Technical Papers
Jul 21, 2022

Calibration of a Cyclic Cohesive-Zone Model for Fatigue-Crack Propagation in CFRP-Strengthened Steel Plates

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26, Issue 5

Abstract

Various carbon fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP) strengthening systems have been developed to increase the fatigue lifetime of existing aging steel structures. According to the literature, the results of fatigue tests on CFRP-strengthened steel plates showed a significant increase in the fatigue lifetime of the specimens, compared with the bare ones. In particular, the fatigue lifetime extension was more pronounced for short initial crack sizes (i.e., low initial damage level). In this study, the fatigue-crack growth curves in bonded CFRP-strengthened single edge notched tension (SENT) specimens were numerically investigated. The proposed numerical approach adopted a cyclic cohesive-zone model (CCZM), which enabled the simulation of crack growth in steel plates, through the definition of a scalar damage variable (k). The selected model contained some parameters that did not possess a precise physical meaning and therefore were not amenable to direct measurement. Therefore, a robust identification procedure was proposed to calibrate the model parameters that governed fatigue behavior, which was based on the response of unstrengthened specimens in the crack propagation curves. The successful identification was then validated by comparison with the measured response of the strengthened SENT specimens, which were modeled by adopting the same identified model parameters. The adhesive between the CFRP laminate and steel substrate was simulated by defining an elasto–brittle surface-to-surface contact model, whose properties were selected based on well known approaches that were proposed in the literature.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research grant provided by Fondazione Fratelli Confalonieri to the first author is acknowledged.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
ac
computed crack length;
ae
experimentally measured crack length;
Gf
fracture energy;
i
index denoting a given cycle of the loading history;
k
damage variable;
N
number of cycles in the loading history;
p
vector of model parameters to be estimated;
T
scalar effective cohesive traction;
t
traction vector at the interface;
tn
normal traction component;
ts
shear traction component;
α
parameter of the CCZM that governs damage evaluation during the reloading phase;
β
parameter of the CCZM that governs the fatigue threshold;
δ
scalar effective opening displacement;
δ
separation vector at the interface;
δc
critical displacement at which crack initiates;
δn
normal component of the discontinuity displacement vector along the interface;
δs
shear component of the discontinuity displacement vector along the interface;
δu
failure displacement of the cohesive law;
γ
parameter of the CCZM governing damage evaluation during the unloading phase;
η
nondimensional parameter that governs mixed-mode
Θ
discrepancy function in the parameter’s evaluation process; and
σc
peak traction of the cohesive law.

