Technical Papers
Oct 17, 2012

Longitudinal Bending and Failure of GFRP Pipes Buried in Dense Sand under Relative Ground Movement

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 17, Issue 5

Abstract

Pipelines extend thousands of kilometers for transport and distribution of oil, gas, and other chemical products. With the ever persistent challenges often faced with corrosion, relative rigidity, and other issues characteristic to steel pipes, the need to explore the use of new pipeline materials, such as glass fiber–reinforced polymers (GFRP), increases. The pipe-soil interaction and the longitudinal behavior of such pipes resulting from relative ground movements is poorly understood. In this study, a series of GFRP pipe bending experiments have been conducted on 115-mm-diameter and 1,830-mm-long GFRP pipes buried in dense sand. The pipe ends were pulled by two parallel cables attached to a spreader beam outside the test region, which was pulled by a hydraulic actuator. The study investigated the effect of laminate structure of pipe, including a cross-ply and angle-ply laminates, on the strength, deflections and failure modes, at different burial depth-to-diameter (H/D) ratios of 3, 5, and 7. Results were also compared with steel control pipes of comparable dimensions and pressure rating. The peak load was shown to increase as burial depth increases, and was generally associated with soil failure, except for the angle-ply pipe at H/D=7 that experienced a structural failure. At peak loads, the net deflections of GFRP pipes were 4–7.5 times those of the equivalent steel pipes, with the cross-ply pipes being stiffer than angle-ply pipes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Alexander, C. R., and Francini, B. (2006). “State of the art assessment of composite systems used to repair transmission pipelines.” Proc., 6th Int. Pipeline Conf. (IPC2006-10484).
Almahakeri, M., Moore, I. D., and Fam, A. (2012). “The flexural behavior of buried steel and composite pipes pulled relative to dense sand: Experimental and numerical investigation.” Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Pipelines (IPC2012), ASME, New York.
American Lifelines Alliance (ALA). (2001). “Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe.” ASCE, Reston, VA 〈http://www.americanlifelinesalliance.com/pdf/Update061305.pdf〉 (May. 06, 2012).
ASCE. (1984). “Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems.” Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifelines, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, ASCE, New York.
ASTM. (2008). “Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.” ASTM D3039/D3039M, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2012). “Standard specification for electric-resistance-welded carbon and alloy steel mechanical tubing.” ASTM A513/A513M, West Conshohocken, PA.
Ellyin, F., and Martens, M. (2001). “Biaxial fatigue behaviour of a multidirectional filament-wound glass-fiber/epoxy pipe.” Compos. Sci. Technol., 61(4), 491–502.
European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group (EGIG). (2008). “7th report of the European gas pipeline incident data group.” Groningen, The Netherlands.
Fam, A., and Son, J. K. (2008). “Finite element modeling of hollow and concrete-filled fiber composite tubes in flexure: Optimization of partial filling and a design method for poles.” Eng. Struct., 30(10), 2667–2676.
Fam, A. Z., and Rizkalla, S. H. (2002). “Flexural behavior of concrete-filled fiber-reinforced polymer circular tubes.” J. Compos. Constr., 6(2), 123–132.
Gemi, L., Tarakcioglu, M., Akdemir, A., and Sahin, O. S. (2009). “Progressive fatigue failure behavior of glass/epoxy (±75)2 filament-wound pipes under pure internal pressure.” Mater. Des., 30(10), 4293–4298.
Gerrard, D. P., Srivatsan, T. S., Scavuzzo, R. J., Miner, T. S., and Olabisi, O. (2007). “An understanding of bending and pressure fatigue of composite pipes.” ASME 2007 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf., ASME, New York.
Hsu, T. W. (1993). “Rate effect on lateral soil restraint of pipeline.” Soils and Foundations, 33(4), 159–169.
Hull, D., Legg, M. J., and Spencer, B. (1978). “Failure of glass/polyester filament wound pipe.” Composites, 9(1), 17–24.
