TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 1, 1999

Evaluation Model Using Fundamentals of Engineering Examination

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 125, Issue 2

Abstract

A model for evaluating engineering student performance using the fundamentals of engineering (FE) examination has been developed. A database of FE examination data over several years and for more than 50 universities provides the basis for model development. FE examination data are presented in several forms to evaluate engineering student performance. First, a comparison of performance by discipline [e.g., mechanical engineer (ME) and civil engineer (CE)] in individual subject areas (e.g., dynamics, fluid mechanics, engineering economy) relative to the national average in those subject areas provides performance information for individual universities. Second, a measure, called the Tarquin number, has been developed that is used to compare “best-in-class” and “worst-in-class” performers by discipline and in individual subject areas both within and across institutions. The Tarquin number controls student population bias and can thus be effectively used. To evaluate engineering student performance, a weighted Tarquin number, which is an average of individual Tarquin numbers for each sub-ject area weighted by the number of students taking the particular examination, has been developed. For a series of “test cases,” model validation is based on plausible explanations for the identified performance (either best-inclass or worst-in-class). More quantitative validation will be provided as universities become partners in the study.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Benefield, L. D. ( 1996). “Assessment and quality in higher education: a model with best practice.” Proc., Conf. on Assessment and Quality, American Association for Higher Education, Washington, D.C.
2.
Clark, S. B. ( 1991). “When control groups do not exist: Program evaluation without a net.” Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Tenn. 1991.
3.
Dinham, S. M. ( 1989). “Assessment, accreditation, and licensure, and their effects upon teaching and learning.” Center for Research on Undergraduate Education, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
4.
Engineering Criteria 2000 . (1996). American Board of Engineering and Technology, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., Baltimore.
5.
Ferrier, M. B. ( 1994). “In search of effective quality assessment.” ASSE Prism, 4(1), 23–25.
6.
Mazurek, D. F. (1995). “Consideration of FE exam for program assessment.”J. Prof. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 121(4), 247–249.
7.
Neff, G. ( 1995). “Transforming engineering education from a product to a process.” Proc., 4th World Conf. on Engrg. Educ., St. Paul, Minn.
8.
Rodriguez, H. V. ( 1989). “How many engineering colleges require students to take the FE exam?” J. Engrg. Educ., 79(3), 437–438.
9.
Wolverton, M. ( 1994). “A new alliance: Continuous quality and classroom effectiveness.” ASHE-ERIC Higher Educ. Rep. No. 6, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, D.C.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 125Issue 2April 1999
Pages: 47 - 55

History

Received: Jan 6, 1998
Published online: Apr 1, 1999
Published in print: Apr 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

P.E.,
P.E.
Asst. Prof. of Mech. Engrg., Mech. and Industrial Engrg. Dept., Univ. of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University, El Paso, TX 79968-0521.
Asst. Prof. of Industrial Engrg., Mech. and Industrial Engrg. Dept., Univ. of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University, El Paso, TX.
Prof. of Civ. Engrg., Civ. Engrg. Dept., Univ. of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University, El Paso, TX.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share