References

Abaqus. 2014. ABAQUS version 6.14. Vélizy-Villacoublay, France: Dassault Systemes.
Anderson, T. L. 2017. Fracture mechanics: Fundamentals and applications. 4th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Baktheer, A., and R. Chudoba. 2018. “Pressure-sensitive bond fatigue model with damage evolution driven by cumulative slip: Thermodynamic formulation and applications to steel- and FRP-concrete bond.” Int. J. Fatigue 113: 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.04.020.
Bocciarelli, M. 2021. “A new cohesive law for the simulation of crack propagation under cyclic loading. Application to steel- and concrete-FRP bonded interface.” Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 114: 102992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102992.
Bocciarelli, M., V. Buljak, C. K. S. Moy, S. P. Ringer, and G. Ranzi. 2014. “An inverse analysis approach based on a POD direct model for the mechanical characterization of metallic materials.” Comput. Mater. Sci 95: 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.025.
Bocciarelli, M., P. Colombi, T. D’Antino, and G. Fava. 2018. “Intermediate crack induced debonding in steel beams reinforced with CFRP plates under fatigue loading.” Eng. Struct. 171: 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.002.
Bocciarelli, M., and G. Ranzi. 2018. “An inverse analysis approach for the identification of the hygro-thermo-chemical model parameters of concrete.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 138–139: 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.01.035.
Bui, H. D. 1994. Inverse problems in the mechanics of materials: An introduction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Carrara, P., and L. De Lorenzis. 2015. “A coupled damage-plasticity model for the cyclic behavior of shear-loaded interfaces.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 85: 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.09.002.
Coleman, T. F., and Y. Li. 1996. “An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds.” SIAM J. Optim. 6 (2): 418–445. https://doi.org/10.1137/0806023.
Colombi, P., and G. Fava. 2016. “Fatigue crack growth in steel beams strengthened by CFRP strips.” Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 85: 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2016.01.007.
Colombi, P., G. Fava, and L. Sonzogni. 2015. “Fatigue crack growth in CFRP-strengthened steel plates.” Composites, Part B 72: 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.036.
García-Collado, A., J. M. Vasco-Olmo, and F. A. Díaz. 2017. “Numerical analysis of plasticity induced crack closure based on an irreversible cohesive zone model.” Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 89: 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.01.006.
Ghafoori, E., and M. Motavalli. 2015. “Innovative CFRP-prestressing system for strengthening metallic structures.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (6): 04015006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000559.
Hosseini, A., E. Ghafoori, R. Al-Mahaidi, X. L. Zhao, and M. Motavalli. 2019. “Strengthening of a 19th-century roadway metallic bridge using nonprestressed bonded and prestressed unbonded CFRP plates.” Constr. Build. Mater. 209: 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.095.
Huang, C., T. Chen, and S. Feng. 2019. “Finite element analysis of fatigue crack growth in CFRP-repaired four-point bend specimens.” Eng. Struct. 183 (15): 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.045.
Huawen, Y., C. König, T. Ummenhofer, Q. Shizhong, and R. Plum. 2010. “Fatigue performance of tension steel plates strengthened with prestressed CFRP laminates.” J. Compos. Constr. 14 (5): 609–615. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000111.
Kamruzzaman, M., M. Z. Jumaat, N. H. Ramli Sulong, and A. B. M. Saiful Islam. 2014. “A review on strengthening steel beams using FRP under fatigue.” Sci. World J. 2014: 702537. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/702537.
Liu, H., Z. Xiao, X. L. Zhao, and R. Al-Mahaidi. 2009. “Prediction of fatigue life for CFRP-strengthened steel plates.” Thin-Walled Struct. 47 (10): 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2008.10.011.
MathWorks. 2004. User’s guide and optimization toolbox. Release 6.13, Matlab. Natick, MA: MathWorks.
Matta, F., V. Karbhari, and R. Vitaliani. 2005. “Tensile response of steel/CFRP adhesive bonds for the rehabilitation of civil structures.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 20 (5): 589–608. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.20.5.589.
Matta, F., P. Rizzo, V. Karbhari, and F. Lanza di Scalea. 2006. “Acoustic emission damage assessment of steel/CFRP bonds for rehabilitation.” J. Compos. Constr. 10 (3): 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:3(265).
Mohajer, M., M. Bocciarelli, P. Colombi, A. Hosseini, A. Nussbaumer, and E. Ghafoori. 2020. “Irreversible cyclic cohesive zone model for prediction of mode I fatigue crack growth in CFRP-strengthened steel plates.” Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 110: 102804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102804.
Mroz, Z., and G. E. Stavroulakis. 2005. Vol. 469 of Identification of materials and structures. CISM Lecture Notes. Wien: Springer.
Nguyen, O., E. A. Repetto, M. Ortiz, and R. A. Radovitzky. 2001. “A cohesive model of fatigue crack growth.” Int. J. Fract. 110 (4): 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010839522926.
Roe, K. L., and T. Siegmund. 2003. “An irreversible cohesive zone model for interface fatigue crack growth simulation.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 70 (2): 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00034-6.
Sika Corporation. 2020 “Sikadur® 30 product data sheet.” Accessed May 9, 2022. https://usa.sika.com/en/construction/repair-protection/structural-strengthening/epoxies/sikadur-30.html.
Stavroulakis, G., G. Bolzon, Z. Waszczyszyn, and L. Ziemianski. 2003. “Inverse analysis.” In Comprehensive structural integrity, edited by B. Karihaloo, R. O. Ritchie, and I. Milne. Kidlington (Oxfordshire), UK: Elsevier.
Tavakkolizadeh, M., and H. Saadatmanesh. 2003. “Fatigue strength of steel girders strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymer patch.” J. Struct. Eng. 129 (2): 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(186).
Teng, J. G., D. Fernando, and T. Yu. 2015. “Finite element modelling of debonding failures in steel beams flexurally strengthened with CFRP laminates.” Eng. Struct. 86: 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.003.
Ural, A., V. R. Krishnan, and K. D. Papoulia. 2009a. “A cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth allowing for crack retardation.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 46 (11–12): 2453–2462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.031.
Ural, A., V. R. Krishnan, and K. D. Papoulia. 2009b. “Erratum to “A cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth allowing for crack retardation” [International Journal of Solids and Structures 46 (2009) 2453–2462].” Int. J. Solids Struct. 46 (18–19): 3503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.05.005.
Wu, S., and F. Wu. 1991. “Computation of a trust region step.” Acta Math. Appl. Sin. 7 (4): 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02009686.
Zhao, X. L., and L. Zhang. 2007. “State-of-the-art review on FRP strengthened steel structures.” Eng. Struct. 29 (8): 1808–1823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.10.006.
Zheng, B., and M. Dawood. 2016. “Debonding of carbon fiber–reinforced polymer patches from cracked steel elements under fatigue loading.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (6): 04016038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000694.
Zheng, B., and M. Dawood. 2017. “Fatigue crack growth analysis of steel elements reinforced with shape memory alloy (SMA)/fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composite patches.” Compos. Struct. 164 (15): 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.077.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 5October 2022

History

Received: Dec 20, 2021
Accepted: May 13, 2022
Published online: Jul 21, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 21, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0695-0958. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3851-0466. Email: [email protected]
Pierluigi Colombi [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Identification of the parameters contained in a cyclic cohesive zone model for fatigue crack propagation, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109055, 279, (109055), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share