Investigation of Various GFRP Shear Connectors for Insulated Precast Concrete Sandwich Wall Panels
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 17, Issue 5
Abstract
Glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) shear connectors provide much reduced thermal bridging in insulated concrete sandwich panels compared to steel connectors. In this study, 50 specimens with dimensions of representing segments of a precast sandwich wall comprising two concrete wythes and a concrete stud surrounded by insulation foam have been tested in a double-shear configuration. Three types of GFRP connectors produced from available sand-coated and threaded rods were tested and compared to conventional steel and polymer connectors. GFRP connector diameters varied from 6 to 13 mm, and spacing varied from 80 to 300 mm. Both circular and rectangular cross sections were examined, along with various end treatments to compare with simple straight embedment. The shear strength of GFRP connectors, including the effect of friction between concrete and foam, ranged from 60 to 112 MPa, significantly higher than polymer connectors but lower than steel connectors. As the connectors bridged a small gab of insulation between concrete wythe and stud, their shear strength was lower than manufacturer-reported values. Varying the size, spacing, cross-section shape, or end treatment of connectors had insignificant effect on their strength. The connectors failed by longitudinal delamination then transverse shear but did not pull out of the concrete wythe. Adhesion bond between concrete and insulation was quite significant and contributed about 28%, but was quite random and variable. A model was developed to predict the strength of connectors and clearly demonstrated the reduction in strength as thickness of insulation layer increases.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial and in-kind support provided by Anchor Concrete Products Ltd. The authors also wish to acknowledge the Ontario Centres of Excellence (OCE) for funding this project.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2012). “Guide test methods for fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites for reinforcing or strengthening concrete and masonry structures.” ACI 440.3R-12, Indianapolis, IN.
ASTM. (2011). “Standard test method for transverse shear strength of fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite bar.” ASTM-D6717, West Conshohocken, PA.
Benayoune, A., Samad, A. A. A., Abang Ali, A. A., and Trikha, D. N. (2007). “Response of pre-cast reinforced composite sandwich panels to axial loading.” Constr. Build. Mater., 21(3), 677–685.
Benayoune, A., Samad, A. A., Trikha, D. N., Abang Ali, A. A., and Ellinna, S. H. M. (2008). “Flexural behavior of pre-cast concrete sandwich composite panel—Experimental and theoretical investigations.” Constr. Build. Mater., 22(4), 580–592.
Bush, T. D., and Stine, G. L. (1994). “Flexural behavior of composite precast concrete sandwich panels with continuous truss connectors.” PCI J., 39(2), 112–121.
Bush, T. D., and Wu, Z. (1998). “Flexural analysis of prestressed concrete sandwich panels with truss connectors.” PCI J., 43(5), 76–86.
Chen, Y., Davalos, J. F., Ray, I., and Kim, H. Y. (2007). “Accelerated aging tests for evaluations of durability performance of FRP reinforcing bars for concrete structures.” Compos. Struct., 78(1), 101–111.
Chu, W., Wu, L., and Karbhari, V. M. (2004). “Durability evaluation of moderate temperature cured E-glass/vinylester systems.” Compos. Struct., 66(1–4), 367–376.
Creative Pultrusions. (2004). The Pultex® pultrusion design manual of standard and custom fiber reinforced polymer structural profiles, Vol. 4, Creative Pultrusions, Alum Bank, PA.
Eddie, D., Shalaby, A., and Rizkalla, S. (2001). “Glass fiber-reinforced polymer dowels for concrete pavements.” ACI Struct. J., 98(2), 201–206.
Einea, A., Salmon, D. C., Fogarasi, G. J., Culp, T. D., and Tadros, M. K. (1991). “State-of-the-art of precast concrete sandwich panels.” PCI J., 36(6), 78–98.
Einea, A., Salmon, D. C., Tadros, M. K., and Culp, T. (1994). “A new structurally and thermally efficient precast sandwich panel system.” PCI J., 39(4), 90–101.
Gentry, R. (2011). “Transverse shear of GFRP rods: Test method development and potential for durability assessment.” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Durability and stainability of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Construction and Rehabilitation, Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC.
Hassan, T., and Rizkalla, T. (2010). “Analysis and design guidelines of precast, prestressed concrete, composite load-bearing sandwich wall panels reinforced with CFRP grid.” PCI J., 55(2), 147–162.
Holmes, W. W., Kusolthamarat, D., and Tadros, M. K. (2005). “NU Precast Concrete House Provides Spacious and Energy Efficient Solution for Residential Construction.” PCI J., 50(3), 16–25.
Maximos, H. N., Pong, W. A., Tadros, M. L., and Martin, L. D. (2007). “Behavior and design of composite precast prestressed concrete sandwich panels with NU-tie.”, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.
McCall, C. (1985). “Thermal properties of sandwich panels.” Concrete Int., 7(1), 35–41.
Murphy, J. (1994). Reinforced plastics handbook, 1st Ed., Elsevier, New York.
PCI Committee on Precast Concrete Sandwich Panels. (2011). “State of the art of precast/prestressed concrete sandwich wall panels.” PCI J., 56(2), 131–176.
Pessiki, S., and Mlynarczyk, A. (2003). “Experimental evaluation of the composite behavior of precast concrete sandwich wall panels.” PCI J., 48(2), 54–71.
Salmon, D. C., Einea, A., Tadros, M., and Culp, T. D. (1997). “Full scale testing of precast concrete sandwich panels.” ACI Struct. J, 94(4), 354–362.
Shivakumar, K. N., Swaminathan, G., and Sharpe, M. (2006). “Carbon/vinyl ester composites for enhanced performance in marine applications.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 25(10), 1101.
Soriano, J. G., Rizkalla, S. H., You, Y. C., and Kim, J. (2012). “Use of GFRP grid for innovative concrete sandwich panels.” 6th ACUN Conf., Monash Univ., Melbourne, Australia.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 17 • Issue 5 • October 2013
Pages: 711 - 721
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 24, 2012
Accepted: Mar 11, 2013
Published online: Mar 13, 2013
Discussion open until: Aug 13, 2013
Published in print: Oct 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.