TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 15, 2002

Evaluating Site Investigation Quality using GIS and Geostatistics

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 128, Issue 6

Abstract

Current practice in the characterization of subsurface conditions usually involves the interpretation of data from laboratory and in-situ tests using deterministic analysis methods. These deterministic methods do not reflect the uncertainty inherently associated with the estimation of geotechnical parameters. In addition there are no commonly accepted methods for evaluation of the quality of the investigation or estimation of the impact of additional sampling in a quantitative manner. In this paper the development and implementation of a performance-based investigation and monitoring approach for assessing the quality, or thoroughness, of site investigation and monitoring activities in a quantitative, spatially sensitive manner is described. Thoroughness images are based on probability values generated using geostatistics and are designed to enable users to better assess the likelihood that design or regulatory criteria will be satisfied. This approach has been implemented within a geographic information system and was evaluated using an existing geotechnical data set.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1995). “Standard test method for penetration test and split-barrel sampling of soils.” D 1586-84, Vol. 4.08, Sec. 4, 129–133, Philadelphia.
Association of Soil and Foundation Engineers (ASFE). (1990). The real world of engineering: Case histories 1–40, J. P. Bachner, ed., ASFE, Silver Spring, Md.
Carroll, D. P. (1998). “Development of a GIS extension for liquefaction hazard analysis.” MS thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta.
Cromer, M. V. (1996). “Geostatistics for environmental and geotechnical applications: A technology transferred. Geostatistics for environmental and geotechnical applications.” ASTM STP 1283, 3–12.
Englund, E., and Sparks, A. (1991). “Geo-EAS 1.2.1 user’s guide.” Rep. No. EPA-600/8-91/008, EPA–EMSL, Las Vegas.
Fenton, G. A. (1997). “Data analysis/geostatistics,” Probabilistic methods in geotechnical engineering, G. A. Fenton, ed., ASCE Geotechnical Safety and Reliability Committee.
Geomatrix Consultants. (1990). “Evaluation of the interior area performance, Naval Station, Treasure Island, San Francisco, California.” Vols. 1, 4, and 5 of a report (Project No. 1539.05) prepared for the U.S. Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Western Division, San Bruno, Calif.
Goovaerts, P.(1998). “Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physio-chemical soil properties.” Biol. Fertility Soils, 27(4), 315–334.
Honjo, Y., and Kuroda, K.(1991). “A new look at fluctuating geotechnical data for reliability design, soils and foundations.” Jpn. Soc. Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 31(1), 110–120.
Isaaks, E. H., and Srivastava, R. M. (1989). An introduction to applied geostatistics, Oxford University Press, New York.
Journel, A. G., and Huijbregts, Ch. J. (1978). Mining geostatistics, Academic, San Diego.
Legget, R. F.(1979). “Geology and Geotechnical Engineering.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 105(GT3), 342–391.
Leone, D., and Schofield, N. (1996). “Evaluation of a soil contaminated site and cleanup criteria: A geostatistical approach, geostatistics for environmental and geotechnical applications.” ASTM STP 1283, 133–145.
Liao, S. C., and Whitman, R. V.(1986). “Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand.” J. Geotech. Eng., 112(3), 373–377.
Luna, R. (1995). “Liquefaction evaluation using a spatial analysis system,” PhD thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Georgia Inst. Technology, Atlanta.
Myers, J. C. (1997). Geostatistical error management, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Parsons, R. L., and Frost, J. D.(2000). “Interactive analysis of spatial data using a GIS-based tool.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 14(4), 215–222.
Parsons, R. L., Frost, J. D., Chameau, J.-L. A., and Tsai, Y. C. (1998). GIS-ASSESS: A spatial analysis tool for site investigation planning and evaluation. Geotechnical site characterization, P. K. Robertson, and P. W. Mayne, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 251–256.
Power, M. S., Egan, J. A., Shewbridge, S. E., de Becker J., and Faris, J. R. (1998). Analysis of liquefaction-induced damage on Treasure Island, the Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989–Liquefaction, U.S.G.S. Survey Professional Paper No. 1551-B, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., B87–B119.
Rouhani, S. (1996). “Geostatistical estimation: Kriging, geostatistics for environmental and geotechnical applications.” ASTM STP 1283, 20–31.
Rouhani, S., and Hall, T. J. (1987). “Optimal schemes for groundwater quality monitoring in the shallow aquifer, Dougherty Plain, Southwestern Georgia.” Rep. No. ERC 03-87, Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M.(1971). “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 97(9), 1249–1274.
Seed, H. B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L. F., and Chung, R. M.(1985). “Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations.” J. Geotech. Eng., 111(12), 1425–1445.
Skempton, A. W.(1986). “Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, aging and overconsolidation.” Geotechnique, 36(3), 425–447.
Smith, M. L. and Williams, R. E. (1996). “Indicator kriging for selective remediation.” Engineering Geology, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 43, 23–30.
Soulié, M., Montres, P., and Sivestri, V.(1990). “Modeling spatial variability of soil parameters.” Can. Geotech. J., 27, 617–630.
Tsai, Y. C., and Frost, J. D. (1996a). “A spatial thoroughness quantification system for environmental site characterization.” Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Environmental Geotechnology, Technomic, Lancaster, Pa., 967–976.
Tsai, Y. C., and Frost, J. D. (1996b). “Reducing uncertainty in environmental site characterizations, uncertainty in the geological environment: From theory to practice.” GSP 58, ASCE, New York, 2, 1019–1033.
Tsai, Y. C., and Frost, J. D.(1999). “Using geographic information system and knowledge base system technology for real-time planning of site characterization activities.” Can. Geotech. J., 36, 300–312.
Wild, M. R., and Rouhani, S. (1996). “Effective use of field screening techniques in environmental and geotechnical applications. Geostatistics for environmental and geotechnical applications.” ASTM STP 1283, 88–101.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 128Issue 6June 2002
Pages: 451 - 461

History

Received: Jun 22, 2000
Accepted: Nov 27, 2001
Published online: May 15, 2002
Published in print: Jun 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

R. L. Parsons, M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045.
J. D. Frost, M.ASCE
Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share