Pilot-Scale Electrokinetic Cleanup of Lead-Contaminated Soils
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 3
Abstract
The results of two pilot-scale experiments on enhanced electrokinetic extraction of lead from contaminated soil samples collected from a military Small Arms Training Facility are presented. The tests were conducted using two boxes with electrode spacing of (Box 1) and (Box 2). The soil was formed of a sandy layer on top of a clayey sand layer. The soil contained bullet fragments and the mean initial lead concentration in the minus soil fraction was and in the sand and clayey sand layers, respectively. A current density of was used in both tests and was doubled after 112 days of processing. organic acid was used to maintain the catholyte pH between 4 and 5. Box 1 and Box 2 were processed for 9 months and 11 months, respectively. The results showed that organic acid amendment at the cathode reduced the voltage and energy requirement by 70% and enhanced lead extraction. Lead transport showed a delay of about 14 days in the initial transport front development. For the conditions described in this study, the reactive rate of lead transport by ion migration and electroosmosis was under , which is less than 10% of the theoretical nonreactive value. There was a minimum limit for lead extraction from the soil by electrokinetics. Final lead concentrations in the treated sections were around in the sand and in the clayey sand. The results represent a reduced lead concentration by 85% in the sand and by 70% in the clayey sand. Complete breakthrough of lead did not occur due to accumulation near the cathode, even though catholyte pH was 4 to 5. A transverse upward transport and accumulation of lead at the soil surface was observed in both tests. Treatment duration of 9 months was adequate for Box 1, while 11 months of processing was not enough for Box 2 to bring the total lead concentration to below across the soil. Electrical energy cost for the process was between and per cubic meter per month.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgment
The experiments described in this paper were conducted by the Environmental Laboratory of ERDC and Electrokinetics Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The study was conducted under the Installation Restoration Research Program (IRRP). Dr. John Cullinane served as the program director at ERDC during the period of this study. The assessment and views presented in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors or the agencies/institutions that the authors represent.
References
Acar, Y. B., Gale, R. J., Putnam, G., and Hamed, J. T. (1989). “Electrochemical processing of soils: Its potential use in environmental geotechnology and significance of ph gradients.” Proc., 2nd Int. Symposium on Environmental Geotechnology, Envo Publishing, Bethlehem, Pa., 1, 25–38.
Acar, Y. B., and Alshawabkeh, A. (1993). “Principles of electrokinetic remediation.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 27(13), 2638–2647.
Acar, Y., Hamed, J., Alshawabkeh, A., and Gale, R. (1994). “Cadmium removal from saturated kaolinite by application of electrical current.” Geotechnique, 44(3), 239–669.
Acar, Y. B., and Alshawabkeh, A. N. (1996). “Electrokinetic remediation I: Pilot-scale tests with lead-spiked kaolinite.” J. Geotech. Eng., 122(3), 173–185.
Alshawabkeh, A. N., and Acar, Y. B. (1992). “Removal of contaminants from soils by electrokinetics: A theoretical treatise.” J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 27(7), 1835–1861.
Alshawabkeh, A. N., and Acar, Y. B. (1996). “Electrokinetic remediation II: Theoretical model.” J. Geotech. Eng., 122(3), 186–196.
Alshawabkeh, A. N., Puppala, S., Acar, Y. B., Gale, R., and Bricka, R. M. (1997). “Effect of solubility on enhanced electrokinetic extraction of metals.” Proc., In Situ Remediation of the Geoenvironment Geotechnical Special Publication No. 71, Reston, Va., 532–544.
Alshawabkeh, A. N., Yeung, A. T., Bricka, R. M. (1999a). “Practical aspects of in-situ electrokinetic extraction.” J. Environ. Eng., 125(1), 27–35.
Alshawabkeh, A. N., Gale, R. J., Ozsu-Acar, E., and Bricka, R. M. (1999b). “Optimization of 2D electrode configuration for electrokinetic remediation.” J. Soil Contaminat., 8(6), 617–635.
