Effect of Pumping on Properties of Bridge Concrete
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 12, Issue 3
Abstract
Pumping of concrete is widely used in large highway projects due to convenience and economy of placement. The short-term effects of pumping on the durability of concrete is well documented, whereas the long-term effects on concrete durability is not known. Both types of effects were studied herein through collection and testing of 73 concrete samples from the Florida Department of Transportation bridge construction sites before and after pumping. The tests performed were air content, slump, unit weight, compressive strength, rapid chloride permeability, and water permeability. The air content and the slump of concrete decreased by about 1% and 13 mm (0.5 in.) on average, respectively, due to pumping. The unit weight and compressive strength of concrete were found to increase by about 24 kg/m3 (1.5 pcf) and 1.83 MPa (266 psi), respectively, due to pumping. Although test results are not statistically significant, pumping decreased the water and chloride ion permeabilities in the majority of tested samples. Results show that pumping does not have detrimental effects on concrete properties. In many cases, it results in stronger, denser, and more durable concrete. It is suggested that pumping be continued as a means of concrete placement in Florida Department of Transportation projects with confidence.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AASHTO. (1996). “Rapid chloride permeability test.” AASHTO Test Procedure T-277, Washington, D.C.
2.
ASTM. (1990). “Standard test method for slump of hydraulic cement concrete.” C 143-90a, West Conshohocken, Pa.
3.
ASTM. (1992). “Standard test method for unit weight, yield, and air content (gravimetric) of concrete.” C 138-92, West Conshohocken, Pa.
4.
ASTM. (1993). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” C 39-93a, West Conshohocken, Pa.
5.
ASTM. (1994). “Standard test method for air content of freshly mixed concrete by the volumetric method.” C 173-94, West Conshohocken, Pa.
6.
Ayyub, B. M., and McCuen, R. H. (1997). Probability, statistics and reliability for engineers, CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
7.
Expanded Shale, Clay, and Slate Institute. (1992). “Guide for pumping lightweight concrete.” Concrete Constr., 37(February), 96–98.
8.
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). ( 1995). Database of concrete mix designs, Tallahassee, Fla.
9.
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). ( 1996). “Water permeability test.” FMI-T141/93, FDOT Test Methods, Tallahassee, FL.
10.
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). (1999). Standard specifications for highway design, Tallahassee, Fla.
11.
Hover, K. (1993). “The influence of handling on air-entrained concrete.” Rep. to the American Concrete Pumping Association.
12.
Liu, Y. (1993). “A pumping of concrete.” Res. Rep., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Florida A. & M. University-Florida State University College of Engineering, Tallahassee, Fla.
13.
Malisch, W. (1991). “Concrete producers who also pump concrete.” Concrete Constr., 36(August), 607–609.
14.
Malisch, W. (1992). “Water-cement ratio, water reducers, and finishability.” Concrete Constr., 37(April), 315.
15.
“Effects of Pumping Air-Entrained Concrete.” (1991). Washington Aggregates and Concrete Association.
16.
Yingling, J., Mulliings, G., and Gaynor, R. (1992). “Loss of air content in pumped concrete.” Concrete Int., 14(October), 57–61.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: May 24, 1999
Published online: Aug 1, 2000
Published in print: Aug 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.