Technical Papers
Jan 12, 2021

Resilience and Economic Loss Assessment of Highway Bridges in Deep Reservoir under Near-Fault Ground Motions

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 3

Abstract

Bridges located in deep reservoir are exposed to threats from near-fault ground motions. The resilience and economic loss of a highway bridge in deep reservoir under near-fault ground motions require better understanding. This study incorporated the existing resilience and economic loss assessment framework with the effect of post-earthquake underwater repair. The methodology was illustrated to evaluate the seismic performance of an example highway continuous rigid-frame bridge in deep reservoir. The three-dimensional nonlinear numerical model of the example bridge was built with the hydrodynamic added mass estimated by the fluid-structure interaction model. Two types of near-fault ground motions, the forward-directivity and fling-step ground motions, were selected to conduct the nonlinear seismic analyses of the bridge. The fragilities of the piers, bearings, and the bridge system were assessed and resilience and economic loss of the example bridge under different types of near-fault ground motions were evaluated and compared. It can be concluded from the studies that: (1) the peak ground velocity (PGV) is suggested to be taken as the intensity measures of ground motions for the probabilistic seismic demand models of the bridge in deep reservoir; (2) the fling-step ground motions caused larger pier, bearing, and system damage probability, but lower resilience and bigger economic loss than the forward-directivity ground motions; (3) the structural resilience decreases, whereas the economic loss increases with the increasing water level; and (4) the highest water level and the fling-step ground motions result in the worst performance of the example highway bridges in deep reservoir near active faults. The framework not only aids engineers to better understand the seismic performance, but also assists in the decision-making of post-event rehabilitation activities for the highway bridges in deep reservoir.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51978578 and 51708455).

