Effectively Responding to Structural Engineering Failure: Expertise and Cognitive Entrenchment
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 28, Issue 5
Abstract
Forensic structural engineering plays a critical role in identifying the cause of failure, providing advice in the immediate aftermath of catastrophic failures, and in some cases providing expert opinion in the event of legal disputes. Although many authors have addressed the challenges involved in training the next generation of forensic engineers and further developing the specialty of forensics, this paper examines how the fundamental nature of an engineer’s existing expertise can lead to cognitive entrenchment, and limit an investigator’s ability to respond to failure effectively. The paper argues that an experienced engineer’s design expertise must be substituted with forensic expertise to effectively investigate and respond to failure. The paper concludes by arguing that knowledge of, and experience in, the implementation of the scientific method should become a critical focus for experienced engineers wishing to make the transition to forensic investigation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bell, G. R. (2000b). “Civil engineering investigation.” Chapter 8, Forensic engineering, 2nd Ed., K. L. Carper, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 232.
Bell, G. R. (2000a). “Engineering investigation of structural failures.” Chapter 6, Forensic structural engineering handbook, R. T. Ratay, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Brady, S. (2012). “Role of the forensic process in investigating structural failure.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 2–6.
Carper, K. L., ed. (2000). Forensic engineering, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 6–7.
Dane, E. (2010). “Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 35(4), 579.
DeWitt, W., Geddes, L., Johnson, F., and Reader, L. (2001). “A master of science curriculum in forensic engineering.” 31th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., Vol. 2.
Lewis, G. L., ed. (2003). Guidelines for forensic engineering practice, ASCE, Reston, VA, 25.
Macquarie Library Pty Ltd. (2006). Macquarie concise dictionary, 4th Ed., The Macquarie Library, North Ryde, NSW, 1446.
Parfitt, M. (2006). “Learning from failure: Teaching a course on building performance and forensic techniques.” Forensic Engineering (2006), ASCE, Reston, VA, 353–363.
Prevatt, D. (2010). “On the job versus graduate school training of forensic engineers—An instructor and professional engineer’s view.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 78–86.
Rad, F., and James, A. (2006). “Learning from the past experiences of practicing engineers.” Forensic Engineering (2006), ASCE, Reston, VA, 12–21.
Ratay, R. T., ed., (2010). Forensic structural engineering handbook, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ratcliffe, S. (2011). Oxford treasury of sayings and quotations, 4th Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Rens, K., Rendon-Herrero, O., and Clark, M. (2000). “Failure of constructed facilities in civil engineering curricula.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 27–37.
Salyards, K. (2011). “Lessons learned through the development of an undergraduate course on civil engineering failures.” Structures Congress 2011, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1108–1117.
Wiley, J. (1998). “Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving.” Memory Cognit., 26(4), 716–730.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 17, 2012
Accepted: Mar 11, 2013
Published online: Mar 13, 2013
Published in print: Oct 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.