Technical Papers
May 25, 2022

Bridge Damage, Repair Costs, and Fragilities for Inland Flood Events

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 8

Abstract

Flood events bring havoc to transportation assets including bridges, culverts, and roadways on an annual basis. This has been an increasing trend in the recent years, especially in Midwestern states. Millions of dollars are spent to repair or replace transportation infrastructure every year due to damage suffered from floods. With a major drive within transportation agencies to consider the risks associated with transportation asset damages, and provide optimized plans for pre-event mitigation and postevent recovery, there is a need for better estimation of the type of damages observed after inland flood events and the associated costs for the repair and recovery of these damages. Most previous studies have focused on recovery after earthquakes, which by nature imposes a different organizational and response effect on the agencies. The limited number of studies on other hazards such as coastal flooding is based on sparse survey data. This paper specifically aims to address the existing gap in the availability of data on damages and costs that are observed after actual inland flood events. For this purpose, the damage patterns associated with scour, high water levels, debris accumulation, abutment wash out, and other damages have been identified. The extreme flood events throughout a 16-year span (1998–2014) that were documented as part of the emergency relief funds have been considered. Repair tasks associated with each damage mode are identified based on actual project documents and costs are broken down by each of these tasks. This component by itself is a leap forward in collection of types of damages and associated costs for inland flood events. In addition, generalized linear models are conducted to identify the relationships between flood stage, bridge characteristics, and damage level using both Gaussian and binomial distributions of the responses. Analyses shows that the maximum water elevation at a bridge location is statistically significant in determining the probability of bridge damage. There are also many other bridge attributes including length, width, skew angle, and pier width that have a correlation to different damage modes of bridges. A series of National Bridge Inventory condition ratings are analyzed with the scour criticality rating and superstructure rating both being significant predictors in the probability of multiple bridge damage modes. This paper is the first known effort aims at identifying the type of damages associated with inland flood events, the associated repair tasks, and costs of recovery through a coordinate data collection effort from actual events and completed projects and is expected to majorly contribute to future studies aimed at assessing the resilience of transportation infrastructure under inland flooding events by providing better estimates of the recovery tasks and costs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdelkarim, O. I., M. A. ElGawady, A. Gheni, S. Anumolu, and M. Abdulazeez. 2017. “Seismic performance of innovative hollow-core FRP–concrete–steel bridge columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (2): 04016120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000985.
Abdulazeez, M., A. Gheni, N. Colbert, and M. ElGawady. 2018. “Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of hollow-core composite bridge columns.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf., on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Risk, Management and Life-Cycle Performance of Bridges, 437–444. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Balkema.
Alipour, A. 2010. “Life-cycle performance assessment of highway bridges under multi-hazard conditions and environmental stressors.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California Irvine.
Alipour, A. 2016. Post-extreme event damage assessment and response for highway bridges. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Alipour, A., and B. Shafei. 2016a. “Assessment of postearthquake losses in a network of aging bridges.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 22 (2): 04015023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000253.
Alipour, A., and B. Shafei. 2016b. “Seismic resilience of transportation networks with deteriorating components.” J. Struct. Eng. 142: 8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001399.
Anarde, K., S. Kameshwar, J. Irza, J. Nittrouer, J. Lorenzo-Trueba, J. Padgett, A. Sebastian, and P. Bedient. 2018. “Impacts of hurricane storm surge on infrastructure vulnerability for an evolving coastal landscape.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 19: 1. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000265.
Ataei, N., and J. Padgett. 2013. “Probabilistic modeling of bridge deck unseating during hurricane events.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (4): 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000371.