References

ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1999. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Rep. No. ATC-13. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Bray, J. D., and A. Rodriguez-Marek. 2004. “Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 24 (11): 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.05.001.
Burks, L. S., and J. W. Baker. 2016. “A predictive model for fling-step in near-fault ground motions based on recordings and simulations.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 80: 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.10.010.
Chen, X., J. Li, and Z. Guan. 2019. “Fragility analysis of tall pier bridges subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (8): 1082–1095. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1683589.
Choe, D.-E., P. Gardoni, D. Rosowsky, and T. Haukaas. 2008. “Probabilistic capacity models and seismic fragility estimates for RC columns subject to corrosion.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 (3): 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.12.015.
Choe, D.-E., P. Gardoni, D. Rosowsky, and T. Haukaas. 2009. “Seismic fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges subject to corrosion.” Struct. Saf. 31 (4): 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.10.001.
Choi, E., R. DesRoches, and B. Nielson. 2004. “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct. 26 (2): 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006.
Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
Dezfuli, F. H., and M. S. Alam. 2017. “Effect of different steel-reinforced elastomeric isolators on the seismic fragility of a highway bridge.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 24 (2): e1866. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.v24.2.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2010. Environmental conditions and environmental loads. DNV-RP-C205. Oslo, Norway: DNV.
Dong, Y., and D. M. Frangopol. 2015. “Risk and resilience assessment of bridges under mainshock and aftershocks incorporating uncertainties.” Eng. Struct. 83: 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.050.
Dong, Y., D. M. Frangopol, and D. Saydam. 2013. “Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (10): 1451–1467. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.v42.10.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2011. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology: Earthquake model Hazus-MH MR5 technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Feng, R., X. Wang, W. Yuan, and J. Yu. 2018. “Impact of seismic excitation direction on the fragility analysis of horizontally curved concrete bridges.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 16 (10): 4705–4733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0400-2.
Frangopol, D. M., Y. Dong, and S. Sabatino. 2017. “Bridge life-cycle performance and cost: Analysis, prediction, optimisation and decision-making.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 13 (10): 1239–1257.
Guan, Z. G., J. H. Zhang, and J. Z. Li. 2017. “Multilevel performance classifications of tall RC bridge columns toward postearthquake rehabilitation requirements.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (10): 04017080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001111.
HAZUS. 2003. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology earthquake model. Technical Manual. Washington, DC: Dept. of Homeland Security Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate FEMA Mitigation Division.
He, H., K. Wei, J. Zhang, and S. Qin. 2020. “Application of endurance time method to seismic fragility evaluation of highway bridges considering scour effect.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 136: 106243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106243.
Issa, A., and M. S. Alam. 2020. “Comparative seismic fragility assessment of buckling restrained and self-centering (friction spring and SMA) braced frames.” Smart Mater. Struct. 29 (5): 055029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab7858.
Jiang, H., Q. Chu, and Y.-T. Cui. 2015. “Influence of pulse parameters on dynamic response of bridge pier in deep water excited by near-fault earthquakes.” [In Chinese.] J. China Railway Soc. 37 (8): 80–90.
Jiang, H., B. X. Wang, X. Y. Bai, C. Zeng, and H. D. Zhang. 2017a. “Simplified expression of hydrodynamic pressure on deepwater cylindrical bridge piers during earthquakes.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (6): 04017014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001032.
Jiang, H., Z. Wang, X. Bai, C. Zeng, and M. Wang. 2017b. “Nonlinear responses and damage characteristics for group-piles foundation of a deep-water bridge under strong near-fault and far-field earthquakes.” [In Chinese.] J. Vib. Shock 36 (24): 13–22.
Kalkan, E., and S. K. Kunnath. 2006. “Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (2): 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2192560.
Kalkan, E., and S. K. Kunnath. 2007. “Effective cyclic energy as a measure of seismic demand.” J. Earthquake Eng. 11 (5): 725–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460601033827.
Li, S., F. Zhang, J.-Q. Wang, M. S. Alam, and J. Zhang. 2017. “Effects of near-fault motions and artificial pulse-type ground motions on super-span cable-stayed bridge systems.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (3): 04016128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001008.
Liaw, C.-Y., and A. K. Chopra. 1974. “Dynamics of towers surrounded by water.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 3 (1): 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
Lin, P., B. Huang, Q. Li, and R. Wang. 2015. “Hazard and seismic reinforcement analysis for typical large dams following the Wenchuan earthquake.” Eng. Geol. 194: 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.05.011.
Mangalathu, S., J.-S. Jeon, and J. Jiang. 2019. “Skew adjustment factors for fragilities of California box-girder bridges subjected to near-fault and far-field ground motions.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (1): 04018109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001338.
Mavroeidis, G. P., and A. S. Papageorgiou. 2003. “A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 (3): 1099–1131. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020100.
McKenna, F. 2011. “OpenSees: A framework for earthquake engineering simulation.” Comput. Sci. Eng. 13 (4): 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.66.
Menegotto, M. 1973. “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending.” In Proc., Int. Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 15–22. Zürich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Nielson, B. G., and R. DesRoches. 2007. “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (6): 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
Padgett, J. E., B. G. Nielson, and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (5): 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
Pang, Y., L. Cai, H. Ouyang, and X. Zhou. 2019. “Seismic performance assessment of different fibers reinforced concrete columns using incremental dynamic analysis.” Constr. Build. Mater. 203: 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.087.
Pang, Y. T., K. Wei, W. C. Yuan, and G. Y. Shen. 2015. “Effects of dynamic fluid-structure interaction on seismic response of multi-span deep water bridges using fragility function method.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 18 (4): 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.18.4.525.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2013. PEER ground motion database. Berkeley, CA: PEER.
Scott, B. D., R. Park, and M. J. N. Priestley. 1982. “Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates.” J. Proc. 79 (1): 13–27.
Sehhati, R., A. Rodriguez-Marek, M. ElGawady, and W. F. Cofer. 2011. “Effects of near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses on multi-story structures.” Eng. Struct. 33 (3): 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.032.
Stein, S. M., G. KennethYoung, R. E. Trent, and D. R. Pearson. 1999. “Prioritizing scour vulnerable bridges using risk.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 5 (3): 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1999)5:3(95).
Wang, G., Y. Wang, W. Lu, M. Yu, and C. Wang. 2017. “Deterministic 3D seismic damage analysis of Guandi concrete gravity dam: A case study.” Eng. Struct. 148: 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.060.
Wei, K., J. Zhang, and S. Qin. 2019. “Experimental and numerical assessment into frequency domain dynamic response of deep water rigid-frame bridge.” J. Earthquake Eng. 30 (12): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1684402.
Xiang, N., and M. S. Alam. 2019. “Displacement-based seismic design of bridge bents retrofitted with various bracing devices and their seismic fragility assessment under near-fault and far-field ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 119: 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.12.023.
Xiang, N., X. Chen, and M. S. Alam. 2020. “Probabilistic seismic fragility and loss analysis of concrete bridge piers with superelastic shape memory alloy-steel coupled reinforcing bars.” Eng. Struct. 207: 110229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110229.
Xie, Y., and J. Zhang. 2018. “Design and optimization of seismic isolation and damping devices for highway bridges based on probabilistic repair cost ratio.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (8): 04018125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002139.
Xin, L., X. Li, Z. Zhang, and L. Zhao. 2019. “Seismic behavior of long-span concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge subjected to near-fault fling-step motions.” Eng. Struct. 180: 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.006.
Yadav, K. K., and V. K. Gupta. 2017. “Near-fault fling-step ground motions: Characteristics and simulation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 101: 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.022.
Yang, W. L., and Q. Li. 2013. “The expanded Morison equation considering inner and outer water hydrodynamic pressure of hollow piers.” Ocean Eng. 69: 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.05.008.
Zhang, J., and Y. Huo. 2009. “Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method.” Eng. Struct. 31 (8): 1648–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.017.
Zhang, J., K. Wei, and S. Qin. 2019a. “An efficient numerical model for hydrodynamic added mass of immersed column with arbitrary cross - Section.” Ocean Eng. 187: 106192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106192.
Zhang, J. R., K. Wei, Y. T. Pang, M. J. Zhang, and S. Q. Qin. 2019b. “Numerical investigation into hydrodynamic effects on the seismic response of complex hollow bridge pier submerged in reservoir: Case study.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (2): 05018016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001340.
Zheng, Y., and Y. Dong. 2019. “Performance-based assessment of bridges with steel-SMA reinforced piers in a life-cycle context by numerical approach.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (3): 1667–1688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0510-x.
Zheng, Y., Y. Dong, and Y. Li. 2018. “Resilience and life-cycle performance of smart bridges with shape memory alloy (SMA)-cable-based bearings.” Constr. Build. Mater. 158: 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.031.
Zhong, J., J.-S. Jeon, Y.-H. Shao, and L. Chen. 2019. “Optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of cable-stayed bridges subjected to pulse-like ground motions.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (2): 04018118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001329.
Zou, D., H. Han, J. Liu, D. Yang, and X. Kong. 2017. “Seismic failure analysis for a high concrete face rockfill dam subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 98: 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.031.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26Issue 3March 2021

History

Received: Aug 24, 2019
Accepted: Oct 1, 2020
Published online: Jan 12, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 12, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jiarui Zhang
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Bridge Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Bridge Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-9892. Email: [email protected]
Jingxi Qin
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles CA 90095.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share