Monte Carlo Simulation Approach to Support Alliance Team Selection
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135, Issue 10
Abstract
The alliance concept is similar to the design build project delivery system. However, it is denoted by a special form of partnership between the owner and the design-build team, where the owner is very involved in the project. This type of delivery systems is gaining popularity as many infrastructure projects require the owner to order materials ahead of time, before engaging the design-build team in the project. As in design-build, the selection of the engineer-procure-construct team depends not only on the price but also on qualitative factors. This paper lays out the framework that facilitates selecting the best alliance team for a project by quantifying the evaluation factors and combining them into a single score. Using a Monte Carlo simulation and varying all the factors relevant to the decision problem can reveal biases present in the evaluation to assist in making the best possible decision. A case study dealing with a large utility project illustrates this methodology.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers thank Gary Whited, P.E., and the University of Wisconsin-Madison CEE 698–004 Spring 08 class for providing useful critique and advice while the paper was being developed.
References
Abi-Karam, T. (2005). “Design/build selection process—Art or science.” Cost Eng., 47(5), 14–19.
Alsugair, A. M. (1999). “Framework for evaluating bids of construction contractors.” J. Manage. Eng., 15(2), 72–78.
Back, W. E., and Bell, L. C. (1995). “Monte Carlo simulation as tool for process reengineering.” J. Manage. Eng., 11(5), 46–53.
Baxendale, T. (1984). “Construction resource models by Monte Carlo simulation.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 2(3), 201–217.
El Wardani, M. A., Messner, J. I., and Horman, M. J. (2005). “Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(3), 230–238.
Konchar, M., and Sanvido, V. (1998). “Comparison of US project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(6), 435–444.
McCabe, B. (2003). “Monte Carlo simulation for schedule risks.” Proc., 2003 Winter Simulation Conf., New Orleans.
Molenaar, K. R., and Johnson, D. E. (2003). “Engineering the procurement process to achieve best value.” Leadership Manage. Eng., 3(3), 137–141.
Molenaar, K. R., and Yakowenko, G. (2007). Alternative project delivery, procurement, and contracting methods for highways, Construction Institute, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Palaneeswaran, E., Kumaraswamy, M., and Ng, T. (2003). “Targeting optimum value in public sector projects through ‘best value’-focused contractor selection.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 10(6), 418–431.
Palaneeswaran, E., Kumaraswamy, M., and Ng, T. (2000). “Contractor selection for design/build projects.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 126(5), 331–330.
Touran, A., and Lopez, R. (2006). “Modeling cost escalation in large infrastructure projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(8), 853–860.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135 • Issue 10 • October 2009
Pages: 1087 - 1095
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: May 8, 2008
Accepted: Apr 16, 2009
Published online: Apr 17, 2009
Published in print: Oct 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.