Auyeung, S., and A. Alipour. 2016. “Evaluation of AASHTO suggested design values for reinforced concrete bridge piers under vehicle collisions.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2592: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3141/2592-01.
Auyeung, S., A. Alipour, and D. Saini. 2019. “Performance-based design of bridge piers under vehicle collision.” Eng. Struct. 191: 752–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.005.
Chen, X., and Z. Zhang. 2014. “Effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita flooding on Louisiana pavement performance. Pavement materials.” Struct. Perform. 239: 212–221.
Choi, E., R. DesRoches, and B. Nielson. 2004. “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct. 26 (2): 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006.
Cui, Z., A. Alipour, and B. Shafei. 2019. “Structural performance of deteriorating reinforced concrete columns under multiple earthquake events.” Eng. Struct. 191: 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.073.
DenOuden, C. 2019. “Pennington county approves local disaster declaration.” Rapid City Journal. Accessed December 2020. https://rapidcityjournal.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/pennington-county-approves-local-disaster-declaration/article_0cc2fb5e-bec6-5a12-a57c-a289c2b2292a.html.
DOT. 1995. Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges. Rep. No. FHWA-PD-96-001. Washington, DC: DOT.
DOT. 2012. Evaluating scour at bridges. 5th ed. Hydraulic Circular No. 18 (HEC 18). FHWA-HIF-12-003. Washington, DC: DOT.
El-Tawil, S., E. Severino, and P. Fonseca. 2005. “Vehicle collision with bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (3): 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:3(345).
Fioklou, A., and A. Alipour. 2019. “Significance of non-uniform scour in seismic performance of bridges.” J. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (6): 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1584226.
Gaspard, K., M. Martinez, Z. Zhang, and Z. Wu. 2007. Impact of Hurricane Katrina on roadways in the New Orleans area. Technical Assistance Rep. No. 07-2TA. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
Hung, C.-C., and W.-G. Yau. 2017. “Vulnerability evaluation of scoured bridges under floods.” Eng. Struct. 132: 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.044.
Kameshwar, S., S. Misra, and J. E. Padgett. 2020. “Decision tree based bridge restoration models for extreme event performance assessment of regional road networks.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16: 431. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1668026.
Karamlou, A., and P. Bocchini. 2017. “From component damage to system-level probabilistic restoration functions for a damaged bridge.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23: 04016042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000342.
Klinga, J., and A. Alipour. 2015. “Assessment of structural integrity of bridges under extreme scour.” Eng. Struct. 82: 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.021.
Lichty, B. 2020. “A probabilistic approach for restoration optimization of transportation infrastructure assets in response to flood event damages.” Master thesis, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State Univ.
Mallick, R., M. Tao, J. Daniel, J. Jacobs, and A. Verraragavan. 2017. “Development of a methodology and a tool for the assessment of vulnerability of roadways to flood-induced damage.” J. Flood Risk Manage. 10: 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12135.
Martin, J., A. Alipour, and P. Sarkar. 2019. “Fragility surfaces for multi-hazard analysis of suspension bridges under earthquakes and microbursts.” Eng. Struct. 197: 109169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.011.
Melville, B. W., and D. M. Dongol. 1992. “Bridge pier scour with debris accumulation.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 118 (9): 1306–1310. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:9(1306).
Misra, S., J. Padgett, A. Barbosa, and B. Webb. 2020. “An expert opinion survey on post-hazard resotartion of roadways and bridges: Data and key insights.” Earthquake Spectra 36 (2): 983–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019891722.
Mollenkamp, A. 2019. “Nebraska roads and bridges still in recovery after flooding.” NET News. Accessed December 2020. http://netnebraska.org/article/news/1181479/nebraska-roads-and-bridges-still-recovery-after-flooding.
Muñoz Diaz, E. E., F. N. Moreno, and J. Mohammadi. 2009. “Investigation of common causes of bridge collapse in Colombia.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 14 (4): 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000006.
Nogal, M., and D. Honfi. 2019. “Assessment of road traffic resilience assuming stochastic user behaviour.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 185: 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.013.
Nogal, M., A. O’Conner, B. Martinez-Pastor, and B. Caulfield. 2017. “Novel probabilistic resilience assessment framework of transportation networks against extreme weather events.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (3): 04017004.
