Abstract

A mechanical bar splice, which is known as a bar coupler, is an alternative to traditional lap splicing to connect bars in reinforced-concrete (RC) structures. Although it is feasible to incorporate mechanical bar splices in bridge bents as a precast detailing to expedite construction, the use of bar couplers in the plastic hinge region of bridge columns is prohibited in current US codes. This ban was mainly because the coupler performance and the effects of couplers on the seismic behavior of columns were not fully understood. Further, the test data regarding the performance of mechanically spliced bridge columns are scarce, and the available data are for columns with different geometries, confinements, and testing procedures. An experimental investigation was performed to systematically determine the seismic performance of mechanically spliced bridge columns and to develop the most comprehensive test database for these columns. Seven half-scale bridge columns were constructed and tested. One column was cast-in-place (CIP) to serve as the reference model and six were precast and incorporating different couplers at the column base with a coupler product per specimen. Two grouted, one threaded, and three hybrid couplers were included. To minimize the effects of other test parameters, all columns had the same geometry, were longitudinally reinforced with steel bars from a single batch, and were tested under the same loading. The test results showed that seismic couplers, which had a consistent failure mode of bar fracture, reduced the precast column displacement capacities from 3% to 45% compared with CIP and the lateral strength of the precast columns was slightly higher than that of CIP. All precast columns that were tested in this study met the current code seismic requirements; therefore, they might be used in any seismic region of the United States. However, only seismic couplers must be utilized in bridge bents. Finally, a simple design method for mechanically spliced bridge columns was evaluated using a database that consisted of 10 specimens and was viable for practice.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The contents of this document, which was jointly funded by the South Dakota State University, industry partners, and the US DOT through the Mountain Plains Consortium—University Transportation Center, reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the US DOT. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The project objectives could not be accomplished without the support of several industry partners. The authors are indebted to Dayton Superior, Dextra America, nVent LENTON, Headed Reinforcement, Splice Sleeve North America, Contractors Materials Company, and Gage Brothers for sponsoring the project, in-kind material donation, technical feedback, or both throughout the project. The authors would like to thank Mr. Zach Gutzmer, the manager of LSL, and Aric Jensen, an undergraduate student, for their efforts during this project.

