TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 15, 2002

Prioritization of Schedule Dependencies in Hurricane Recovery of Transportation Agency

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 8, Issue 3

Abstract

A transportation agency must consider the efficiency of its hurricane preparedness, response, and recovery operations. This paper develops and demonstrates a methodology to identify and characterize the schedule dependencies and subsequent delays that arise among federal, state, and local agencies and organizations involved in the pre and posthurricane processes in order to reduce the time for a region to recover from a natural disaster. The large scale of an agency’s overall recovery from a natural disaster presents a challenge to conventional scheduling models, including program evaluation and review technique and critical-path methods. A metanalysis to support agency resource allocation is thus developed as follows. Instances of schedule dependencies from past recoveries are collected and categorized according to the functional and organizational units of the agency. A categorical study is performed to highlight the functional units that are associated with the greater numbers of dependencies. The agency better understands which units need attention and which interfaces among units need improved coordination. The results of an example show that the interfaces of the Information Management unit and the Operations unit are sources of a significant portion of the dependency scenarios collected. The significance of the dependencies to the overall recovery is characterized in a multiattribute analysis. The analysis expresses the magnitude of a dependency in terms of its controllability, the involved agencies, resources involved, prevalence of similar scenarios, cascading effects, maturity, likelihood in the future, and severity in terms of its time duration. A transportation agency can use the developed methodology to identify, prioritize, and minimize the negative effects of schedule dependencies within and among agencies in recovery from a regionwide disaster. Recommendations are given to improve higher-level coordination both among the involved agencies and within the transportation agency.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ardekani, S. A.(1992). “Transportation operations following the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake.” Transp. Q., 46(2), 219–233.
Babcock, D. (1999). Managing engineering and technology, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Barnett, J. M.(1987). “Police perspective on traffic management of freeway emergencies.” Transp. Res. Circ., 326, 26–30.
Boyd, M. A., Maier, M. P., and Caton, J. E. (1998). “Critical incident management guidelines.” Rep. No. FTA-MA-26-7009-98-1, DOT- VNTSC-FTA-98-5, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C.
Bubshait, A., and Cunningham, M.(1998). “Comparison of delay analysis methodologies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(4), 315–322.
Chang, S., and Shinozuka, M.(1996). “Life-cycle cost analysis with natural hazard risk.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 2(3), 118–126.
Chowdhury, M., Garber, N., and Li, D.(2000). “Multiobjective methodology for highway safety resource allocation.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 6(4), 138–144.
Crichlow, D. (1997). “Taking a comprehensive approach to handling disasters.” American City and County, Intertec, 112(6).
Ezell, B., and Farr, J.(2000). “Infrastructure risk analysis model.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 6(3), 114–117.
Gharaibeh, H., and Darter, M.(1999). “Development of prototype highway asset management system.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 5(2), 61–68.
Grajek, K., and Gibson, G.(2000). “Partnered project performance in Texas Department of Transportation.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 6(2), 73–79.
Gunes, A., and Kovel, J.(2000). “Using GIS in emergency management operations.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 126(3), 136–149.
Haimes, Y., and Jiang, P.(2001). “Leontief-based model of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 7(1), 1–12.
Hancock, K., Abkowitz, M., and Lepofsky, M. (1993). “Assessing hazardous materials emergency response capability: methodological development and application.” Transportation Research Record 1383, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 67–76.
Hastak, M., and Baim, E.(2001). “Risk factors affecting management and maintenance cost of urban infrastructure.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 7(2), 67–76.
Heaney, J., Peterka, J., and Wright, L.(2000). “Research needs for engineering aspects of natural disasters.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 6(1), 4–14.