Ibrahim, S. M. (2000). “Performance evaluation of fibre reinforced polymer poles for transmission lines.” PhD Thesis, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
Jones, M. L. C., and Hull, D. (1979). “Microscopy of failure mechanisms in filament-wound pipe.” J. Mater. Sci., 14(1), 165–174.
Karimian, S. A. (2006). “Response of buried steel pipelines subjected to longitudinal and transverse ground movement.” PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Kaynak, C., and Mat, O. (2001). “Uniaxial fatigue behavior of filament-wound glass-fiber/epoxy composite tubes.” Compos. Sci. Technol., 61(13), 1833–1840.
Konuk, I., Phillips, R., Hurley, S., and Paulin, M. J. (1999). “Preliminary ovalisation of buried pipeline subjected to lateral loading.” OMAE99/PIPE,-5023.
Lo, K. H., and Conway, H. D. (1974). “Effect of change of poisson’s ratio on the bending of a multi-layered circular cylinder.” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 16(10), 757–767.
Mandal, S. K. (2004). “Prestressed concrete-filled fiber reinforced polymer tubes.” M.Sc. thesis, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada.
Majid, A., et al. (2011). “Ultimate elastic wall stress (UEWS) test of glass fibre reinforced epoxy (GRE) pipe.” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 42(10), 1500–1508.
Mertiny, P., and Ellyin, F. (2006). “Performance of high-pressure fiber-reinforced polymer composite pipe structures.” Proc., ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division, ASME, New York, 83–89.
National Energy Board (NEB). (2008). “Focus on safety and environment—A comparative analysis of pipeline safety performance 2000-2006.” National Energy Board, Calgary, Alberta.
Paulin, M. J., Phillips, R., Clark, J. I., Trigg, A., and Konuk, I. (1998). “A full-scale investigation into pipeline/soil interaction.” Proc., Int. Pipeline Conf., ASME, New York.
Pipeline Research Council Int. (PRCI). (2004). Guidelines for the seismic design and assessment of natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon pipelines, PRCI, Falls Church, VACatalogue No. L51927.
Rosenow, M. W. K. (1984). “Wind angle effects in glass fibre-reinforced polyester filament wound pipes.” Composites, 15(2), 144–152.
Soden, P. D., Kitching, R., and Tse, P. C. (1989). “Experimental failure stresses for ±55 filament wound glass fibre reinforced plastic tubes under biaxial loads.” Composites, 20(2), 125–135.
Son, J. K., and Fam, A. (2008). “Finite element modeling of hollow and concrete-filled fiber composite tubes in flexure: Model development, verification and investigation of tube parameters.” Eng. Struct., 30(10), 2656–2666.
Trautmann, C. H., and O’Rourke, T. D. (1983). “Behaviour of pipe in dry sand under lateral and uplift loading.” Geotechnical Engineering Rep., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 83–87.
U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Pipeline, and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). (2010). “Significant pipeline incidents.” U.S. DOT, Washington, DC, 〈http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/reports/safety/SigPSI.html〉 (May. 06, 2012).
Xia, M., Takayanagi, H., and Kemmochi, K. (2001). “Analysis of transverse loading for laminated cylindrical pipes.” Compos. Struct., 53(3), 279–285.
Xia, M., Takayanagi, H., and Kemmochi, K. (2002). “Bending behavior of filament-wound fiber-reinforced sandwich pipes.” Compos. Struct., 56(2), 201–210.
Zakaib, S., and Fam, A. (2012). “Flexural performance and moment connection of concrete-filled GFRP tube-encased steel I-sections.” J. Compos. Constr., 16(5), 604–613.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 17Issue 5October 2013
Pages: 702 - 710

History

Received: Jul 18, 2012
Accepted: Oct 15, 2012
Published online: Oct 17, 2012
Discussion open until: Mar 17, 2013
Published in print: Oct 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohamed Almahakeri
M.ASCE
Doctoral Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6.
M.ASCE
Professor and Canada Research Chair in Innovative and Retrofitted Structures, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Ian D. Moore
M.ASCE
Professor and Canada Research Chair in Infrastructure Engineering, GeoEngineering Centre at Queen’s-RMC, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share