Oppong, K., S. Dikshant, and B. Shafei. 2020. “Vulnerability assessment of bridge piers damaged in barge collision to subsequent hurricane events.” J. Bridge Eng. 25: 8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001576.
Padgett, J., and R. DesRoches. 2007. “Sensitivity of seismic response and fragility to parameter uncertainty.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (12): 1710–1718. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:12(1710).
Padgett, J., R. DesRoches, B. Nielson, M. Yashinsky, O. Kwon, N. Burdette, and E. Tavera. 2008. “Bridge damage and repair costs from Hurricane Katrina.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (1): 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:1(6).
Padgett, J., A. Spiller, and C. Arnold. 2012. “Statistical analysis of coastal bridge vulnerability based on empirical evidence from Hurricane Katrina.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 8 (6): 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470902855343.
Pagliara, S., and I. Carnacina. 2011. “Influence of wood debris accumulation on bridge pier scour.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 137 (2): 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000289.
Pitt, D. 2019. “Midwest flooding costs increasing, with $1.6B damage in Iowa.” Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/cc5a796b2eab4784900e853f1ba8d854.
Porter, K. 2004. A survey of bridge practitioners to relate damage to closure. Report No. EERL 2004-07. Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory.
Pregnolato, M., A. Ford, S. Wilkinson, and R. Dawson. 2017. “The impact of flooding on road transport: A depth-disruption function.” Transp. Res. Part D 55: 67–81.
Shang, Y., A. Alipour, and A. Ye. 2018. “Selection of input motion for seismic analysis of scoured pile-supported bridge with simplified models.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (8): 04018099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002067.
Shrestha, B., A. Gheni, M. Abdulazeez, and M. ElGawady. 2020. “Innovative approach to repair corroded steel piles using ultra-high performance concrete.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (12): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120929329.
Testa, A. C., M. N. Furtado, and A. Alipour. 2015. “Resilience of coastal transportation networks in the face of climatic extreme events.” Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2532: 29–36.
Wardhana, K., and F. C. Hadipriono. 2003. “Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 17 (3): 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144).
Zhang, N., and A. Alipour. 2019. “Integrated framework for risk and resilience assessment of the road network under inland flooding.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (12): 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119855975.
Zhang, N., and A. Alipour. 2020a. “Multi-scale robustness model for highway networks under flood events.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 83: 102281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102281.
Zhang, N., and A. Alipour. 2020b. “Two-stage model for optimized mitigation and recovery of bridge network with final goal of resilience.” Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2674 (10): 114–123.
Zhang, N., and A. Alipour. 2021. “A multi-step assessment framework for optimization of flood mitigation strategies in transportation networks.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 63: 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102439.
Zhang, N., and A. Alipour. 2022. “Flood risk assessment and application of risk curves for design of mitigation strategies.” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 36: 100490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100490.
Zhang, N., A. Alipour, and L. Coronel. 2018. “Application of novel recovery techniques to enhance the resilience of transportation networks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (1): 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118797510.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 8August 2022

History

Received: Mar 12, 2021
Accepted: Jan 14, 2022
Published online: May 25, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 25, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nathan Miner, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6893-9602. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Data-Driven Bridge Maintenance Cost Estimation Framework for Annual Expenditure Planning, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5706, 40, 2, (2024).
  • Review of Hydraulic Bridge Failures: Historical Statistic Analysis, Failure Modes, and Prediction Methods, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5763, 28, 4, (2023).
  • The Assessment of Climate Change Impacts and Land-use Changes on Flood Characteristics: The Case Study of the Kelani River Basin, Sri Lanka, Hydrology, 10.3390/hydrology9100177, 9, 10, (177), (2022).
  • Probability of failure estimation for highway bridges under combined effects of uncorrelated multiple hazards, Resilient Cities and Structures, 10.1016/j.rcns.2022.10.007, 1, 3, (79-93), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share