LEGAL AFFAIRS SECTION
Apr 1, 2006

Corridor Protection through NEPA

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 132, Issue 2

Abstract

The addition of interchanges, traffic signals, or unsignalized driveways to an arterial corridor increases crash risk and decreases travel speeds. As adjacent vacant land is developed, however, private landowners often desire direct access to the arterial route. Because the Virginia Department of Transportation has the authority to allow direct access provided no immediate adverse impact would occur, arterials in high-growth areas tend to have an increasing number of intersections as demands for direct access grow. This study investigated the feasibility of using the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to limit corridor access (e.g., grade-separated interchanges or at-grade intersections) through four administrative mechanisms: (1) including the limited access requirement as a condition in the record of decision; (2) effecting a contract (the Federal-Aid Project Agreement) that stipulates limiting access as a requirement; (3) implementing a supplemental agreement between interested parties that indicates how the character of the corridor shall be maintained; and (4) documenting the corridor-preservation conditions that remove the requirement of an Environmental Impact Statement. Factors that limit the effectiveness of these mechanisms include (1) the source of funds for the project; (2) the extent to which environmental concerns remain constant after the NEPA process is concluded; (3) the willingness of agencies to exercise the authority they are accorded through NEPA-related agreements; and (4) the passage of congressional legislation that enhances or restricts the scope of NEPA. Case studies of projects in Virginia where the NEPA process has helped preserve the characteristics of corridors show that the process may serve to raise barriers to adding access points but does not guarantee that access points may never be added.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers thank the individuals who contributed time, energy, and inspiration to this work. J. C. Southard suggested the original idea behind this paper—that of using NEPA as a corridor preservation instrument—and provided review comments throughout the project. W. S. Ferguson provided insights, M. F. Kirkland and K. J. Peters provided additional legal research, and L. D. Evans provided essential editing.

