TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jan 1, 2008

Developing a State-of-the-Art Facility to Support Construction Research and Education: A Case Study

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 134, Issue 1

Abstract

The University of Washington’s Department of Construction Management is in the process of developing interdisciplinary research and experiential education in construction engineering and management (CEM) with the creation of the 28,000ft2 Pacific Northwest Center for construction research and education (PNCCRE). In doing so, the department has identified challenges, limitations, and issues centered on bringing industry experience into the classroom and bringing researchers together from diverse disciplines from across the university. The University of Washington envisions the PNCCRE as a place where learners will experience CEM theory and skills firsthand in an interdisciplinary research environment that will foster innovation. This paper focuses on how the Department of Construction Management at the University of Washington is reenvisioning its research and education activities to take advantage of the new PNCCRE facility. In the education front, this paper introduces “the experience learning model,” a new paradigm to support active contextual learning in CEM. In the research context, this paper presents the “interdisciplinary research model,” a new approach to encourage collaborations, as well as appropriate organizational systems and work processes to support researchers and educators with diverse backgrounds, as they work together on mutually intersecting problems. The writers do not see these two models as separate endeavors, but as a coupled program, such that research informs the educational setting, and educational experiences inform research. The writers envision the PNCCRE fulfilling the needs of educators and students, researchers and practitioners, as well as the greater communities of industry and academia, by bringing together interdisciplinary teams to tackle the complex problems we face in CEM—a center where experience fosters curiosity, interdisciplinary collaboration broadens experience, and synergy creates a whirlwind of innovation and education.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., and Squire, K. (2001). “Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices.” Cogn. Instruct., 19(1), 47–94.
Catalano, G. D., and Catalano, K. (1999). “Transformation: From teacher-centered to student-centered engineering education.” J. Eng. Educ., 88(1), 59–64.
Chi, M., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., and Glaser, R. (1989). “Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems.” Cogn. Sci., 13(2), 145–182.
Chinowsky, P., and Vanegas, J. (1996). “Combining practice and theory in construction education curricula.” Proc., Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Engineering Committee on Science and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research, National Academics Press, Washington, D.C.
Feisel, L. D., and Rosa, A. J. (2005). “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education.” J. Eng. Educ., 94(1), 121–130.
Felder, R. M., and Brent, R. (2005). “Understanding student differences.” J. Eng. Educ., 94(1), 121–130.
Finelli, C. J., Klinger, A., and Budny, D. D. (2001). “Strategies for improving the classroom environment.” J. Eng. Educ., 90(4), 491–497.
Forrester, J. W. (1991). “System dynamics and the lessons of 35 years.” The systemic basis for policy making in the 1990s, K. B. DeGreen, ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Gregorian, V. (2004). “Colleges must reconstruct the unity of knowledge.” Chronicle Higher Educ., 50(39), B12–B14.
Huy, Q. N., and Mitzberg, H. (2003). “The rhythm of change.” Sloan Manage. Rev., 44(4), 79–84.
Kanfer, A. G., et al. (2000). “Modeling distributed knowledge processes in next generation multidisciplinary alliances.” Information Systems Frontiers, 2(3), 317–331.
Klukken, P. G., Parsons, J. R., and Columbus, P. J. (1997). “The creative experience in engineering practice: Implications for engineering education.” J. Eng. Educ., 86(2), 133–138.
Kulonda, D. J. (2001). “Case learning methodology in operations engineering.” J. Eng. Educ., 90(3), 299–303.
McCabe, B., Ching, K. S., and Rodrigues, S. (2000). “STRATEGY: A construction simulation environment.” Proc., 6th Construction Congress, ASCE, Orlando, Fla., 115–120.
Mukherjee, A., Rojas, E. M., and Winn, W. D. (2005). “Understanding cognitive and metacognitive processes in construction management: The system dynamics perspective.” Proc., 2005 Construction Research Congress, ASCE, San Diego.
O’Brien, W. J. (2000). “Implementation issues in project web-sites: A practitioner’s viewpoint.” J. Manage. Eng., 16(3), 34–39.
Pfirman, S. L., Collins, J., Lowes, S., and Michaels, A. F. (2005). “Collaborative efforts: Promoting interdisciplinary scholars.” Chronicle Higher Educ., 51(23), B15–16.
Rhoten, D. (2003). “A multi-method analysis of the social and technical conditions for interdisciplinary collaboration.” NSF Rep., The Hybrid Vigor Institute, San Francisco.
Rhoten, D. (2004). “Interdisciplinary research: Trend or transition.” Items and Issues, Social Science Research Council Quarterly, 5(1–2), 6–11.
Rojas, E. M., and Mukherjee, A. (2003). “Modeling the construction management process to support situational simulations.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 17(4), 273–280.
Rojas, E. M., and Songer, A. D. (1999). “Web-centric systems: A new paradigm for collaborative engineering.” J. Manage. Eng., 15(1), 39–45.
Russo, J. E., and Schoemaker, P. (1989). Decision traps: Ten barriers to brilliant decision-making and how to overcome them, 1st Ed., Doubleday/Currency, New York.
Sawhney, A., Mund, A., and Koczenasz, J. (2001). “Internet-based interactive construction management learning system.” J. Construction Education, 6(3), 124–138.
Sutherland, I. (1996). “Technology and courage.” Perspectives 96-1 in an essay series, SunLabs, April.
Winn, W. (2003). “Learning in artificial environment: Embodiment, embeddedness and dynamic adaptation.” Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 1, 87–114.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 134Issue 1January 2008
Pages: 67 - 74

History

Received: Apr 18, 2006
Accepted: Jan 8, 2007
Published online: Jan 1, 2008
Published in print: Jan 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Eddy M. Rojas
Executive Director, Pacific Northwest Center for Construction Research and Education; and, Associate Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Univ. of Washington, Box 351610, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail: [email protected]
Carrie Sturts Dossick
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Univ. of Washington, Box 351610, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share