Experimental Behavior of Pretensioned Bent Caps with Internal Voids for Weight Reduction
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 1
Abstract
Precast bent caps offer the opportunity to reduce onsite labor and materials and to accelerate the speed of construction. For many bridges, the weight is manageable for shipping and placement without the need for large cranes. For large bent caps, the weight can become a significant challenge for construction. Internal voids can be effective in reducing the weight but introduce the potential for the formation of shear cracks at service loads, because the shear width is smaller than in a solid bent cap. Internal voids are an attractive option when bent caps are pretensioned, because pretensioning delays the formation of cracks. This paper presents the results of a full-scale experimental test program that investigated the progression of damage and the failure mechanisms of pretensioned bent caps with internal voids. Test specimens were subassemblies of a portion of a multicolumn bent that included an overhang, a negative bending region at the connection to a column, and a positive bending region. The variables investigated were the presence of a void, the amount of prestressing, and the void termination location. Results indicated that voided caps had similar flexural behavior to solid caps, but were more prone to shear cracking and had more brittle failures. The use of a higher prestressing force was found to significantly delay flexural cracking but to have a minor effect on delaying the formation of shear cracks. The location of void termination adjacent to the connection region influenced the extent of the damage at failure.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data generated during the study are available in online repositories (Lee et al. 2018; McKee et al. 2018).
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by TxDOT under Project 0-6863. The authors wish to thank TxDOT personnel for assistance, including Darrin Jensen, Courtney Holle, Christopher Miller, Graham Bettis, Jason Tucker, Todd Speck, Manuel Pardon Jr., Susana Ceballos, Frank Estrada III, Dennis Johnson, and Roger Lopez. Bent caps were fabricated at Bexar Concrete Works in San Antonio, Texas; the assistance of Jorge Hinojosa and his staff are greatly appreciated. The authors would also like to thank the staff of the Texas A&M Structural and Materials Testing Laboratory and the many graduate and undergraduate students who assisted in the construction and testing of the bent caps, particularly Kevin J. Yole for his assistance with the design and construction of the experimental test program.
References
AASHTO. 2014. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 7th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ration of concrete in compression. ASTM C469/C469M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015a. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015b. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C496/C496M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Billington, S., R. Barnes, and J. Breen. 1998. A precast substructure design for standard bridge systems. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Birely, A. C., J. B. Mander, J. D. Lee, C. D. McKee, K. J. Yole, and U. R. Barooah. 2018. Precast, prestressed concrete bent caps: Volume 1 preliminary design considerations and experimental test program. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
Culmo, M. P. 2009. Connection details for prefabricated bridge elements and systems. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Ferguson, P. M. 1964. Design criteria for overhanging ends of bent caps-bond and shear. Austin, TX: Center of Highway Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Khaleghi, B., E. Schultz, S. J. Seguirant, M. L. Marsh, O. S. Haraldsson, M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2012. “Accelerated bridge construction in Washington state: From research to practice.” PCI J. 57 (4): 34–49. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09012012.34.49.
Lee, J. D., C. D. McKee, A. C. Birely, and J. B. Mander. 2018. TxDOT 0-6863: Pretensioned bent caps Phase 1 experimental data. College Station, TX: Texas Data Repository Dataverse, V2. https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/HXPWMG.
Matsumoto, E. E., M. C. Waggoner, G. Sumen, M. E. Kreger, S. L. Wood, and J. E. Breen. 2001. Development of a precast bent cap system. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, Texas Dept. of Transportation, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
McKee, C. D., J. D. Lee, A. C. Birely, and J. B. Mander. 2018. TxDOT 0-6863: Pretensioned bent caps Phase 2 experimental data. College Station, TX: Texas Data Repository Dataverse, V1. https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/CPNVA5.
O’Callagahan, M. R., and O. Bayrak. 2008. Tensile stresses in end regions of pretensioned I-beams at release. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
SHRP (Strategic Highway Research Program). 2013. Innovative bridge design for rapid renewal: ABC toolkit. Washington, DC: The Second Strategic Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
TxDOT (Texas Department of Transportation). 2014. TxDOT standard specifications for construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and bridges. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
TxDOT (Texas Department of Transportation). 2015. Bridge design manual—LRFD. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
WisDOT (Wisconsin Department of Transportation). 2014. Precast pier cap and column details. Madison, WI: Standard Detail Drawings Structures Development Section, State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation.
Young, B. S., J. M. Bracci, P. B. Keating, and M. B. D. Hueste. 2002. “Cracking in reinforced concrete bent caps.” ACI Struct. J. 99 (4): 488–498. https://doi.org/10.14359/12118.
Zhenqiang, L., and J. D. Leiva. 2010. “Pretensioned, precast concrete hollow-core units used for interchanged bridge project in Honduras.” PCI J. 55 (2): 71–81. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012010.71.81.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 26, 2018
Accepted: Dec 14, 2018
Published online: Oct 18, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Mar 18, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.