Technical Papers
Nov 4, 2014

Dynamic Assessment of Timber Railroad Bridges Using Displacements

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 10

Abstract

Infrastructure spending is such a large component of a railroad budget that it must be prioritized to meet the concurrent safety and line capacity requirements. Current bridge inspection and rating practices recommend observing bridge movements under a live load to help assess bridge conditions. However, measuring bridge movements under trains in the field is a challenging task. Even when they are measured, the relationships between bridge displacements and different loads/speeds are generally unknown. The research reported herein shows the effects of known train loadings, speeds, and traffic directions on the magnitude and frequency of displacements as measured on timber pile bents of a Class I railroad bridge. Researchers collected both vertical and transverse (lateral) displacements under revenue service traffic and work trains using LVDTs with a sampling frequency of 100 Hz. To investigate the effect of traffic on timber railroad bridges, displacements were measured under crossing events at different speeds and directions of a test train of known speed and weight provided by the railroad for the field experiment. The results indicate that bridge transverse displacements could help to capture critical changes in timber railroad bridge serviceability (i.e., ability to safely carry out railroad operations) as a function of railroad loading, speed, and direction.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial support for this research is gratefully acknowledged from the following sources: Association of American Railroads Technology Scanning Program; O. H. Ammann Research Fellowship of the Structural Engineering Institute—ASCE; Talentia Fellowship (Junta de Andalucía, Spain); and Illinois Graduate College Dissertation Travel Committee at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. The authors thank the Canadian National Railway (CN) bridge testing team for their support in the monitoring campaign of the U2.60 Bluford Bridge: Dave Roberts, Vamsi Tolikonda, and Zhenyu Zhao. The assistance and suggestions from Mark Paull from CN and Mike Dooley from ESCA Consultants are appreciated. Finally, Dan Painter (ROW Consultants) provided protection during the bridge monitoring.