Hecker, E., Irwin, W., Cottrell, D., and Bruzewicz, A.(2000). “Strategies for improving response and recovery in the future.” Natural Haz. Rev., 1(3), 161–170.
Higgins, L. L., Hickman, M. D., and Weatherby, C. A. (2000). “Emergency management for public transportation systems: research report (tasks 3 and 4).” Rep. No. FHWA/TX-01/1834-3, Res. Rept. 1834-3, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Hooke, W.(2000). “U.S. participation in international decade for natural disaster reduction.” Natural Haz. Rev., 1(1), 2–9.
Housner, G., and Chung, R., eds. (1997). “Natural disaster reduction.” Proc., Conf., Dec. 3–7, 1996, ASCE, 0-7844-0153-5, ASCE, New York.
Juhl, G. (1993). “FEMA develops prototype disaster planning and response system.” American City and County, 108(3).
Kovel, J.(2000). “Modeling disaster response planning.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 126(1), 26–38.
Kovel, J., and Kangari, R.(1995). “Planning for disaster-relief construction.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 121(4), 207–215.
Kozin, F., and Zhou, H.(1990). “System study of urban response and reconstruction due to earthquake.” J. Eng. Mech., 116(9), 1959–1972.
Lambert, J. H., Haimes, Y. Y., Li, D., Schooff, R., and Tulsiani, V.(2001). “Identification, ranking, and management of risks in a major system acquisition.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 72(3), 315–325.
Masri, A., and Moore, J.(1995). “Integrated planning information systems: disaster planning analysis.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 121(1), 19–39.
McGough, E.(1982). “Scheduling: effective methods and techniques.” J. Constr. Div., 108(1), 75–84.
Mondul, S. (1997). “ITS: transportation and communications in service to multi-agency emergency response.” Proc., 7th Annual ITS America Meeting and Exposition, Merging the transportation and communications revolutions, ITS America, Washington, D.C.
Mulholland, B., and Christian, J.(1999). “Risk assessment in construction schedules.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(1), 8–15.
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). (2000). “Hurricane Floyd lessons learned.” 〈http://www.dot.state.nc.us/news/FloydLessons〉, November.
Parentela, E. M., and Nambisan, S. S. (2000). Emergency response (disaster management), S. Easa and Y. Chan, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va., 181–196.
Peer, S.(1974). “Network analysis and construction planning.” J. Constr. Div., 100(3), 203–210.
Permanent International Association of Road Congresses. (1999). “Natural disaster reduction: introductory report.” Rep. No. 21.72.B, 21st World Road Congress Conf., Malaysia.
Ross, C. L. (1988). “Impact assessment of natural disasters on transportation lifelines.” Rep. No. NSF/ENG-88033, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Schiff, A., ed. (1995). “Northridge Earthquake: lifeline performance and post-earthquake response.” Tech. Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, 0-7844-0106-3, Monograph No. 8., ASCE, New York.
Staneff, S., Ibbs, C., and Bea, R.(1995). “Risk-management system for infrastructure-condition assessment.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 1(4), 221–229.
Tavano, M. J. (1995). “The big one: Hurricane Andrew.” 1995 Int. Conf. Technology Tools for Transportation Professionals—Moving into the 21st Century, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Fort Lauderdale, Fla. 212–221.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (1984). “Benefits of advance planning to meet transportation emergencies.” Transp. Res. Circ., 280.
Ullman, G. L., Trout, N. D., and Urbanik, T. (1991). “Synthesis of traffic management for major emergencies, interim report.” Rep. No. FHWA/TX-91/1231-1, Res. Rept. 1231-1, TT1: 2-18-90-1231, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). (1997). Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency Operations Plan: Transportation Plan, Richmond, Va.
Wang, W., and Demsetz, L.(2000). “Application example for evaluating networks considering correlation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(6), 467–474.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 8Issue 3September 2002
Pages: 103 - 111

History

Received: Oct 1, 2001
Accepted: May 6, 2002
Published online: Aug 15, 2002
Published in print: Sep 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

James H. Lambert
Associate Director and Research Assistant Professor, Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems and Dept. of Systems and Information Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903.
Clare E. Patterson
Student, Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems and Dept. of Systems and Information Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share