Technical Notes
Aug 27, 2014

Comparison of Housing Facility Management between Mainland China and Taiwan Region

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29, Issue 4

Abstract

Recently, mainland China has experienced the fastest urbanization in the world; however, the development of structural regulations regarding facility management (FM) services for housing is relatively recessive. As a result, disputes and conflicts in facility management of the private housing sector have become a serious problem in urban communities, affecting social sustainable development of the building industry. Comparatively, the private housing FM system in the urban areas in the Taiwan region was developed much earlier; thus, it is more advanced and mature than that in mainland China. This paper intends to compare the FM sectors between the two regions to provide suggestions for improving the service quality of the FM system in mainland China.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research is sponsored by: Natural Science Foundation of Shandong (Grant No. ZR2013GQ014); Independent Innovation Foundation of Shandong University (Grant No. IFW12108; IFW12065).

References

Apartment and Mansion Management Regulations. (1995). “Presidential office.”, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen, J., and Sun, J. (2008). “The pro and con of applying self-operated facility management in old residential community.” China Facil. Manage., 1, 28–29 (in Chinese).
Chen, S. (2006). “Initial analysis: The fact of difficulty in collecting facility management fees.” China Electricity Education, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
Facility Management Regulations. (2007). “State council of PRC.”, The State Council of PRC, Beijing, China.
Facility Service Charging Management Means. (2003). “The national development and reform commission of PRC and the ministry of construction of PRC.”.
Fu, C. (1999). “Introduction of self-operated facility management system in Taiwan.” China Real Estate, 10, 279 (in Chinese).
Hu, X., Wang, F., and Cheng, X. (2008). “Game theory analysis on difficulty in collecting facility management fees.” Modern Finance, 7(1), 105–114 (in Chinese).
Huang, S. (2007). Explanation and implication of the property law of the People’s Republic of China, People’s Court Press, Beijing, China.
Hui, E. C. M., and Zheng, X. (2010). “Measuring customer satisfaction of FM service in housing sector: A structural equation model approach.” Facilities, 28(5–6), 306–320.
Lai, J. H. K. (2010). “Investigating the quality of FM services in residential buildings.” Proc., W070-Special Track, 18th CIBWorld Building Congress, International Council for Building, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 13–25.
Lai, J. H. K. (2011). “Comparative evaluation of facility management services for housing estates.” Habitat Int., 35(2), 391–397.
Li, Y. (2005). “The study on the legal issues in facility management.” Ph.D. thesis, China Zhengfa Univ., Beijing, China (in Chinese).
Liang, J., and Gao, P. (2003). “Property management to achieve a two-track system in line with national conditions.” China Lawyer, 5, 70–71 (in Chinese).
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2009). “Living standard of citizens.” Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China, 〈http://www.gov.cn〉 (Oct. 11, 2013) (in Chinese).
Pan, L. (2011). “A legislation study of the condominium ownership mandatory deprivation issue.” People’s Court in Kaifeng Network, 〈http://fayuan.kaiping.gov.cn/article.asp?id=1511〉 (Oct. 11, 2013).
Property Law of the PRC. (2007). “The state council of PRC.”, Beijing, China.
Special Fund Management Measure of House Maintenance. (2007). “Ministry of construction of the PRC and Ministry of Finance of the PRC.”, Ministry of construction of the PRC and Ministry of Finance of the PRC, Beijing, China.
Ukoha, O., and Beamish, J. O. (1997). “Assessment of residents’ satisfaction with public housing in Abuja, Nigeria.” Habitat Int., 21(4), 445–460.
Wang, D. (2008). “Study on difficulty in collecting facility management fees.” Economist, 7 (in Chinese).
Wang, E. (2011). “Only 3% usage on the 13billion commercial residential special maintenance funds.” 〈http://finance.qq.com/a/20071031/002708.htm〉 (Oct. 11, 2013).
Wang, N., and Horner, M. (2012). “Is privatization the answer for social housing?” Comp. Study China U.K., Housing Soc., 39(1), 99–124.
Zhang, H. (2006). “Reconsidering the problem in collecting facility management fees.” Univ. Time, 10 (in Chinese).
Zhang, J. (2008). “A shallow discussion on the difficulty in collecting facility management fees.” China Technol. Inf., 23, 154–155. (in Chinese).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29Issue 4August 2015

History

Received: Mar 13, 2014
Accepted: Jul 18, 2014
Published online: Aug 27, 2014
Discussion open until: Jan 27, 2015
Published in print: Aug 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nannan Wang [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Management, Shandong Univ., Jinan, Shandong 250100, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Yen-Chiang Chang [email protected]
Professor, School of Law, Shandong Univ., Jinan, Shandong 250100,China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
School of Law, Shandong Univ., Shandong 250100, China. E-mail: [email protected]
School of Management, Shandong Univ., Jinan, Shandong 250100, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Dongdong Jiang
Graduate School of Technology Management, Univ. of Pretoria, Private bag X20 Hatfield, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share