References

American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO). (1973). A Policy on design of urban highways and arterial streets, Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1990). Rep. of the AASHTO Task Force on Corridor Preservation, Washington, D.C.
Bowman, D. L., and Rushing, C. C. (1999). “Access management: Transportation policy considerations for a growing Virginia.” VTRC 99-R16, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Va.
Chertok, M. A. (2004). Federal regulation of wetlands, Sive, Paget, and Riesel, New York ⟨http://www.sprlaw.com/pdfs/Wetlandsvweb.pdf⟩.
Cohen, W. M. (2001). Issues in NEPA Litigation: National Workshop for District Judges, Federal Judicial Center, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://www.faa.gov/programs/en/caselaw/nepalit.doc⟩.
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). (1978a). Part 1500—Purpose, policy, and mandate, Washington, D.C. ⟨http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/1500.htm#1500.6⟩ (Feb. 13, 2004).
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). (1978b). “Sec. 1505.2 Record of Decision in Cases Requiring Environmental Impact Statements.” Part 1505: NEPA and agency decision making, Washington, D.C. ⟨http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/1505.htm#1505.2⟩.
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). (1981). NEPA’s forty most asked questions, Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/40/30-40.HTM#34⟩.
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). (1997a). Environmental Quality 1994–1995, Washington, D.C. ⟨http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/reports/1994-95/25th_ann. pdf⟩.
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). (1997b). The National Environmental Policy Act: A study of its effectiveness after twenty-five years, Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/nepa25fn.pdf⟩.
Fay, J. D. (1978). “The effect of NEPA on Federal Aid Highway Projects in Virginia,” Master's thesis, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (1981). Federal Project Number I-95–1(44)47 administrative action final environmental impact statement, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (1992). Secondary and cumulative impact assessment in the highway project development process, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://nepa.fhwa.dot.gov/ReNepa/ReNepa.nsf/aa5aec9f63be385c852568cc0055ea16/845bc790d9a8949985256934006ae913/$FILE/Secondary+and+Cumulative+Impact+Assessment+in+the+Highway+Project+Development+Process.htm⟩ (June 8, 2004).
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2000a). Transportation corridor preservation: A survey of state government current practices, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/cp_state.htm⟩ (June 5, 2003).
Federal Highway Administration, Virginia Division. (2000b). “Questions and answers on I-66, Section 357 of FHwA’s FY 2000 Appropriations Act.” Richmond, Va.
Federal Highway Administration, Virginia Division. (2001). “Record of decision: Route 37 location study (The Winchester Bypass).” EIS Number: FHwA-VA-EIS-94–01-F, Richmond, Va.
Florida Department of Transportation, Office of the State Transportation Planner, Systems Planning Office. (2003). Access management: Balancing access and mobility, Tallahassee, Fla., ⟨http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/sm/accman/pdfs/ampromo3.pdf⟩ (June 10, 2004).
Frankel, G. (1980). “Richmond’s beltway battle.” Washington Post, Dec. 28, at B1.
Gamboa, A. H., 2001. “Opinion on whether Trinity River record of decision is a rule.” B-287557, General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C. ⟨http://www.gao.gov/decisions/other/287557.htm⟩.
Gluck, J., Levinson, H., and Stover, V. (1998). “Impacts of access management techniques.” NCHRP Rep. 420, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Gowan, A. (2003). “Colliding Over I-66 Congestion.” Washington Post, July 31, Extra.
“HOV lanes may end up on Virginia’s shoulders.” (1990). Engineering News Record, July 12, 24.
Jernigan, J. (1999). Briefing paper: Local land use management and state transportation policy: State of the art and practice, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Va.
Kamprath, M. T., and Miller, J. S. (2004). “Feasibility of protecting corridors through the National Environmental Policy Act.” VTRC Rep. 04-R29, Charlottesville, Va. ⟨http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/04-r29.pdf⟩.
King, T. (1998). Cultural resource laws and practice an introductory guide, AltaMira, Walnut Creek, Calif.
Lewis, T., 1997. Divided highways: Building the interstate highways, transforming American life, Viking, New York.
Louis Berger Group, Inc. (2002). “Desk reference for estimating the indirect effects of proposed transportation projects.” NCHRP Rep. 466, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. ⟨http://gulliver.trb.org/publications/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_466.pdf⟩.
Maffei, M. A. (1991). Comment, establishing a standard for the mitigated environmental assessment under NEPA, The public land law review, Universus of Montana, Missoula, Vol. 12, 81–88 ⟨http://heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals/publan&collection=journals⟩.
Messina, D. (2001). “Officials seek end to HOV on 264.” Virginian-Pilot, Norfolk, December 5, at B3.
Perfater, M. A. (1989). “Highway corridor preservation: A synthesis of practice.” VTRC 90-TAR1, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Va.
Peter, J. (1999). “House approves bill that would open hov lanes on area routes.” Virginian Pilot, Feb. 9, at B5.
Rodgers, W. H., Jr. (2000). “The most creative moments in the history of environmental law: The Whats.” Univ. Illinois Law Rev., 2000(1), 1–35.
Sheldon, K. P., and Squillace, M. (1998). NEPA litigation guide, American Bar Association, Chicago.
Thomas, D. A., and Payne, R. S. (1998). “Long-range highway corridor preservation: Issues, methods and model legislation.” BYU J. Public Law, 13, 1–47.
U.S. Department of Transportation. (1977). “Secretary’s decision on Interstate Highway 66, Fairfax and Arlington Counties, Virginia.” January 5.
Virginia Department of Transportation, Project Management Office. (2000). Introduction to project management and the PE project development process, Richmond, Va.
Virginia Department of Transportation. (2001). Final environmental impact statement: Coalfields expressway location study, Richmond, Va.
Virginia Department of Transportation. (2004). Board approves almost $40 million for improvement projects, new location for proposed Route 17 in Chesapeake, Press Release 4/19/2001, Accessed at ⟨http://virginiadot.org/infoservice/News/CO04192001-ctb.asp⟩ (Feb. 18, 2004).
White, L. J. (2001). “Dividing highway: Citizen activism and Interstate 66 in Arlington, Virginia.” Wash. History, 13(1), 52–67.
Yost, N. (1995). NEPA deskbook, 2nd Ed., Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 132Issue 2April 2006
Pages: 158 - 167

History

Received: Jul 19, 2005
Accepted: Oct 1, 2005
Published online: Apr 1, 2006
Published in print: Apr 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michael T. Kamprath [email protected]
Attorney, Barron, Redding, Hughes, Fite, Sanborn & Kiehn, P.A., P.O. Box 2467, Panama City, FL 32402. E-mail:[email protected]; formerly, J.D. Candidate, Univ. of Florida, Levin College of Law, P.O. Box 13166, Gainesville, FL 32604.
John S. Miller [email protected]
Senior Research Scientist, Virginia Transportation Research Council, 530 Edgemont Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share