TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 1, 2007

Valuing Simple Multiple-Exercise Real Options in Infrastructure Projects

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 13, Issue 2

Abstract

The revenue risk is considerable in infrastructure project financing arrangements such as build–operate–transfer (BOT). A potential mitigation strategy for the revenue risk is a governmental revenue guarantee, where the government secures a minimum amount of revenue for a project. Such a guarantee is: (1) only redeemable at distinct points in time; and (2) more economical if the government limits the guarantee’s availability to the early portions of a BOT’s concession period. Hence, a guarantee characterized by this type of structure takes the form of either a Bermudan or a simple multiple-exercise real option, depending upon the number of exercise opportunities afforded. The multi-least-squares Monte Carlo technique is presented and illustrated as a promising approach to determine the fair value of this variety of real option. This method is far more flexible than prevailing approaches, so it represents an important step toward improving risk mitigation and facilitating contractual and financial negotiations in BOT projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by Grant No. NSFCMS-0408988 from the National Science Foundation, whose support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

Amram, M., and Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Real options: Managing strategic investment in an uncertain world, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Andersen, L. A. (2000). “A simple approach to the pricing of Bermudan swaptions in the multifactor LIBOR market model.” J. Comput. Finance, 3(2), 5–32.
Black, F., and Scholes, M. (1973). “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.” J. Polit. Econ., 81, 637–659.
Broadie, M., and Glasserman, P. (1997). “Pricing American-style securities using simulation.” J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 21(8), 1323–1352.
Chiara, N. (2006). “Real options methods for improving economic risk management in infrastructure project finance.” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia Univ., New York.
Clement, D. L. E., and Protter, P. (2002). “An analysis of a least squares regression method for American option pricing.” Finance Stoch., 6(4), 449–471.
Copeland, T. E., and Antikarov, V. (2001). Real options: A practitioner’s guide, Texere, New York.
Dailami, M., Lipkovich, I., and Van Dyck, J. (1999). “INFRISK: A computer simulation approach to risk management in infrastructure project finance transactions.” Paper No. 2083, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
de Neufville, R., Scholtes, S., and Wang, T. (2006). “Real options by spreadsheet: Parking garage case example.” 12(2), 107–111.
Dixit, A. K., and Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Esty, B. C. (1999). “Improved techniques for valuing large-scale projects.” J. Project Finance, 5(1), 9–25.
Esty, B. C. (2003). Modern project finance: A casebook, Wiley, New York.
Ford, D. N., Lander, D. M., and Voyer, J. J. (2002). “A real options approach to valuing strategic flexibility in uncertain construction projects.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 20(4), 343–351.
Gamba, A. (2003). “Real options: A Monte Carlo approach.” Working papers, Dept. of Economics, Univ. of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Garvin, M. J., and Cheah, Y. J. (2004). “Valuation techniques for infrastructure investment decisions.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 22(5), 373–383.
Haugh, M. B. (2003). “Duality theory and simulation in financial engineering.” Proc., 2003 Winter Simulation Conf., New Orleans.
Ho, S., and Liu, L. Y. (2002). “An option pricing-based model for evaluating the financial viability of privatized infrastructure projects.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 20(2), 143–156.
Irwin, T. (2003). “Public money for private infrastructure.” Paper no. 26601, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Jaillet, P., Ronn, E. I., and Tompaidis, S. (2004). “Valuation of commodity-based swing options.” Manage. Sci., 50(7), 909–921.
Longstaff, F. A., and Schwartz, E. S. (2001). “Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach.” Rev. Financ. Stud., 14(1), 113–147.
Meinshausen, N., and Hambly, B. M. (2004). “Monte Carlo methods for the valuation of multi-exercise options.” Math. Finance, 14(4), 557–583.
Merton, R. C. (1973). “Theory of rational option pricing.” Bell J. Economics and Management, 4, 141–183.
Moreno, M., and Navas, J. F. (2003). “On the robustness of least-squares Monte Carlo (LSM) for pricing American derivatives.” J. Project Finance, 6(2), 107–128.
Myers, S. (1977). “Determinants of corporate borrowing.” J. Financ. Econ., 5(1), 147–175.
Powell, W. B. (2005). Approximate dynamic programming for operations research, http://www.castlelab.princeton.edu (Aug. 29, 2005).
Reinhardt, W. (2004). “State legislative scorecard: Enabling laws for transportation partnerships.” Public Works Financing, 186, 7.
Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Wang, T., and de Neufvillee, R. (2005). “Real options ‘in’ projects.” http://realoptions.org/papers2005/Tao_Wang_RO_in_projects.pdf (Aug. 8, 2005).
Yescombe, E. R. (2002). Principles of project finance, Academic, San Diego.
Zhao, T., Sundararajan, S. K., and Tseng, C. L. (2004). “Highway development decision-making under uncertainty: A real options approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 10(1), 23–32.
Zhao, T., and Tseng, C. L. (2003). “Valuing flexibility in infrastructure expansion.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(3), 89–97.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 13Issue 2June 2007
Pages: 97 - 104

History

Received: Nov 4, 2005
Accepted: Jul 24, 2006
Published online: Jun 1, 2007
Published in print: Jun 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nicola Chiara
S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia Univ., New York, NY 10027. E-mail: [email protected]
Michael J. Garvin
M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, School of Construction, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0105 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected].
Jan Vecer
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Statistics, Columbia Univ., New York, NY 10027. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share