Alshawabkeh, A. N., Sheahan, T. C., and Wu, X. (2004). “The effects of dc field application on soft soil properties.” J. Mech. Mater., 36, 453–465.
ASTM. (1991). Annual book of ASTM standards: Construction, American Society for Testing and Materials, Vol. 4.08, Soil and rock; Building stone; Geotextiles, Philadelphia.
Cox, C. D., Shoesmith, M. A., and Ghosh, M. M. (1996). “Electrokinetic remediation of mercury-contaminated soils using iodine/iodide lixivant.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 30(6), 1933–1938.
EPA. (1992). “Inductively coupled plasma—Atomic emission spectroscopy.” Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-846), Method 9056, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
EPA. (1995). “In situ remediation technologies: Electrokinetics.” Rep. No. EPA542-K-94-007, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Technology Innovation Office, Washington, D.C.
Eykholt, G. R. (1992). “Driving and complicating features of the electrokinetic treatment of contaminated soils.” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering. Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
Eykholt, G. R. (1997). “Development of pore pressures by nonuniform electroosmosis in clay.” J. Hazard. Mater., 55(1–3), 171–186.
Eykholt, J., and Daniel, D. E. (1994). “Impact of system chemistry on electro-osmosis in contaminated soil.” J. Geotech. Eng., 120(5), 797–815.
Hamed, J., Acar, Y. B., and Gale, R. J. (1991). “Pb(II) removal from kaolinite using electrokinetics.” J. Geotech. Eng., 117(2), 241–271.
Hicks, R. E., and Tondorf, S. (1994). “Electrorestoration of metal contaminated soils.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 28(12), 2203–2210.
Ho, S. V., et al. (1999). “The Lasagna technology for in situ soil remediation. II: Large field test.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 33(7), 1092–1099.
Lageman, R. (1993). “Electro-reclamation.” J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 61.27(13), 2648–2650.
Lageman, R., Wieberen, P., and Seffinga, G. (1989). “Theory and practice of electro-reclamation, NATA/CCMS Pilot Study.” Demonstration of Removal Action Technologies for Contaminated Land and Groundwater, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pamukcu, S., and Wittle, J. K. (1992). “Electrokinetic removal of selected heavy metals from soil.” Environ. Prog., 11(3), 241–250.
Puppala, S., Alshawabkeh, A. N., Acar, Y. B., Gale, R. J., and Bricka, R. M. (1997). “Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of high sorption capacity soils.” J. Hazard. Mater., 55(1–3), 203–220.
Reddy, K. R., Xu, C. Y., and Chinthamreddy, S. (2001). “Assessment of electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from soils by sequential extraction analysis,” J. Hazard. Mater., 84(2–3), 85–109.
Reddy, K. R., and Chinthamreddy, S. (2003). “Sequentially enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals in low buffering clayey soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 129(3), 263–277.
Runnells, D. D., and Larson, J. L. (1986). “A laboratory study of electromigration as possible field technique for the removal of contaminants from groundwater.” Ground Water Monit. Rev., 6(3), 85–91.
Runnells, D. D., and Wahli, C. (1993). “In situ electromigration as a method for removing sulfate, metals, and other contaminants from groundwater.” Ground Water Monit. Rem., 13(1), 121–129.
Wong, J. S., Hicks, R. E., and Probstein, R. F. (1997). “ EDTA-enhanced electroremediation of metal contaminated soils.” J. Hazard. Mater., 55(1–3), 61–79.
Yeung, A., Hsu, C., and Menon, R. (1996). “EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction of lead.” J. Geotech. Eng., 122(8), 666–673.
Lindgren, E. R., Hankins, M. G., Mattson, E. D., and Duda, P. M. (1998). “Electrokinetic demonstration at the unlined chromic acid pit.” Report Abstract. SAND97-2592, Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, N.M.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 131 • Issue 3 • March 2005
Pages: 283 - 291
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 25, 2003
Accepted: Apr 12, 2004
Published online: Mar 1, 2005
Published in print: Mar 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.