LEGAL AFFAIRS SECTION
Apr 1, 2006

Avoiding and Minimizing Construction Delay Claim Disputes in Relational Contracting

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 132, Issue 2

Abstract

Delays on construction projects, and the claims which emanate from such delays, are an integral part of the modern construction process. The overwhelming amount of time, energy, and cost devoted to delay claims does not begin when a claim is initially submitted at or near the completion of a job, rather, the construction delay claim process commences at project inception. A discussion is provided relative to how claims are generated during a construction project, the various types of delay, contract provisions which may trigger construction delay claims, methods of solidifying a party’s position, presentation, substantiation and justification of a claim, formal and informal methods to resolve claims and, most importantly, mechanisms by which to cut down on the incidence of delay claims.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Acret, J. (1987). Construction litigation handbook, Shephard’s/McGraw-Hill, Colorado Springs, Colo., 95–122.
Baram, G. E. (1992). “Construction claims—Documenting the facts.” Trans. Am. Assn. Cost Eng. Annual Conf., D.4.1–D.4.11.
Bennett, J. E. (1972). GSBCA No. 2362, 72-1, BCA (CCH) Decis. No. 9764 at 43, 467.
Bramble, B. B., and Callahan, M. T. (1987). Construction delay claims, Wiley, New York.
Corinno Civetta Construction Corp. versus. City of New York. (1986). 502 NYS 2d 681, (Ct. of Appeals).
D’Angelo versus State of New York. (1976). 46 A.D. 2d 83, 984, 362 N.Y.S. 2d 283, Aff’d 39 N.Y. 2d 781, 385 N.Y.S. 2d 284, 350 N.E. 2d 615.
Davis Decorating Service. (1973). ASBCA No. 17342, 73-2 BCA (CCH) Decis. No. 10, 107.
De La Garza, J. M., Vorster, M. C., and Parvin, C. M. (1991). “Total float traded as commodity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 117(4), 716–727.
E. C. Ernst, Inc. versus General Motors Corp. (1973). 482 F.2d 1047 (5th Cir.).
Earthbank Co., Inc., versus The City of New York (Dept. of Parks and Recreation). (1991). 568 N.Y.S. 2d 101 (A.D.1 Dept.).
Erecto Corp. versus State. (1968). 29 A.D. 2d 738, 286 N.Y.S. 2d 562 (3rd Dept.).
Finke, M. R. (1990). “Weather-related delays on government contracts.” 1990 Trans. Am. Assn. Cost Eng. Annual Conf., F.3.1–F.3.8.
Fishbach & Moore International Corp. (1977). ASBCA No. 18145, 77-1 BCA (CCH) Decis. No. 12, 300 at p. 67, 874.
Galloway, P. D., and Nielson, K. R. (1990). “Evaluating the contractor’s right to finish early.” Proc., Project Management Institute Seminar/Symp., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 412–418.
Gold, H. (1977). The problem of extra work and extra time, The Masters Institute in Government Construction Contracting, Federal Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C., B1–B127.
Green Builders Inc. (1988). ASBCA No. 35518, 88-2, BCA (CCH) Decis. No. 20, 734.
Groton, J. P., and Wildman, W. R. (1992). “The role of job-site dispute resolution in improving the chances of success on a construction project.” Constr. Lawyer, 12(3), 1, 22–28.
Grow Construction Co., Inc. versus State. (1977). 391 N.Y.S. 2d 726 (App. Div.).
Hohns, M. (1979). Preventing and solving construction contract disputes, Van Nostrand Reinhold Ltd., New York.
James, D. W. (1990). “Concurrency and apportioning liability and damages in public contract adjudications.” Public Contract Law J., 490–531.
Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. versus City of New York. (1983). 461 NY Supp. 2d 746, 448 N.E. 2d 413, 58 N.Y. 2d 377, (Ct. of Appeals).
Kutner, S. (1989). Project management, Kimmons & Lawrence, New York, 297–327.
Marshall versus Karl F. Schultz, Inc. (1983). 38 So.2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App.).
Martell, R. E., and Poretti, D. W. (1988). “Using experts to ‘prove up’ your construction case.” Constr. Lawyer, 8(3), 11–18.
Merrow, E. W., and Yarossi, M. E. (1990). “Assessing project cost and schedule risk.” 1990 Trans. Am. Assn. Cost Eng. Annual Conf., H.6.1–H.6.7.
Novak & Co., Inc. versus Dormatory Authority of the State of New York. (1991). 568 N.Y.S. 2d 453 (A.D. 2 Dept.).
Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. versus HBE Corporation and the Fireman’s Insurance Company. (1992). 894, F.2d 47 (2nd Cir.).
Postner, W. J., and Rubin, R. A. (1992). New York construction law manual, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Rubin, R. A., Guy, S. D., Maevis, A. C., and Fairweather, V. (1983). Construction claims, analysis, presentation, defense, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Santa Fe, Inc. (1984). VABCA Nos. 1943–1946, 84-2 BCA (CCH) Decis. No. 17, 341.
Santa Fe, Inc. (1987). VABCA No. 2168, 87-3 BCA (CCH) Decis. No. 20, 104.
Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. versus U.S. Lines, Inc. (1977). 439 F. Sup. 671 .
Thomas, R. G., and Wilshusen, F. D. (1989). “How to beat a ‘no damage’ clause with respect to delay in building or construction contract.” 74 ALR 3d 187, 187–264.
United States versus Blair. (1944). 321 U.S. 730, 64 S. Ct. 820.
United Telecommunications, Inc. versus American Television Communications Corp. (1976). 536 F.2d 1310 (10th Cir.).
Wickwire, J. M., Hurlbut, S. B., and Lerman, L. J. (1989). “Use of critical path method techniques in contract claims: Issues and developments, 1978 to 1988.” Public Contract Law J., 338, 338–391.
Wigal, G. S. (1991). “Interference with a contractor’s early completion of a construction project.” Constr. Lawyer, 10(4), 17–24.
Yates, J. K., and Audi, J. (1998a). “Development of the project management Perception program.” J. Project Management Institute, 29(3), 13–20.
Yates, J. K, and Audi, J. (1998b). “Using decision support systems for delay analysis: The project management perception program.” J. Project Management Institute, 29(2), 29–29.
Yturralde, D. J. (1989). “Mitigation of construction delay claims.” Proc., Project Management Institute, Seminar/Symp., Atlanta, 289–291.
Zack, J. G. Jr. (1992). “Claimsmanship—A current discussion.” Trans. Am. Asso. Cost Eng. Annual Conf., D.6.1–D.6.9.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 132Issue 2April 2006
Pages: 168 - 179

History

Received: Feb 8, 2005
Accepted: Nov 9, 2005
Published online: Apr 1, 2006
Published in print: Apr 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

J. K. Yates, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., San Jose State Univ., One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0083 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Alan Epstein, M.ASCE [email protected]
124 East 91 Street, New York, NY 10128. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share