Design, Construction, Testing, and Behavior of Driven Precast Concrete Piles Reinforced with GFRP Bars and Spirals
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 8
Abstract
Marine, coastal structures, and bridges deteriorate prematurely due to corrosion. Numerous failures have occurred in substructure members of these structures, such as piles, leading to very high repair and replacement costs. Problems related to corrosion could be resolved through the use of noncorroding materials such as fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. This paper presents the design, construction details, driving test procedures, and results of the field dynamic driving testing of precast glass-FRP (GFRP) reinforced concrete (RC) piles, as well as laboratory test results, to determine the piles flexural strength. Four piles were longitudinally and transversally reinforced with GFRP bars, spirals, and ties. Two of the piles were 6.0 m (approximately 20 ft) long, were fabricated, instrumented, and were laboratory tested for flexural strength. The other two piles were 18.0 m (approximately 60 ft) in length, were field installed and dynamically monitored. They were driven and monitored at the Arthur Drive Bridge project site in Lynn Haven, Panama City, Florida. Pile driving and testing were performed with a Vulcan 512 single-acting air hammer. The embedded data collectors (EDCs) were used to monitor the piles during driving operations. Field driving observations and results indicate that no pile damage occurred during installation. GFRP spirals successfully confined the concrete core of the piles and prevented cover spalling during driving. The maximum tensile and compressive stresses measured in the piles were well within the allowable design limits. Design aids and recommendations for good driving practices for GFRP-RC piles were presented. The promising results presented for the driven precast GFRP-RC piles represent a further step toward field application.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their special thanks and gratitude to the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur, recherche, science et technologie du Québec, Canada Research Chair Program, the Fonds de la recherche du Quebec-Nature et Technologie (FRQ-NT) for their financial support, Pultrall Inc. (Thetford Mines, Quebec) for the donation of the GFRP reinforcement, and the technical staff of the Structural laboratory in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Sherbrooke. The authors would like to thank Gate Precast Company (Jacksonville, Florida), Smart Structures (Rivera Beach, Florida), and the contractor F&W Construction Company for fabricating, monitoring, driving, and testing the piles, respectively. Lastly, the authors would like to express their special thanks to FDOT and the University of North Florida (UNF), Florida, for logistic help in testing the piles.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- Af
- area of the bars below the mid-depth of the section to consider the effect of the uniformly distributed bars;
- Ef
- longitudinal elastic modulus of the GFRP bars;
- concrete cylinder strength;
- ffd
- design tensile strength of GFRP reinforcing bars;
- ffu
- ultimate tensile strength of GFRP reinforcing bars;
- Mc
- moment at a concrete strain equal to 0.001;
- Mn
- nominal moment capacity;
- Multimate
- ultimate moment;
- Sapc
- maximum allowed pile compressive stresses;
- Sapt
- maximum allowed pile tensile stresses;
- φda
- resistance factor for drivability analysis; equal to 1.0 in the case of concrete piles reinforced with GFRP bars;
- ρf
- reinforcement ratio;
- ρfb
- balanced reinforcement ratio;
- ɛcu
- maximum usable compressive strain in the concrete;
- ψc
- curvature at a concrete strain equal to 0.001 (service condition); and
- ψultimate
- curvature at ultimate.
References
AASHTO. 2018. “AASHTO LRFD bridge design guide specifications for GFRP-reinforced concrete.” 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2015. Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars. ACI 440.1R-15. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Afifi, M. Z., H. M. Mohamed, and B. Benmokrane. 2014. “Strength and axial behavior of circular concrete columns reinforced with CFRP bars and spirals.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (2): 04013035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000430.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for tensile properties of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite bars. ASTM D7205/D7205M-06. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Cadenazzi, T., G. Dotelli, M. Rossini, S. Nolan, and A. Nanni. 2020. “Cost and environmental analyses of reinforcement alternatives for a concrete bridge.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (4): 787–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1662066.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2012. Design and construction of building components with fiber reinforced polymers. CAN/CSA S806-12. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CAN/CSA S6-19. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
De Corte, W., and V. Boel. 2013. “Effectiveness of spirally shaped stirrups in reinforced concrete beams.” Eng. Struct. 52: 667–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.032.
De Luca, A., F. Matta, and A. Nanni. 2010. “Behavior of full-scale glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete columns under axial load.” ACI Struct. J. 107 (5): 589–596.
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). 2014. FDOT standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.
Guérin, M., H. M. Mohamed, B. Benmokrane, A. Nanni, and C. K. Shield. 2018. “Eccentric behavior of full-scale reinforced concrete columns with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars and ties.” ACI Struct. J. 115 (2): 489–500. https://doi.org/10.14359/51701107.
Hadi, M. N. S., H. Karim, and M. N. Sheikh. 2016. “Experimental investigations on circular concrete columns reinforced with GFRP bars and helices under different loading conditions.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (4): 04016009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000670.
Hu, Z., M. McVay, D. Bloomquist, D. Horhota, and P. Lai. 2012. “New ultimate pile capacity prediction method based on cone penetration test (CPT).” Can. Geotech. J. 49 (8): 961–967. https://doi.org/10.1139/t2012-051.
Hussein, M. H., and G. E. Likins. 1993. “Driving long precast concrete piles.” In Proc., 14th Int. Congress of the Precast Concrete Industry, 1–7. Brussels, Belgium: Bureau International du Béton Manufacturé (BIBM).
Jaeger, L. G., A. A. Mufti, and G. Tadros. 1997. “The concept of the overall performance factor in rectangular-section reinforced concrete members.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-3), 551–559. Tokyo: Japan Concrete Institute.
