Modal Parameter Variations due to Joist Bottom Chord Extension Installations on Laboratory Footbridges
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29, Issue 5
Abstract
For steel-framed structural systems, strength and deflections have been the two fundamental limit states for the design. However, the use of high-strength steel, lighter sections, and low inherent damping resulted in more lively structures, and floor vibration serviceability has become a governing factor for structural design. While annoying floor vibrations can be significant in open web steel joist-supported footbridges; a common application in the North American construction industry is the installation of bottom chord extensions in an attempt to strengthen the floor and increase the natural frequency of the floor systems. Even though extending joist bottom chords is very common, there has not been any publication on the topic studying the dynamic effects of this application. The study presented in this paper aims to fill this gap and identify the effect of bottom chord extensions on the modal parameters of joist-supported structures, by studying two laboratory footbridges. The goal is not to solve a potential vibration problem of a footbridge but to identify the modal parameter variations due to bottom chord extension installations. Extensive experimental and analytical studies were conducted on single-span and three-span joist-supported laboratory footbridges with different bottom chord extension configurations. Three-dimensional finite-element computer models were created to simulate and compare the results of stiffness and dynamic tests with the philosophy of testing the footbridges and updating the finite-element models, thus minimizing the discrepancies between the test results and the finite-element models for better prediction. Results from the static and dynamic tests on the single-span and three-span footbridges indicate that installing the bottom chord extensions to the joists increases the natural frequencies of the flexural stiffness and flexural bending. Considering the low cost, and quick and easy application at the construction site, extending bottom chords can be considered as an option to reduce the deflections and increase the governing bending mode natural frequencies of footbridges. While bottom chord extensions do not guarantee that the vibration problem (if any) would be solved, with the higher natural frequencies, the footbridges are relatively less vulnerable to be put in resonance by human induced excitations. As a result, extending bottom chord extensions is an advantage; however, the acceleration response of the footbridges needs to be checked separately, for conformance with the code limits.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank NUCOR Research and Development for funding the research reported here and the staff of Thomas M. Murray Structural Engineering Laboratory at Virginia Tech for their assistance with construction of the footbridges and the physical testing. The author would also like to thank Prof. Thomas M. Murray and Prof. Mehdi Setareh for their valuable guidance.
References
APS Dynamics. Instruction manual: Electro-seis model 400 shaker.
Allemang, R. J. (2003). “The modal assurance criterion—Twenty years of use and abuse.” Sound Vib., 37(8), 14–23.
Avci, O. (2005). “Effects of bottom chord extensions on the static and dynamic performance of steel joist-supported floors.” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.
Avci, O., and Murray, T. M. (2012). “Effect of bottom chord extensions on the static flexural stiffness of open-web steel joists.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 620–632.
Avitabile, P. (2006). “MODAL SPACE: What is a good MAC value so that i know my model is right?” Exp. Tech., 30, 17–18.
Barrett, A., Avci, O., Setareh, M., and Murray, T. (2006). “Observations from vibration testing of in-situ structures.” Structures Congress 2006, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–10.
Bracewell, R. N. (2000). The Fourier transform and its applications, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Broekemeier, M. W., and Fisher, J. M. (2007). “Evaluation and modification of open-web steel joists and joist girders.” Proc., North American Steel Construction Conf., Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY.
Computers and Structures (CSI). (2002). SAP2000 linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis and design of three-dimensional structures- user's manuals, Berkeley, CA.
Ewins, D. J. (2000). Modal testing: Theory, practice, and application, 2nd Ed., Research Studies Press, Baldock, U.K.
Fisher, J. M. (2005). “Strengthening open-web steel joists.” Eng. J., 247–259.
Fisher, J. M., West, M. A., and Van De Pas, J. (1991). Designing with steel joists, joist girders and steel deck, Vulcraft, Norfolk, NE.
Inman, D. J. (2000). Engineering vibration, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Murray, T. M., Allen, D. E., and Ungar, E. E. (1997). Steel design guide series 11: Floor vibrations due to human activity, AISC, Chicago.
Vibrant Technology. (2003). ME’ScopeVES online help, Scotts Valley, CA.
Vulcraft. (2008). Steel roof and floor deck catalog, Norfolk, NE.
Živanović, S., Pavic, A., and Reynolds, P. (2005). “Vibration serviceability of footbridges under human-induced excitation: A literature review.” J. Sound Vib., 279(1–2), 1–74.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 4, 2014
Accepted: May 27, 2014
Published online: Sep 15, 2014
Discussion open until: Feb 15, 2015
Published in print: Oct 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.