Model Correction via Compatible Element Method
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 3
Abstract
The theoretical derivation proposed in this paper uses a specific pseudoinverse technique baesd on an incomplete set of measured modes to satisfy the orthogonality condition. Unlike others, this method demonstrates that the updated model derived from the special pseudoinverse technique does exist in the complete modal space and satisfy the eigenequation. There are three basic, compatible, model characteristics in the updated model: (1) Both low‐order and high‐order modes of the updated model correspond to the measured modes and the analytical high‐order modes of the original finite element model, respectively; (2) the distortion (such as negative eigenvalues) of eigenpairs obtained from the modified model can be eliminated by controlling the high‐order modes of the updated model; and (3) the updated matrices retain the properties of the original finite element matrices, including the banded‐state matrix using the element approach. The derivation of modification formulas in this paper is only based on the orthogonality conditions; therefore, the formulas are much simpler than other procedures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Berman, A., and Wei, F. S. (1981). “Automated dynamic analytical model improvement.” NASA CR‐3452, NASA.
2.
Baruch, M. (1982). “Optimal correction of mass and stiffness matrices using measured modes.” AIAA J., 20(11), 1623–1626.
3.
Caesar, B. (1986). “Update and identification of dynamic mathematical models.” Proc. 4th Int. Model Anal. Conf., 394–401.
4.
Wei, F. S., and Zhang, D.‐W. (1989). “Mass matrix modification using element correction method.” AIAA J., 27(1), 119–121.
5.
Zhang, D.‐W. (1988). “Correction of model/guide for re‐creating mechanical model/diagnosis of structural breakdown.” Proc. 6th Int. Model Anal. Conf., 1537–1542.
6.
Zhang, D.‐W., and Li, J.‐J. (1987). “A new method for updating the dynamic mathematical model of a structure, Part 1: Quasicomplete modified model and a concept of guide‐type method for re‐creating a model.” DFVLR IB 232‐87 J05, Gottingen.
7.
Zhang, D.‐W., and Li, Y.‐M. (1989). “An element‐type perturbation iteration method—the modification of analytical models and diagnosis of generalized failure.” J. Vibration and Shock, 8(3), 23–31 (in Chinese).
8.
Zhang, D.‐W., Wei, F. S., and Li, Y.‐M. (1988). “Optimal element‐type perturbation method for updating analytical model.” J. Vibration Engrg., 1(4), 97–105 (in Chinese).
9.
Zhang, D.‐W., Wei, F. S., and Li, Y.‐M. (1989). “Correction of analytical model using a generalized inverse technique—Matrix‐type and element‐type.” Proc. 7th Int. Model Anal. Conf., 52–58.
10.
Zhang, D.‐W., and Zhao, L.‐C. (1986). “The minimum‐norm perturbation method for the modification of structural analytic model.” Proc. 4th Int. Model Anal. Conf. 541–548.
11.
Zhang, D.‐W., and Zhao, L.‐C. (1990). “Inverse weighted residue method and its application to model correction.” Proc. 8th Int. Model Anal. Conf., 968–971.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 5 • Issue 3 • July 1992
Pages: 337 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1992
Published in print: Jul 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.