Distressed Adjacent Prestressed Concrete Voided Beams at the End of Service
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31, Issue 6
Abstract
Bridge superstructures built with adjacent precast concrete voided members have the advantages of low profiles, faster construction times, no requirement for deck formwork, and the consequent reduction of the duration of workers’ exposure to construction vehicles and traffic. These reasons make this type of construction a preferred design. However, the mechanism that transfers load between adjacent beams often cracks, leading to leakage of salt-laden water runoff between the individual beams and to corrosion of the reinforcement. Two bridges in Virginia provide a contrast in performance: one box beam structure that was highly deteriorated after 31 years of service, and one adjacent voided slab bridge that was in relatively good condition after more than 50 years of service. Researchers conducted both destructive and nondestructive evaluations of beams from these structures, including in situ assessment of the concrete and prestressed reinforcement and sampling of the concrete core. Maintenance practices, concrete quality, and construction quality control appear to be the major factors influencing the conditions of these structures. Recommendations are provided to help prevent premature deterioration in future designs using adjacent precast concrete voided members.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to recognize Rick Childs, who prepared all the powdered samples from the concrete cores extracted from the beams, as one of his last duties before retirement. Other personnel associated with the material analysis include Linda DeGrasse, Lewis Lloyd, Evelina Khakimova, Nick Goddeau, and Gundars Buka. Finally, thanks goes out to Gary Martin, Robert Dunn, and Brad Jones of the Richmond district, and Bobby Fair and the VDOT Manassas maintenance staff of the NoVA district for their cooperation and coordination for the sampling and testing of the two bridges in this project.
References
ASTM. (2012a). “Standard test method for acid-soluble chloride in mortar and concrete.” ASTM C1152, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2012b). “Standard test method for electrical indication of concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion penetration.” ASTM C1202, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2013). “Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete.” ASTM C642, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2014). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” ASTM C39, West Conshohocken, PA.
Balakumaran, S. S. G. (2012). “Corrosion testing and modeling of chloride-induced corrosion deterioration of concrete bridge decks.” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Balakumaran, S. S. G., and Weyers, R. E. (2014). “Influence of stay-in-place forms on concrete bridge deck corrosion.” ACI Mater. J., 111(5), 475–482.
Balakumaran, S. S. G., Weyers, R. E., and Brown, M. C. (2013). “Modeling corrosion effects: An examination of chloride-induced deterioration of a bridge deck with epoxy-coated reinforcement.” Concr. Int., 35(2), 47–53.
Huckelbridge, A. A., and El-Esnawi, H. H. (1997). “Evaluation of improved shear key designs for multi-beam box girder bridges.”, National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, VA.
Miller, R. A., Hlavacs, G. M., and Long, T. (1999). “Full-scale testing of shear keys for adjacent box girder bridges.” PCI J., 44(6), 80–90.
Naito, C., Sause, R., Hodgson, I., Pessiki, S., and Macioce, T. (2010). “Forensic examination of a noncomposite adjacent precast prestressed concrete box beam bridge.” J. Bridge Eng., 408–418.
Russell, H. G. (2009). “Adjacent precast concrete box beam bridges: Connection details.”, Transportation Research Board National Research Council, Washington, DC.
VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation), “Bridge inspection report.” (2012)., Prince William County, VA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 25, 2016
Accepted: May 5, 2017
Published online: Jul 29, 2017
Published in print: Dec 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Dec 29, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.