References

AASHTO. 2011. AASHTO guide specifications for seismic bridge design. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2013. Guide for testing reinforced concrete structural elements under slowly applied simulated seismic loads. ACI 374.2R-13. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Ameli, M. J., and C. P. Pantelides. 2017. “Seismic analysis of precast concrete bridge columns connected with grouted splice sleeve connectors.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (2): 13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001678.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). ASTM C109. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM E8. 2021. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM E8. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bompa, D. V., and A. Y. Elghazouli. 2019. “Inelastic cyclic behaviour of RC members incorporating threaded reinforcement couplers.” Eng. Struct. 180: 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.053.
Brenes, F. J., S. L. Wood, and M. E. Kreger. 2006. Anchorage requirements for grouted vertical-duct connectors in precast bent cap systems. Rep. No. FHWA/TX-06/0-4176-1. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas.
Cruz Noguez, C. A., and M. S. Saiidi. 2012. “Shake-table studies of a four-span bridge model with advanced materials.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (2): 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000457.
Dahal, P. K., and M. Tazarv. 2020. “Mechanical bar splices for incorporation in plastic hinge regions of RC members.” Constr. Build. Mater. 258: 120308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120308.
ElGawady, M., A. J. Booker, and H. M. Dawood. 2010. “Seismic behavior of posttensioned concrete-filled fiber tubes.” J. Compos. Constr. 14 (5): 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000107.
Galvis, F. A., and J. F. Correal. 2018. “Anchorage of bundled bars grouted in ducts.” ACI Struct. J. 115 (2): 415–424. https://doi.org/10.14359/51701280.
Haber, Z. B., M. S. Saiidi, and D. H. Sanders. 2014. “Seismic performance of precast columns with mechanically spliced column-footing connections.” ACI Struct. J. 111 (3): 639–650. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686624.
Haraldsson, O. S., T. M. Janes, M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2013. “Seismic resistance of socket connection between footing and precast column.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (9): 910–919. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000413.
Hewes, J. T. 2013. Analysis of the state of the art of precast concrete bridge substructure systems. Rep. No. FHWA-AZ-13-687. Phoenix: Arizona Dept. of Transportation, Research Center.
Jeong, H. I. L., J. Sakai, and S. A. Mahin. 2008. Shaking table tests and numerical investigation of self-centering reinforced concrete bridge columns. Rep. No. PEER-2008/06. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Krawinkler, H., and P. D. Moncarz. 1982. “Similitude requirements for dynamic models.” ACI Spec. Publ. 73: 1–22.
Mashal, M., and A. Palermo. 2019. “Emulative seismic resistant technology for accelerated bridge construction.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 124: 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.12.016.
Matsumoto, E. E., M. C. Waggoner, G. Sumen, and M. E. Krege. 2001. Development of a precast bent cap system. Rep. No. FHWA/TX-0-1748-2. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas.
Mehraein, M., and M. S. Saiidi. 2019. “Seismic performance and design of bridge column-to-pile shaft pipe-pin connections in precast and cast-in-place bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (13): 1471–1490. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3209.
Mehrsoroush, A., and M. S. Saiidi. 2016. “Cyclic response of precast bridge piers with novel column-base pipe pins and pocket cap beam connections.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (4): 04015080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000833.
Mohebbi, A., M. S. Saiidi, and A. M. Itani. 2018. “Shake table studies and analysis of a PT-UHPC bridge column with pocket connection.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (4): 04018021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001997.
Nikoukalam, M. T., and P. Sideris. 2019. “Experimental characterization and constitutive modeling of polyurethanes for structural applications, accounting for damage, hysteresis, loading rate and long term effects.” Eng. Struct. 198: 109462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109462.
Ou, Y. C., M. Chiewanichakorn, A. J. Aref, and G. C. Lee. 2007. “Seismic performance of segmental precast unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (11): 1636–1647. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1636).
Pang, J. B. K., M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2010. “Large-bar connection for precast bridge bents in seismic regions.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (3): 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000081.
Qu, H., J. Fu, T. Li, C. Wu, X. Sun, H. Wei, and Z. Wang. 2021. “Experimental and numerical assessment of precast bridge columns with different grouted splice sleeve coupler designs based on shake table test.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (8): 04021055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001748.
Restrepo, J. I., M. J. Tobolski, and E. E. Matsumoto. 2011. Development of a precast bent cap system for seismic regions. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Rep. 681. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, National Academies Press.
Saiidi, M. S., M. Mehraein, G. Shrestha, E. Jordan, A. Itani, M. Tazarv, D. Sanders, T. M. Murphy, M. L. Reno, and M. N. Pohll. 2020. Proposed AASHTO seismic specifications for ABC column connections. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Rep. No. 935. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, National Academies Press.
Sideris, P., A. J. Aref, and A. Filiatrault. 2014. “Quasi-static cyclic testing of a large-scale hybrid sliding-rocking segmental column with slip-dominant joints.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (10): 04014036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000605.
Sjurseth, T., E. Greeneway, K. Hart, M. LaVoy, M. Tazarv, and N. Wehbe. 2022. Mechanically spliced precast bridge columns. MPC Rep. No. 22-451. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State Univ. - Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, Mountain-Plains Consortium (MPC).
Steuck, K. P., M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2009. “Anchorage of large-diameter reinforcing bars in ducts.” ACI Struct. J. 106 (4): 506–513.
Tazarv, M., and M. S. Saiidi. 2014. Next generation of bridge columns for accelerated bridge construction in high seismic zones. Rep. No. CCEER-14-06. Reno, NV: Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, Univ. of Nevada.
Tazarv, M., and M. S. Saiidi. 2016a. “Low-damage precast columns for accelerated bridge construction in high seismic zones.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (3): 04015056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000806.
Tazarv, M., and M. S. Saiidi. 2016b. “Seismic design of bridge columns incorporating mechanical bar splices in plastic hinge regions.” Eng. Struct. 124: 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.041.
Tazarv, M., G. Shrestha, and M. S. Saiidi. 2021. “State-of-the-art review and design of grouted duct connections for precast bridge columns.” Structures 30: 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.091.
Tran, H. V., and J. F. Stanton. 2012. Drilled shaft socket connections for precast columns in seismic regions. Seattle: Dept. of Civil and Environmental, Univ. of Washington.
Valigura, J., M. Salehi, A. B. Liel, and P. Sideris. 2020. “Seismic repair assessment of hybrid sliding-rocking bridge columns through integrated experimentation and expert panel solicitation.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (9): 04020191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002776.
Varela, S., and M. S. Saiidi. 2019. “Experimental study on seismically resilient two-span bridge models designed for disassembly.” J. Earthquake Eng. 23 (1): 72–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1309724.
Wang, Z., H. Qu, T. Li, H. Wei, H. Wang, H. Duan and H. Jiang. 2018. “Quasi-static cyclic tests of precast bridge columns with different connection details for high seismic zones.” Eng. Struct. 158: 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.035.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 11November 2022

History

Received: Feb 28, 2022
Accepted: Jun 26, 2022
Published online: Sep 1, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 1, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mostafa Tazarv, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Theodore Sjurseth [email protected]
Former Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007. Email: [email protected]
Evan Greeneway [email protected]
Former Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007. Email: [email protected]
Kallan Hart [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007. Email: [email protected]
Mathew LaVoy [email protected]
Former Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Department Head, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6266-8378. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Analysis and design of mechanically spliced precast bridge columns, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115726, 280, (115726), (2023).
  • Post-earthquake serviceability assessment of standard RC bridge columns using computer vision and seismic analyses, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115002, 272, (115002), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share