Technical Papers
Jul 19, 2018

Survey of Homeowners’ Motivations for the Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures: Evaluating a Holistic Energy Assessment Program

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 4

Abstract

Homeowners increasingly have the potential to drive deeper demand-side energy reductions, but they experience multifaceted barriers, from the financial to behavioral, which must be addressed holistically. Research has shown that targeting an individual barrier, such as rebates, is insufficient to overcome energy efficiency barriers for all homeowners. The National Energy Leadership Corps (NELC) was developed and implemented using consumer energy segmentations to holistically address the heterogeneous nature of homeowners’ behaviors and the varying motivators that drive energy investments. A survey of homeowners participating in the NELC program between 2012 and 2015 was designed and deployed, measuring adoption rates of recommended measures, homeowners’ perceptions of motivators, and the implementation of self-identified efficiency measures. The results of two-sample hypothesis tests revealed that homeowners’ perceived lack of skill may have potentially inhibited adoption of envelope and heating, ventilation and air conditioning measures, even though these measures were statistically indistinguishable from perceptions of cost savings and improved comfort (p-values less than 0.05). Further, a chi-square test of independence showed envelope improvements were correlated with homeowners’ budgets, time, information, and prioritization (p-value less than 0.05). In response, two recommendations are presented: (1) a policy for the standardization of publicly available energy conservation program reporting and (2) re-exploration of motivators and barriers for investment in energy efficiency.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Department of Energy Consortium for Building Energy Innovation, and the National Science Foundation, EFRI-SEED Grant 1038139. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We would also like to thank BNY Melon Foundation and our partners at the Penn State Center, Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, the Penn State GridSTAR Center, and numerous Pittsburgh community partners, including Kinglsey Association, Rebuilding Together Pittsburgh, Polish Hill Civic Association, and the Pittsburgh Urban Magnet Project for their support.

References

Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., and Rothengatter, T. (2005). “A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation.” J. Environ. Psychol., 25(3), 273–291.
Achtnicht, M., and Madlener, R. (2014). “Factors influencing German house owners’ preferences on energy retrofits.” Energy Policy, 68, 254–263.
Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., and Ford, N. (2005). “The household energy gap: Examining the divide between habitual- and purchase-related conservation behaviours.” Energy Policy, 33(11), 1425–1444.
Bruel, R., and Hoekstra, J. (2005). “How to stimulate owner-occupie to save energy.” ECEEE Summer Study Proc., Belambra Presqu’île de Giens, European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, France.
Energy Efficiency Improvement Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-11, 535 Stat. 182 (2015).
Energy Policy Act of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102–486, 1 Stat. 2777 (1992).
EPA. (2012). Energy Star® Products: 20 years of helping America save energy save money and protect the environment, Washington, DC.
Frondel, M., and Vance, C. (2013). “Heterogeneity in the effect of home energy audits: Theory and evidence.” Environ. Resour. Econ., 55(3), 407–418.
Fuller, M. C., Kunkel, C., Zimring, M., Hoffman, I. M., Soroye, K. L., and Goldman, C., (2010). “Driving demand for home energy improvements.” LBNL-3960E, Lawrence Berkeley Nat. Lab., Berkeley, CA.
Gamtessa, S. F. (2013). “An explanation of residential energy-efficiency retrofit behavior in Canada.” Energy Build., 57, 155–164.
Ingle, A., et al. (2012a), Behavioral Perspectives on Home Energy Audits: The Role of Auditors, Labels, Reports, and Audit Tools on Homeowner Decision Making. Report No. LBNL-5715E. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
Ingle, A., Moezzi, M., Lutzenhiser, L., and Diamond, R. (2012b). “How well do home energy audits serve the homeowner?” Proc., 2018 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC, 217–229.
Kastner, I., and Stern, P. C. (2015). “Examining the decision-making processes behind household energy investments: A review.” Energy Res. Social Sci., 10, 72–89.
Kelsey, J., and Pearson, D. (2011). “Update procedures for commercial building energy audits.” ASHRAE Trans., 117, 374.
Ketchman, K., Khanna, V., Riley, D., and Bilec, M. (2016). “Evaluation of a holistic energy assessment program.” Procedia Eng., 145, 468–475.
Krigger, J., and Dorsi, C. (2009). Residential energy: Cost savings and comfort for existing buildings, 5th ed. Saturn Resource Management, Helena, MT.
Krosnick, J. A., et al. (2002). “The impact of ‘no opinion’ response options on data quality: Non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice?” Public Opinion Q., 66(3), 371–403.
Martinsson, J., Lundqvist, L. J., and Sundström, A. (2011). “Energy saving in Swedish households. The (relative) importance of environmental attitudes.” Energy Policy, 39(9), 5182–5191.
Murphy, L. (2014). “The influence of energy audits on the energy efficiency investments of private owner-occupied households in the Netherlands.” Energy Policy, 65, 398–407.
Nair, G., Gustavsson, L., and Mahapatra, K. (2010). “Factors influencing energy efficiency investments in existing Swedish residential buildings.” Energy Policy, 38(6), 2956–2963.
National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987, Pub. L. No. 100–12, 101 Stat. 103 (1987).
Palmer, K., Walls, M., Gordon, H., and Gerarden, T. (2013). “Assessing the energy-efficiency information gap: Results from a survey of home energy auditors.” Energy Effic., 6(2), 271–292.
Qualtrics Research Software [Computer software]. Qualtrics, Provo, UT.
Riley, D. R., Whelton, M., Carlson, B., and Macht, K. (2012). “Process performance evaluation of home energy assessment procedures,” Building America NELC, 8–12.
Roberts, J. M. (2008). Igniting inspiration: A persuasion manual for visionaries, Booksurge Publishing, North Charleston, SC.
Shelton Group and Worldview Thinking. (2011). “Full spectrum insights: A new way to motivate sustainable behaviors.” Knoxville, TN.
Sprehn, K. A., Whelton, M. G., Riley, D. R., and Okudan-Kremer, G. E. (2015). “content analysis of home energy audit reports: Quantitative methodology for standardization.” J. Archit. Eng., B4015002.
Steg, L. (2008). “Promoting household energy conservation.” Energy Policy, 36(12), 4449–4453.
U.S. DOE. (2014). “Energy and cost savings calculators for energy-efficient products.” 〈http://energy.gov/eere/femp/energy-and-cost-savings-calculators-energy-efficient-products〉 (Jan 22, 2015).
U.S. EIA. (U.S. Energy Information Administration). (2009). “2009 Residential Energy Consumption Survey.” 〈http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2009/〉 (Jan 22, 2015).
U.S. EIA. (U.S. Energy Information Administration). (2012). Annual Energy Review 2011. Report No. DOE/EIA-0384(2011). U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
Wilson, C., Crane, L., and Chryssochoidis, G. (2015). “Why do homeowners renovate energy efficiently? Contrasting perspectives and implications for policy.” Energy Res. Social Sci., 7, 12–22.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 24Issue 4December 2018

History

Received: May 30, 2017
Accepted: Dec 8, 2017
Published online: Jul 19, 2018
Published in print: Dec 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Dec 19, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Pittsburgh, 742 Benedum Hall, 3700 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5342-9546
David R. Riley
Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., 104 Engineering Unit A, University Park, PA, 16802.
Vikas Khanna
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Pittsburgh, 742 Benedum Hall, 3700 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261.
Melissa M. Bilec, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Pittsburgh, 153 Benedum Hall, 3700 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share