 10, 2009
Published in print: Mar 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.