Jimenez Vicaria, J. D., D. Fernandez Diaz, E. Manzano Arroyo, and C. Paulotto. 2014. “Analysis of the technical viability of GFRP reinforced precast concrete piles.” In Proc., 16th European Conf. on Composite Materials, 1–8. Seville, Spain: School of Engineering, University of Seville.
Likins, G. E., B. H. Fellenius, and R. D. Holtz. 2012. “Pile driving formulas: Past and present—Full-scale testing and foundation design.” Geo-Inst. Geotech. Spec. Publ. 227: 737–753.
Moser, R., B. Holland, L. Kahn, P. Singh, and K. Kurtis. 2011. Durability of precast prestressed concrete piles in marine environment: Reinforcement corrosion and mitigation—Part 1. Final Report Prepared for Office of Materials and Research Georgia Department of Transportation GDOT Research Project No. 07-30 Task Order No. 02-55. Atlanta: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Mousa, S., H. M. Mohamed, and B. Benmokrane. 2018. “Flexural strength and design analysis of circular reinforced concrete members with GFRP bars and spirals.” ACI Struct. J. 115 (5): 1353–1364. https://doi.org/10.14359/51702282.
Mousa, S., H. M. Mohamed, and B. Benmokrane. 2019. “Strength and deformability aspects of circular concrete members reinforced with hybrid carbon-FRP and glass-FRP under flexure.” J. Compos. Constr. 23 (2): 04019005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000931.
NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers) International. 2002. Corrosion costs and preventive strategies in the United States. Pub. No. FHWA-RD-01-156. Houston: NACE International.
NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2020. Guide specification for service life design of highway bridges. Final Rep. for NCHRP Project 12-108. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nolan, S., T. Cadenazzi, G. Dotelli, M. Rossini, A. Nanni, C. Knight, and I. Lasa. 2019. “The 200-year bridge substructure: Resilience and sustainability.” In Proc., 20th Congress of IABSE, 1207–1213. New York: The Evolving Metropolis.
Rausche, F., and M. Hussein. 2000. “Pile driving in calcareous sediments.” In Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering for Calcareous Sediments, edited by K. A. Al-Shafei, 345–359. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Salah-Eldin, A., H. M. Mohamed, and B. Benmokrane. 2019. “Structural performance of high-strength-concrete columns reinforced with GFRP bars and ties subjected to eccentric loads.” Eng. Struct. 185: 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.143.
Smart-structures. 2017. “Embedded data collector (EDC) Evaluation phase II—Comparison with instrumented Static Load Tests.” Accessed Febrauary 15, 2021. http://smart-structures.com/index.html.
Tobbi, H., A. S. Farghaly, and B. Benmokrane. 2012. “Concrete columns reinforced longitudinally and transversally with glass fiber-reinforced polymers bars.” ACI Struct. J. 109 (4): 1–8.
Zadeh, H. J., and A. Nanni. 2013. “Design of RC columns using glass FRP reinforcement.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (3): 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000354.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 2, 2020
Accepted: Apr 11, 2021
Published online: Jun 3, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Nov 3, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Pranit Malla, Seyed Saman Khedmatgozar Dolati, Jesus D. Ortiz, Armin B. Mehrabi, Antonio Nanni, Kien Dinh, Feasibility of Conventional Non-Destructive Testing Methods in Detecting Embedded FRP Reinforcements, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app13074399, 13, 7, (4399), (2023).
- Mahdi Aflakisamani, Salaheldin Mousa, Hamdy M. Mohamed, Ehab A. Ahmed, Brahim Benmokrane, Design and Testing of Lightweight Self-Consolidating Concrete Bridge-Deck Slabs Reinforced with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars, ACI Structural Journal, 10.14359/51738717, 120, 4, (2023).
- Wenlei Xu, Hailin Miao, Yuzhi Chen, Pull-out behavior and damage assessment of core concrete of Full-scale prestressed High-strength hollow square piles, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.159, 51, (1906-1918), (2023).
- Reza Hassanli, Osama Youssf, Alan Manalo, Mohammad Amir Najafgholipour, Mohamed Elchalakani, Enrique del Rey Castillo, Darren Lutze, An Experimental Study of the Behavior of GFRP-Reinforced Precast Concrete Culverts, Journal of Composites for Construction, 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001224, 26, 5, (2022).
- Ahmed Elhamaymy, Hamdy Mohamed, Allan Manalo, Brahim Benmokrane, Uniaxial Compression Behavior of Short Square and Circular RC Piles Constructed with GFRP Bars and Spirals Preconditioned in Simulated Marine Environments, Journal of Composites for Construction, 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001219, 26, 3, (2022).
- Fei Peng, Weichen Xue, Experimental Investigation on Shear Behavior of FRP Prestressed Concrete Beams with Shear Reinforcements, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001930, 27, 10, (2022).
- Zhihao Wang, Jianhe Xie, Jianglin Li, Peng Liu, Cuiqing Shi, Zhongyu Lu, Flexural behaviour of seawater–sea sand concrete beams reinforced with GFRP bars: Effects of the reinforcement ratio, stirrup ratio, shear span ratio and prestress level, Journal of Building Engineering, 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104566, 54, (104566), (2022).
- Sheng Li, Shuaicheng Guo, Yong Yi, Md Zillur Rahman, Xiayang Bai, Caijun Shi, Zuquan Jin, Deju Zhu, Transverse low-velocity impact performance of BFRP bars after exposure to the saline-alkaline environment, Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124650, 307, (124650), (2021).