References

American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA). (2008). AREMA bridge inspection handbook , Lanham, MD.
American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA). (2014a). “Rail.” Chapter 4, Manual for railway engineering , Vol. 1, Lanham, MD.
American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA). (2014b). “Timber structures.” Chapter 7, Manual for railway engineering , Vol. 2, Lanham, MD.
Armstrong, J. H. (2008). The railroad: What it is, what it does , Simmons-Boardman, Omaha, NE.
Association of American Railroads (AAR). (2014). “A short history of U.S. freight railroads.” 〈https://www.aar.org/BackgroundPapers/A%20Short%20History%20of%20US%20Freight%20Railroads.pdf#search=a%20short%20history%20of%20u%2Es%2E%20freight%20railroads〉 (Jun. 18, 2014).
Byers, W. G., and Otter, D. (2006). “Reducing the stress state of railway bridges with research: Researchers at TTCI stay on top of railway bridge research to ensure safety, cost effectiveness and maximum life cycle of materials.” Railway Track and Structures Rep. 1953 , Simmons-Boardman, Chicago.
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). (2005). “Safe placement of train cars: A report.” Rep. to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure , Washington, DC
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). (2008). “Railroad Bridge Working Group report to the Railroad Safety Advisory Committee.” Railroad Bridge Working Group Final Rep. , Washington, DC.
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). (2012). FRA guide to preparing accident/incident reports , 〈http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/OfficeofSafety/publicsite/downloads/appendixC-TrainaccidentCauseCodes.aspx?State=0〉 (Nov. 19, 2012).
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). (2014). “Part 213—Track safety standards.” Title 49: Transportation http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&rgn=div5&view=text&node=49:4.1.1.1.8&idno=49#49:4.1.1.1.8.3.5.3〉 (Aug. 26, 2014).
Frýba, L. (1996). Dynamics of railway bridges , Thomas Telford, London.
Frýba, L. (1999). Vibration of solids and structures under moving loads , Thomas Telford, London.
Gutkowski, R. M., Robinson, G., and Shigidi, A. (2001a). “Field load tests of open-deck timber trestle railroad bridges.” MPC Rep. No. 01-125 , Mountain Plains Consortium, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND.
Gutkowski, R. M., Shigidi, A. M. T., Tran, A., and Peterson, M. (2001b). “Field studies of strengthened timber railroad bridge.” Transportation Research Record 1770 , Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 139–148.
Hussain, S. M. A., Garg, V. K., and Singh, S. P. (1980). “Harmonic roll response of a railroad freight car.” J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. , 102(3), 282–288.
Moreu, F., et al. (2012a). “Reference-free displacement estimation for structural health monitoring of railroad bridges.” Proc., AREMA 2012 Annual Conf. and Exposition , American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA), Lanham, MD, 1–54.
Moreu, F., LaFave, J., and Spencer, B. (2012b). “Structural health monitoring of railroad bridges—Research needs and preliminary results.” Proc., Structures Congress 2012 , J. Carrato and J. Burns, eds., ASCE, Reston, VA, 2141–2152.
Moreu, F., and LaFave, J. M. (2012). “Current research topics: Railroad bridges and structural engineering.” Rep. No. NSEL-032 , Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Psimoulis, P. A., and Stiros, S. C. (2013). “Measuring deflections of a short-span railway bridge using a robotic total station.” J. Bridge Eng. , 182–185.
Scheffey, C. F. (1964). Dynamics of vehicle-structure interaction: Rapid transit structures , Bechtel, San Francisco.
Shust, W. C., and Iler, D. (2010). “Variability in natural frequencies of railroad freight car components.” Proc., 28th IMAC Conf. on Structural Dynamics , Springer, New York, 1273–1286.
Stiros, S., and Moschas, F. (2014). “Rapid decay of a timber footbridge and changes in its modal frequencies derived from multiannual lateral deflection measurements.” J. Bridge Eng. , 05014005.
Stiros, S. C., and Psimoulis, P. A. (2012). “Response of a historical short-span railway bridge to passing trains: 3-D deflections and dominant frequencies derived from robotic total station (RTS) measurements.” Eng. Struct. , 45(Dec), 362–371.
Tanabe, M., Yamada, Y., and Hajime, W. (1987). “Modal method for interaction of train and bridge.” Comput. Struct. , 27(1), 119–127.
Uppal, A. S. (1999). “Recent Research on Railroad Bridges and Their Components.” Proc., AREMA Annual Track and Structures Conf. , American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA), Lanham, MD, 1–51.
Uppal, A. S., and Rizkalla, S. H. (1988). “Response of timber bridges under train loading.” Transportation Research Record 1177 , Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 103–112.
Watco. (2012). “System special instructions.” 〈http://www.watcocompanies.com/safety/pdfs/2012%20Watco%20SSI%20Draft%20Final%2012-19-11.pdf〉 (Nov. 19, 2012).
Wipf, T. J., Ritter, M. A., and Wood, D. L. (2000). “Evaluation and field load testing of timber railroad bridge.” Proc., 5th Int. Bridge Engineering Conf. , National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 323–333.
Wolf, G. (2005). It takes three to rock and roll (causes and prevention of harmonic rock and roll) , Rail Sciences, Scottsdale, GA.
Wu, Y.-S., Yang, Y.-B., and Yau, J.-D. (2001). “Three-dimensional analysis of train-rail-bridge interaction problems.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. , 36(1), 1–35.
Xia, H., Guo, W. W., Wu, X., Pi, Y. L., and Bradford, M. A. (2008). “Lateral dynamic interaction analysis of a train–girder–pier system.” J. Sound Vib. , 318(4–5), 927–942.
Xia, H., Zhang, N., and Guo, W. W. (2006). “Analysis of resonance mechanism and conditions of train–bridge system.” J. Sound Vib. , 297(3–5), 810–822.
Yang, Y. B., Yau, J. D., and Wu, Y. S. (2004). Vehicle-bridge interaction dynamics with applications to high-speed railways , World Scientific, Singapore.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 20Issue 10October 2015

History

Received: Jun 26, 2014
Accepted: Oct 9, 2014
Published online: Nov 4, 2014
Published in print: Oct 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

F. Moreu, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 2152 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 205 N. Matthews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
H. Jo
Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics Dept., Univ. of Arizona, Civil Engineering Bldg., P.O. Box 210072, Tucson, AZ 85721.
J. Li, M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 2150 Learned Hall, 1530 W. 15th St., Lawrence, KS 66045.
R. E. Kim
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 2150 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 205 N. Matthews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801.
S. Cho
Research Assistant Professor, School of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, UNIST-gil 50, Eonyang-eup, Ulju-gun, Ulsan 689-798, South Korea.
A. Kimmle
Research Assistant, U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, 4003.07 Shake Table Laboratory, 2902 Newmark Dr., Champaign, IL 61826.
S. Scola
P.Eng.
Assistant Chief Engineer, Bridges and Structures, Canadian National Railway, 17641 Ashland Ave., Homewood, IL 60430.
H. Le
P.E.
System Engineer, Bridge Assessment, Canadian National Railway, 17641 Ashland Ave., Homewood, IL 60430.
B. F. Spencer Jr., F.ASCE
P.E.
Nathan M. and Anne M. Newmark Endowed Chair in Civil Engineering and Director, Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 2113 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 205 N. Matthews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801.
J. M. LaFave
P.E.
Professor and Civil & Environmental Engineering (CEE) Excellence Faculty Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 3110 Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, 205 N. Matthews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share