Technical Papers
Nov 7, 2014

Review of HL-93 Bridge Traffic Load Model Using an Extensive WIM Database

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 10

Abstract

HL-93, the current bridge traffic load model used in the United States is examined here. Weigh-in-motion (WIM) data from 17 sites in 16 states containing 74 million truck records are used to assess the level of consistency in the characteristic load effects (LEs) implied by the HL-93 model. The LEs of positive and negative bending moments and shear force are considered on single- and two-lane same-direction slab and girder bridges with a range of spans. It is found that the ratio of WIM-implied LE to HL-93 LE varies considerably from one LE to another. An alternative model is proposed that achieves improvements in consistency in this ratio for the LEs examined, especially for the single-lane case. The proposed model consists of a uniformly distributed load whose intensity varies with bridge length.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the FHWA’s Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program for access to an extensive WIM database and the Irish National Roads Authority for financial support.

References

AASHTO. (2012). LRFD bridge design specifications , 6th Ed., Washington, DC.
British Standards Institution. (2006). “Part 2: Steel, concrete and composite bridges. Specification for loads.” BS 5400-2:2006 , London.
Caprani, C. C., and OBrien, E. J. (2010). “The use of predictive likelihood to estimate the distribution of extreme bridge traffic load effect.” Struct. Saf. , 32(2), 138–144.
Caprani, C. C., OBrien, E. J., and McLachlan, G. J. (2008). “Characteristic traffic load effects from a mixture of loading events on short to medium span bridges.” Struct. Saf. , 30(5), 394–404.
Castillo, E. (1988). Extreme value theory in engineering , Academic Press, London.
Crespo-Minguillón, C., and Casas, J. R. (1997). “A comprehensive traffic load model for bridge safety checking.” Struct. Saf. , 19(4), 339–359.
Enright, B., and OBrien, E. J. (2011). “Cleaning weigh-in-motion data: Techniques and recommendations.” International Society for Weigh-in-Motion. 〈http://iswim.free.fr/doc/wim_data_cleaning_ie.pdf〉 (May 25, 2013).
Enright, B., and OBrien, E. J. (2013). “Monte Carlo simulation of extreme traffic loading on short and medium span bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. , 9(12), 1267–1282.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2003). “Actions on structures, Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges.” Eurocode 1 , Brussels, Belgium.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1995). Traffic monitoring guide , 3rd Ed., U.S. DOT, Washington, DC.
Fu, G., and You, J. (2011). “Truck load modeling and bridge code calibration.” Applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering , M. Faber, J. Kohler, and K. Nishijima, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 406–413.
Getachew, A., and OBrien, E. J. (2007). “Simplified site-specific traffic load models for bridge assessment.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. , 3(4), 303–311.
Highways Agency. (2001). “Section 4: Assessment, Part 3, BD 21/01, The assessment.” Design manual for roads and bridges: Highway structures: Inspection and maintenance , Vol. 3, London.
Highways Agency. (2011). “Section 4, Assessment, Part 19, BD 86/11, Highway structures: Inspection and maintenance. Assessment of highway bridges and structures for the effects of special types general order (STGO) and special order (SO) vehicles.” Design manual for roads and bridges: Highway structures: Inspection and maintenance , Vol. 3, London.
Kulicki, J. M., et al. (2007). “Updating the calibration report for AASHTO LRFD code.” NCHRP Rep. 20-7/186 , Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Leahy, C. (2013). “Using weight-in-motion data to predict extreme traffic loading on bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Miao, T. J., and Chan, T. H. T. (2002). “Bridge live load models from WIM data.” Eng. Struct. , 24(8), 1071–1084.
Moses, F. (2001). “Calibration of load factors for LRFR bridge evaluation.” NCHRP Rep. 454 , Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Nowak, A. S. (1993). “Live load model for highway bridges.” Struct. Saf. , 13(1–2), 53–66.
Nowak, A. S. (1999). “Calibration of LRFD bridge design code.” NCHRP Rep. 368 , Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Nowak, A. S., and Rakoczy, P. (2012). “WIM based simulation model of site specific live load effect on the bridges.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Weigh-in-Motion (ICWIM 6) , B. Jacob, A. M. McDonnell, F. Schmidt, and W. Cunagin, eds., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 352–358.
Nowak, A. S., and Szerszen, M. M. (1998). “Bridge load and resistance models.” Eng. Struct. , 20(11), 985–990.
OBrien, E. J., and Enright, B. (2011). “Modeling same-direction two-lane traffic for bridge loading.” Struct. Saf. , 33(4–5), 296–304.
OBrien, E. J., Enright, B., and Getachew, A. (2010). “Importance of the tail in truck weight modeling for bridge assessment.” J. Bridge Eng. , 210–213.
OBrien, E. J., Enright, B., and Leahy, C. (2013). “The effect of truck permitting policy on US bridge loading.” Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR 2013) , G. Geodatis, B. R. Ellingwood, and D. M. Frangopol, eds., ASCE, Reston, VA, 3761–3766.
OBrien, E. J., and Jehaes, S. (2002). “Weigh-in-motion of road vehicles.” Final Rep. B of the COST323 Action , Univ. Paris-Est, LCPC, Paris.
OBrien, E. J., and Keogh, D. L. (1999). Bridge deck analysis , CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
O’Connor, A., and Enevoldsen, I. (2009). “Probability-based assessment of highway bridges according to the new Danish guideline.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. , 5(2), 157–168.
O’Connor, A., Jacob, B., OBrien, E. J., and Prat, M. (2001). “Report of current studies performed on normal load model of EC1. Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges.” Rev. Fr. Génie Civil , 5(4), 411–433.
Schulman, J. F. (2003). Heavy truck weight and dimension limits in Canada , Railway Association of Canada, Toronto.
Sivakumar, B., Ghosn, M., and Moses, F. (2008). “Protocols for collecting and using traffic data in bridge design.” NCHRP Rep. 683 , Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
U.S. DOT. (2000). “Comprehensive truck size and weight study.” FHWA-PL-00-029 , Washington, DC.
Walker, D., and Cebon, D. (2012). “The metamorphosis of LTPP traffic data.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Weigh-in-Motion (ICWIM 6) , B. Jacob, A. M. McDonnell, F. Schmidt, and W. Cunagin, eds., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 242–249.
Walker, D., Selezneva, O., and Wolf, D. J. (2012). “Findings from LTPP SPS WIM systems validation study.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Weigh-in-Motion (ICWIM 6) , B. Jacob, A. M. McDonnell, F. Schmidt, and W. Cunagin, eds., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 214–221.
Zhao, J., and Tabatabai, H. (2012). “Evaluation of a permit vehicle model using weigh-in-motion truck records.” J. Bridge Eng. , 389–392.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 20Issue 10October 2015

History

Received: May 6, 2014
Accepted: Oct 14, 2014
Published online: Nov 7, 2014
Published in print: Oct 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Cathal Leahy [email protected]
Research Engineer, Roughan & O’Donovan Innovative Solutions, Arena House, Arena Rd., Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Eugene J. OBrien [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. College Dublin, Newstead, Dublin 4, Ireland. E-mail: [email protected]
Bernard Enright [email protected]
Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering, Dublin Institute of Technology, Bolton St., Dublin 1, Ireland. E-mail: [email protected]
Donya Hajializadeh [email protected]
Research Engineer, Roughan & O’Donovan Innovative Solutions, Arena House, Arena Rd., Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share